تدوین چارچوب سیاست‌های تأمین مالی کارآفرینی فناورانه

نویسندگان

1 دانشجو دکتری کارآفرینی فناورانه دانشگاه تهران

2 دانشیار کارآفرینی دانشگاه تهران

3 استادیار کارآفرینی دانشگاه تهران

چکیده

محدودیت منابع یکی از مهمترین مسائلی است که سیاستگذاران با آن مواجه هستند. این محدودیت ها سیاستگذاران را به سمت انتخاب اولویت ها در سیاستگذاری ها سوق می دهد. با توجه به اینکه کارآفرینان می توانند محور توسعه باشند، محدودیت های تأمین مالی کارآفرینان یکی از مهمترین دغدغه های سیاستگذارن است. پاسخ به این محدویت ها نیازمند شناخت چارچوب سیاستگذاری تأمین مالی کارآفرینی است. در این مطالعه هدف ارائه چارچوب مفهومی سیاست های تأمین مالی کارافرینی فناورانه است، لذا با روش مرور سیستماتیک، سیاست های این حوزه گردآوری و بررسی گردیده است. در این مطالعه کیفی با بهره گیری از نظریه داده بنیاد، چارچوب این سیاست ها احصا می گردد. از آنجایی که کارآفرینی، دانشی جوان محسوب می‌شود، به تبع آن مطالعات میان رشته ای این حوزه از جمله سیاستگذاری کارافرین فناورانه نیازمند ارائه یک چارچوب مفهومی است. تبیین روند مطالعات و مفاهیم تشکیل دهنده این حوزه از جمله دستاوردهای این پژوهش است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


1- استراس، انسلم، کوربین جولیت(1391) مبانی پژوهش کیفی، فنون و مراحل تولید نظریه زمینه­ای، ترجمه ابراهیم افشار، تهران: نشر نی، چاپ دوم.

2- اعرابی سید محمد، بودلایی حسن(1394) طراحی یک نظام طبقه بندی به مثابه سیاست توسعه کارآفرینی، سیاستگذاری عمومی، دوره 1، شماره 4 ، 9-26.

3- جمشیدی بروجردی علیرضا، امامی سید مجتبی، بنی اسد رضا (1397) طراحی چهارچوب مفهومی خط مشی های تنظیمی در حوزه محتوای فضای مجازی جمهوری اسلامی ایران، سیاستگذاری عمومی، دوره 4، شماره 1،  99-125.

4- دانایی فرد حسن(1388) روش شناسی تدوین خط مشی ملی کارآفرینی کشور: چارچوبی مفهومی،  توسعه کارآفرینی، سال دوم، شماره ششم، 155-125.

5- داوری، علی(1391) ارائة مدل نظام خط مشی گذاری توسعه کارآفرینی،چشم انداز مدیریت دولتی، شماره 11، ص 33-50.

6- Acs, Z. J., & Szerb, L. (2007). Entrepreneurship, economic growth and public policy. Small business economics, 28(2-3), 109-122.

7- Adam, R. I., Osano, P., Birika, J., Ndede Amadi, A. A., & Bwisa, H. (2017). The situation of women in the agribusiness sector in Africa. Development in Practice, 27(6), 892-898.

8- Antolin-Lopez, R., Martinez-del-Rio, J., & Cespedes-Lorente, J. (2016). Fostering product innovation in new ventures: Which public instruments are more effective?. European redearch on management and business economics, 22(1), 38-46.

9- Audretsch, D. B., & Thurik, A. R. (2001). What's new about the new economy? Sources of growth in the managed and entrepreneurial economies. Industrial and corporate change, 10(1), 267-315.

10- Ayodeji, O. O. (2012). A conceptual model for developing venture capital in emerging economies. Journal of Management Policy and Practice, 13(2), 101.

11- Bailetti, T. (2012). Technology entrepreneurship: overview, definition, and distinctive aspects. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(2), 5.

12- Balachandra, P., Nathan, H. S. K., & Reddy, B. S. (2010). Commercialization of sustainable energy technologies. Renewable Energy, 35(8), 1842-1851.

13- Bjørgum, Ø. Moen, Ø. & Madsen, T. K. (2013). New ventures in an emerging industry: access to and use of international resources. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 20(2), 233-253.

14- Boussiakou, L. G., Kalkani, E. C., & Boussiakou, I. K. (2009). Networking engineering communities in advancing information sharing: open collaboration for Greek engineers. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 7(1), 55-64

15- Burgelman R. A., Modesto A. Maidique, and Steven C. Wheelwright, Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation, second edition, 1996, pp. 1-12.

16- Bygrave, W. D. (1988). The structure of the investment networks of venture capital firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 3(2), 137-157.

17- Cahan, B. B., Marboe, I., & Roedel, H. (2016). Outer Frontiers of Banking: Financing Space Explorers and Safeguarding Terrestrial Finance. New Space, 4(4), 253-268.

18- Chang, P. L., & Shih, H. Y. (2004). The innovation systems of Taiwan and China: a comparative analysis. Technovation, 24(7), 529-539.

19- Charmaz, K., & Belgrave, L. L. (2007). Grounded theory. The Blackwell encyclopedia of sociology.

20- Chirambo, D. (2016). Integrating Microfinance, Climate Finance and Climate Change Adaptation: A Sub-Saharan Africa Perspective. In Climate Change Adaptation, Resilience and Hazards (pp. 195-207). Springer International Publishing.

21- Coase, R. H. (1960). The problem of social cost. In Classic papers in natural resource economics (pp. 87-137). Palgrave Macmillan, London.

22- Crean, K. W. (2010). Accelerating innovation in information and communication technology for health. Health Affairs, 29(2), 278-283.

23- Delapierre, M., Madeuf, B., & Savoy, A. (1998). NTBFs—the French case. Research Policy, 26(9), 989-1003.

24- Domac, J., Benković, Z., & Starčić, T. (2008). Development of a sustainable charcoal industry. Šumarski list, 132(11-12), 555-561.

25- Eliasson, G., & Eliasson, Å. (2006). The Pharmacia story of entrepreneurship and as a creative technical university 1–an experiment in innovation, organizational break up and industrial renaissance. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 18(5), 393-420.
Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, web of science, and Google scholar: strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB journal, 22(2), 338-342.

26- Freear, J., Sohl, J. E., & Wetzel, W. (2002). Angles on angels: financing technology-based ventures-a historical perspective. Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 4(4), 275-287.

27- Friebe, C. A., von Flotow, P., & Täube, F. A. (2013). Exploring the link between products and services in low-income markets—Evidence from solar home systems. Energy Policy, 52, 760-769.

28- George, G., & Prabhu, G. N. (2003). Developmental financial institutions as technology policy instruments: Implications for innovation and entrepreneurship in emerging economies. Research Policy, 32(1), 89-108.

29- Gilaninia, S. (2017). Competitive support of governments for research, development and innovation and its interaction with knowledge production criteria. Cogent Business & Management, 4(1), 1315861.

30- Hart, D. M. (2003). Entrepreneurship Policy. What It Is and Where It Come From. The Emergence of Entrepreneurship Policy. Governance, Start-ups and Growth in the US knowledge economy.

31- Hatzikian, J. (2007). Research and technological development policy and innovative performance: The Greek case within the EU. Regionalization, Growth, and Economic Integration, 229-250.

32- Hirschman, E. C. (1991). Babies for sale: Market ethics and the new reproductive technologies. Journal of consumer affairs, 25(2), 358-390.

33- Jabareen, Y. (2009). Building a conceptual framework: hilosophy, definitions, and procedure. International Journal of qualitative methods, 8(4), 49-62

34- Julian, C. C., & Ahmed, Z. U. (2012). Factors impacting international entrepreneurship in Malaysia. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 19(2), 229-245.

35- Kammen, D. M. (2015, March). Solar energy innovation and Silicon Valley. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1652, No. 1, pp. 153-159). AIP.

36- Kariuki, P., & Ofusori, L. O. (2017, March). WhatsApp-Operated Stokvels Promoting Youth Entrepreneurship in Durban, South Africa: Experiences of Young Entrepreneurs. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (pp. 253-259). ACM.

37- Kihlgren, A. (2003). Promotion of innovation activity in Russia through the creation of science parks: the case of St. Petersburg (1992–1998). Technovation, 23(1), 65-76.

38- Kim, H., Lee, Y. J., & Ames, M. D. (2005). Promoting business incubation for improved competitiveness of small and medium industries in Korea. International Journal of Technology Management, 32(3-4), 350-370.

39- Kozan, M. K., Öksoy, D., & Özsoy, O. (2006). Growth plans of small businesses in Turkey: Individual and environmental influences. Journal of Small Business Management, 44(1), 114-129.

40- Kuschel, K., Kuschel, K., Lepeley, M. T., Lepeley, M. T., Espinosa, F., Espinosa, F., & Gutiérrez, S. (2017). Funding challenges of Latin American women start-up founders in the technology industry. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 24(2), 310-331.

41- Liñán, F., & Fayolle, A. (2015). A systematic literature review on entrepreneurial intentions: citation, thematic analyses, and research agenda. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11(4), 907-933.

42- Lin, C., & Luo, J. (2018). International Capacity Cooperation and Financial Support of Countries along the" Chongqing-Xinjiang-Europe" under the background of the Belt and Road. Archives of Business Research, 6(4).

43- Littlejohn, T. (2002). Sunbaked biotechnology in Australia. Nature biotechnology, 20(9), 873-877.

44- Lotz, F. J., & Buys, A. J. (2005, September). New technological ventures: start-up financing trends in South Africa. In Engineering Management Conference, 2005. Proceedings. 2005 IEEE International (Vol. 1, pp. 165-169). IEEE.

45- Lundström, A., & Stevenson, L. (2001, March). Entrepreneurship policy for the future. Swedish Foundation for Small Business Research (Forum för småföretagsforskning).

46- Lundström, A., & Stevenson, L. (2002). On the road to entrepreneurship policy. Swedish Foundation for Small Business Research [Forum för småföretagsforskning].

47- Markatou, M. (2015). Incentives to promote entrepreneurship in Greece: results based on the ‘New Innovative Entrepreneurship’program. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 1113-1122.

48- Martinot, E., Chaurey, A., Lew, D., Moreira, J. R., & Wamukonya, N. (2002). Renewable energy markets in developing countries. Annual review of energy and the environment, 27(1), 309-348.

49- Minola, T., Cassia, L., & Criaco, G. (2013). Financing patterns in new technology-based firms: an extension of the pecking order theory. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business 25, 19(2), 212-233.

50- Mirzanti, I. R., Simatupang, T. M., & Larso, D. (2015). Mapping on Entrepreneurship Policy in Indonesia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 169, 346-353.

51- Monitor, G. E. (2008). GEM. Global Report.

52- Mustar, P., & Wright, M. (2010). Convergence or path dependency in policies to foster the creation of university spin-off firms? A comparison of France and the United Kingdom. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(1), 42-65.

53- Naqvi, I. B. (2011). National innovation system in a least developing country: the case of Pakistan. International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management, 11(2), 139-154.

54- Petti, C., & Zhang, S., (2011). Factors influencing technological entrepreneurship capabilities: Towards an integrated research framework for Chinese enterprises. Journal of Technology Management in China, 6(1), 7–25.

55- Politis, D., Gabrielsson, J., & Shveykina, O. (2012). Early-stage finance and the role of external entrepreneurs in the commercialization of university-generated knowledge. Venture Capital, 14(2-3), 175-198.

56- Prodan, I. (2007). Technological entrepreneurship: technology transfer from academia to new firms. PhD. Ljubljana: Faculty of Economics, University of Ljubljana.

57- Rasmussen, E., & Sørheim, R. (2012). How governments seek to bridge the financing gap for university spin-offs: Proof-of-concept, pre-seed, and seed funding. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 24(7), 663-678.

58- Reddy, B. S., Balachandra, P., & Nathan, H. S. K. (2009). Universalization of access to modern energy services in Indian households—economic and policy analysis. Energy Policy, 37(11), 4645-4657.

59- Redford, D. T. (2012). Entrepreneurship and Public Policy in Today and Tomorrow’s Portuguese republic. University of California.

60- Reynolds, P., Storey, D. J., & Westhead, P. (1994). Cross-national comparisons of the variation in new firm formation rates. Regional studies, 28(4), 443-456.

61- Reynolds, P. D. (2001). National panel study of US business startups: Background and methodology. In Databases for the Study of Entrepreneurship (pp. 153-227). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

62- Romer, P. M. (1994). The origins of endogenous growth. The journal of economic perspectives, 8(1), 3-22.

63- Rosiello, A., Avnimelech, G., & Teubal, M. (2011). Towards a systemic and evolutionary framework for venture capital policy. In Catching up, spillovers and innovation networks in a Schumpeterian perspective (pp. 195-216). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

64- Schumpeter, J. A. (1961). The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle (1912/1934). Google Scholar.

65- Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2003). Guest editors’ introduction to the special issue on technology entrepreneurship. Research policy, 32(2), 181-184.

66- Shet, S. V., Patil, S. V., & Chandawarkar, M. R. (2017). Framework for methodical review of literature on leadership competencies. Cogent Business & Management, 4(1), 1309123.

67- Sofouli, E., & Vonortas, N. S. (2007). S&T Parks and business incubators in middle-sized countries: the case of Greece. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 32(5), 525-544.

68- Stevenson, L., & Lundström, A. (2007). Dressing the emperor: the fabric of entrepreneurship policy. Handbook of research on entrepreneurship policy, 94-129.

69- Storey, D. J. (1991). The birth of new firms—does unemployment matter? A review of the evidence. Small business economics, 3(3), 167-178.

70- Storey, D. J. (2016). Understanding the small business sector. Routledge.

71- Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2008). Basics of qualitative research. Translated by Mohammadi, Biok, and Tehran: Human Science & Cultural Studies Center Publication [in Persian].

72- Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage Publications, Inc.

73- Tyebjee, T., & Vickery, L. (1988). Venture capital in Western Europe. Journal of Business Venturing, 3(2), 123-136.

74- Verheul, I., Wennekers, S., Audretsch, D., & Thurik, R. (2001). An eclectic theory of entrepreneurship: policies, institutions and culture (No. 01-030/3). Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper.

75- Zamberi Ahmad, S. (2011). Businesswomen in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Characteristic, growth patterns and progression in a regional context. Equality, diversity and inclusion: an international journal, 30(7), 610-614.

76- Zhang, M. Y., & Dodgson, M. (2007). “A roasted duck can still fly away”: A case study of technology, nationality, culture and the rapid and early internationalization of the firm. Journal of World Business, 42(3), 336-349.

77- Zhou, H., Sandner, P. G., Martinelli, S. L., & Block, J. H. (2016). Patents, trademarks, and their complementarity in venture capital funding. Technovation, 47, 14-22.

78- Zhu, Y., Wittmann, X., & Peng, M. W. (2012). Institution-based barriers to innovation in SMEs in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29(4), 1131-1142.