1. Archer, M .(1995). Realistic Social Theory: the morphogenetic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
2. Bhaskar, R. (1975). A Realist Theory of Science. London: Routledge.
3. Bhaskar, R. (1979). The Possibility of Naturalism, A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences (Third edition). London: Routledge.
4. Bhaskar, R. (1989). Reclaiming Reality, A critical introduction to contemporary philosophy, London: Routledge.
5. Bourdieu, P. (2011/1390). Distinction: A Social Critique of Judgments of Taste (H. Chavoshian, trans) Tehran: Sales Publication. [In Persian]
6. Berger, P. Luckmann, T. (1996/1375). The Construction of Social Reality (F. Majidi, trans) Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publications. [In Persian]
7. Blaikie, N. (2013/1392). Strategies of Social Research, (H. Aghabigpouri, trans) (second edition), Tehran: Sociologists Publications. [In Persian]
8. Blaikie, N. (2008/1387). Designing Social Research (H. Chavoshian, trans), Tehran: Ney Publication. [In Persian]
9. Brown, Ed. & Cloke, J. (2004). Neoliberal Reform, Governance and Corruption in the South: Assessing the International Anti-Corruption Crusade, Antipode, 36(2),272-294.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2004.00406.x
10. Batory, A. (2012). Why do anti-corruption laws fail in Central Eastern Europe? a target compliance perspective, Regulation & Governance, 6(1): 66-82. DOI:
10.1111/j.1748-5991.2011.01125.x
11. Collier, M. (2002). Explaining Corruption: An institutional choice approach, Crime ,Law & Social Change, 38(1): 1-32. DOI:
10.1023/A:1019802614530
12. Creswell, J .W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (Second edition) Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
13. Creswell, J. W. (2012/1391). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (Hassan Danaeifard, and Ali Salehi, trans), Tehran: Mehraban Publication. [In Persian]
14. Cruickshank, J. (2003). Realism and Sociology, Anti-foundationalism, ontology and social research, London and New York, Routledge.
15. Danermark, B., Ekström, M., L, Jakobsen., & j. c. Karlsson .(2002). Explaining society: critical realism in the social sciences. London: Routledge.
16. Elder-Vass, D. (2010). The Casual Power of Social Structures: Emergence, structure, Agency. New York: Cambridge University.
17. Giddens, A. (1993). New Rules of Sociological Method, A Positive Critique of Interpretative Sociologies (Second edition).Stanford: Stanford University Press.
18. Giddens, A. (2017/1996). The Constitution of Society (A. Ahmadi, trans), Tehran: elm Publication. [In Persian]
19. Guba, E. G. & Lincoln Y. S. (2005). Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions, and Emerging Confluence, In The N. K. Denzin N. k & Y. S. Lincoln Y.S .The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp 190-210) (Third edition) Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage.
20. Hall, M. (2009). the corruption enigma: understanding success and failure of corruption reform program in highly corrupt countries, Old Dominion University, A dissertation for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
21. Heeks , R,. & Harald , M.
(2012). Understanding success and failure of anti-corruption initiatives, Crime Law Soc Change, 58 (5), 533–549. DOI:
10.1007/s10611-011-9361-y.
22. Hedstrom, P. & Ylikoski, P. (2010). Causal Mechanisms, in the Social Sciences, Annuall Review Sociology (36) 49–67. DOI:
10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102632.
23. Hedstrom, P. & Swedberg, R. (1998). Social mechanisms: An introductory essay,
in the Social mechanisms, In Hedstrom, P. &
Swedberg ,R. (Ed) An Analytical Approach to Social Theory (pp 1-31),Cambridge University Press.
24. Huther, J. & Shah, A. (2000). Anti-corruption Policies and Programs: a Framework for Evaluation, World Bank, Policy Rersearch working paper (2501) 1-18.
25. Jancsics, D. (2014). interdisciplinary Perspectives on Corruption, Sociology Compass,
8(4): 358–372. DOI:
10.1111/soc4.12146
26. Kazi, M. (2003). Realistic Evaluation in practice, Health and Social Work, London: Sage publications.
27. Khorramshahi, B. (2011/1390). Logical Positivism: A Critical Approach (Fourth Edition), Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publications. [In Persian]
28. Little, D. (1994/1373). Explanation in the Social Sciences, An Introduction to Social Science (A. Soroush, trans), Tehran: Sirat Cultural Institute. [In Persian]
29. Manicas, P. (1998). A realist social science, In Archer. M, Bhaskar. R, Collier. A, Lawson. T, & Norrie. A .(Ed.), The Critical Realism, Essential Readings (pp. 313-338). London: Routledge.
30. Mayntz, R. (2004). Mechanisms in the Analysis of Social Macro-Phenomena, Philosophy of the Social Sciences. 34 (2), 237-259.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393103262552
31. Marqutte, H. (2001). Corruption, democracy and the World Bank, Crim, Law & social Change, Netherlands, 36(4): 395-407. DOI:
10.1023/A:1012045700314
32. Mutebi. M. (2008). explaining the failure of Thailands Anti-corruption Regime, Development and Change. 39(1):147-71.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2008.00472.xDigital Object Identifier (DOI)
33. Mills, C. W. (2010/1389). The Sociological Imagination: A Critique of American Sociology (A. Ansari, trans) (4th edition) Tehran: Enteshar sahami sherkat. [In Persian]
34. Norrie, A. (1998). The limits of justice: Finding fault in the criminal law, In Archer. M, Bhaskar. R, Collier. A, Lawson. T, & Norrie. A .(Ed.), The Critical Realism, Essential Readings (pp. 702-722). London: Routledge.
35. Neuman, W. L. (2004). Basics of Social Research: Qualitative and quantitative approaches, Boston, Allyn & Bacon, Second edition.
36. Neuman, W L. (2010/1389). Social Research Methods, Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (H. Danaeifard & H. Kazemi) Tehran: Mehraban Publication. [In Persian]
37. Pawson, R. & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation, London: Sage.
38. Pawson, R. & Tilley, N. (2004). Realistic evaluation. British Cabinet Office.
39. Pawson, R., Greenhalgh, T., Harvey, G. & Walshe, K. (2004). Realist Synthesis: an introduction, RMP methods, 1-47.
40. Pawson, R. (2006). Evidence-Based Policy, A Realist Perspective, London: Sage.
41. Parsons, T. (1951). The Social System. Glencoe, Ill, Free Press.
42. Persson, A., Rothstein, B. & Teorell, T. (2010). the failure of anti-corruption policies, a theoretical mischaracterization of the problem, GOG working paper series, QOG Institute, 1-28.
43. Turner, J. (2014/1393). Contemporary Sociological Theory (A. A. Moghaddas & M. Soroush, trans), Tehran: Sociologists Publications. [In Persian]
44. Rose-Ackerman, s. (2006/1385). Corruption and the State: Causes, Consequences, and Reform (M. Sabouri, trans), Tehran: Danesh projeh Publication. [In Persian]
45. Ritzer, G. (2011). Sociological Theory (Eighth edition). New York: McGraw-Hill. E
46. Shah, A. (2008). Why Fighting Corruption Remains a Losing Battle, Governance, Risk, and Compliance, Tarantino. A (Ed) Handbook: Technology, Finance, Environmental, and International Guidance and Best Practices ( pp133-151). DOI:
10.1002/9781118269213.ch10
47. Sayer, A. (1992). Method in Social Science, A realist approach (Second edition). London: Routledge.
48. Sayer, A. (2000). Realism and Social Science, A realist approach. London: Sage.
49. Schutz, A. (1967). The Phenomenology of the Social World, translated by Walsh G., Klehnert, F., Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
50. Strauss, A. L. & Juliet M. C. (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, Thousand Oaks, California, Sage.
51. Wong, Geoff., Westhorp, G ., Pawson, R. & Greenhalgh, T. (2013). Realist synthesis. London. RAMESE TRAING MATERIALS.
https://www.ramesesproject.org/media/Realist_reviews_training_materials.pdf
52. Westhorp, G. (2014). Realist Impact Evaluation: An Introduction. London: Overseas Development Institute/Methods Lab, 1-12.
https://media.odi.org/documents/9138.pdf.
53. Wittgenstein, L. (2007/1386). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (M. Sh. Adib Soltani, trans) (third edition) Tehran: Amir Kabir Publications. [In Persian]
54. Weber, M. (2003/1382). Methodology of Social Sciences (H. Chavoshian, trans), Tehran: Markaz Publication. [In Persian]
