سیاستگذاری عمومی

سیاستگذاری عمومی

ظرفیت خط‏مشی در بخش عمومی ایران : مطالعه موردی اجرای بودجه‌ریزی مبتنی بر عملکرد

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
اعظم میرزمانی 1
ناهید نادری بنی 2
هانیه محمدیان 3
1 دانشیار مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
2 دانشیار مدیریت آموزشی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
3 کارشناس مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
10.22059/jppolicy.2026.107825
چکیده
اجرای خط­مشی­های عمومی با موانع بسیاری مواجه است که ضعف ظرفیت خط­مشی از جمله آنهاست. هدف این مقاله مطالعه نقش بودجه‌ریزی مبتنی بر عملکرد در ظرفیت خط­مشی است. این مطالعه با تحلیل محتوای کیفی داده‌های حاصل از مطالعات کتابخانه­ای و 31 مصاحبه‌  نشان داد اجرای بودجه‌ریزی مبتنی بر عملکرد تغییری در ظرفیت خط­مشی در ایران ایجاد نکرده و فقدان یا ضعف شدید این ظرفیت ، با جلوگیری از تدوین برنامه‏های تغییر و سالانه، مشکلات زیادی را برای اجرای آن ایجاد کرد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
اجرای خط‌مشی‏های عمومی
ظرفیت خط‌مشی
مدیریت عمومی نوین
بودجه ریزی مبتنی بر عملکرد
ایران
  1. Agaei Hashjin AA, Kringos DS, Manoochehri J, Aryankhesal A, Klazinga NS (2014) Development and Impact of the Iranian Hospital Performance Measurement Program. BMC Health Serv Res 14(1):448
  2. Ajam T, Fourie DJ (2016) Public financial management reform in South African provincial basic education departments. Public Admin Dev Public 36(4):263–282
  3. Alonso JM, Clifton J, Díaz-Fuentes D (2011) Did new public management matter? An empirical analysis of the outsourcing and decentralization effects on publics sector size, Cocops Working Paper No. 4, Available: http:// www. cocops. eu/ wpcon tent/ uploa
  4. ds/ 2011/ 12/ COCOPS_ worki ngpap er_ No4. Pdf
  5. Amiri, A. N., Zare, H., Danaei Fard, H. and Bani Asad, R. (2023). Designing a model of policy-making capacity in the Islamic Consultative Assembly. Majles va Rhadhab, 30(113): 57-100. [in Persian]
  6. Andrews R, Beynon MJ, McDermott A (2019) Configurations of new public management reforms and the efficiency, effectiveness and equity of public healthcare systems: a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. Pub Manag Rev 21(8):1236–1260
  7. Antwi A, Analoui KB, Nana-Agyekum D (2008) Public sector reform in Sub-Saharan Africa: What can be learnt from the civil service performance improvement programme in Ghana? Pub Adm Dev 28(4):253–264
  8. Azar A, Zahedi S, Amirkhani T (2010) Designing a performancebased budgeting model based on system dynamics approach. Iran J Manag Sci 5(18):29–53. [in Persian]
  9. Babajani J, Osta S (2015) A comparative study of performance-based budgeting in Iran and developed countries (A case study of: Canada). Gov Acc 2(3):7–102
  10. Bouckaert G, Loretan R, Troupin S (2016) Public Administration and the Sustainable Development Goals. Written Statement by the International Institute of Administrative Sciences, Submitted to the 15th session of the United Nations Committee of Experts in Public Administration.
  11. Brinkerhoff DW, Brinkerhoff JM (2015) Public sector management reform in developing countries: perspectives beyond NPM orthodoxy. Pub Adm Dev 35(4):222–237.
  12. Carson D, Wellstead A (2015) Government with a cast of dozens: policy capacity risks and policy work in the Northern Territory. Aust J Public Adm 74(2):162–175.
  13. Danaeifard, H., Emami, S. M., and Hosseini, S. K. (2016). An analytical introduction to understanding the issue of public policy capacity: examining its nature, subject, and function. Public Policy, 2( 3): 79-99. [in Persian]
  14. Demirkaya Y (2015) Strategic planning in the Turkish public sector. Transylvanian Rev Adm Sci 2015:15–29.
  15. Dimaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am Sociol Rev 48(2):147–160
  16. Dror Y (2001) The capacity to govern: a report to the club of Rome. Routledge, London
  17. Edwards L (2009) Testing the discourse of declining policy capacity: rail policy and the department of transport. Aust J Pub Admin 68(3):288–302
  18. Eng N (2016) Decentralization in Cambodia: New wine in old bottles. Public Adm Dev 36:250–262
  19. Farahmand MA, Etemadzadeh AH (2008) Strategies for deveploying a performance-based budgeting system. Paper Presented at the First International Operational Budget Conference. https:// www. civil ica. com/ Paper- IPBBC 01- IPBBC 01_ 002. html. Accessed 18 June 2018. [in Persian]
  20. Farazmand A (2009) Building administrative capacity for the age of rapid globalization: a modest prescription for the twenty-first century. Pub Adm Rev 69(6):1007–1020
  21. Giljević T, Novak GL (2020) Integration of migrants through a prism of specific sustainable development goals: a perspective of public administration. Sustain Dev 28(4):1002–1009
  22. Gleeson D, Legge D, O’Neill D, Pfeffer M (2011) Negotiating tensions in developing organizational policy capacity: comparative lessons to be drawn. J Comp Policy Anal Res Pract 13(3):237–263
  23. Head B, Ferguson M, Cherney A, Boreham P (2014) Are policy-makers interested in social research? Exploring the sources and uses of valued information among public servants in Australia. Policy Soc 33(2):89–101
  24. Hou Y, Lunsford RS, Sides KC, Jones KA (2011) State performancebased budgeting in boom and bust years: an analytical framework and survey of the states. Pub Adm Rev 71(3):370–388
  25. Howlett M (2011) Designing public policy. Routledge, London
  26. Ikeanyibe OM (2016) New public management and administrative reforms in Nigeria. Int J Pub Adm 39(7):563–576
  27. Islamic Parliament Research Center (2007) The problems of budgeting in Iran (A Summary of the Opinions of Budgeting Process Practitioners). Report: Office of Planning and Budget Studies, Subject Code: 230, Serial No. 8862. Available at https:// rc. majlis. ir/en. [in Persian]
  28. Jain P, Jain P (2020) Are the sustainable development goals really sustainable? A policy perspective. Sustain Dev 28(6):1642–1652
  29. Karo E, Kattel R (2010) Coordination of innovation policies in the catching-up context: a historical perspective on Estonia and Brazil. Int J Technol Learn Innovation Dev 3(4):293–329
  30. Krippendorff K (2013) Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology, 3rd edn. Sage publication Inc, California
  31. Lee JY, Wang TH (2009) Assessing the impact of performance-based budgeting: a comparative analysis across the United States, Taiwan,and China. Pub Admn Review 69:560–566
  32. Lincoln YS, Guba EG (1985) Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications, Inc., California
  33. Lu Y (2007) Performance Budgeting: The Perspective of State Agencies. Public Budgeting Finance 27(4):1–17
  34. Lu EY, Mohr Z, Tat-Kei Ho A (2015) Taking stock: assessing and improving performance budgeting theory and practice. Pub Perform Manag Rev 38(3):426–458
  35. Madi N, Joseph C, Rahma M (2017). Impediments of environment management system (EMS) implementation in malaysian local authorities- A Preliminary Finding. The 17th Annual Conference of the Asian Academic Accounting Association (2016 Four A Conference), 36:7. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1051/ shsco nf/ 20173 405001
  36. Maor M (1999) The paradox of managerialism. Public Adm Rev 59(1):5–18
  37. Massey A (2019) Persistent public management reform: an egregore of liberal authoritarianism? Public Money Manag 39(1):9–17
  38. Mbanda V, Fourie W (2019) The 2030 agenda and coherent national development policy: in dialogue with South African policymakers on policy coherence for sustainable development. Sustain Dev 28(4):751–758
  39. Melkers JE, Willoughby KG (2001) Budgeters’ views of state performance- budgeting systems: distinctions across branches. Public Adm Rev 61(1):54–64
  40. Moghimi M, Pour Azzat AA, DanaeeFard H, Ahmadi H (2017) Describing elements of good governance in policy making of budgeting system in Iran. J Strateg Studies of Public Policy 6(21):31–52. [in Persian]
  41. Mirzamani A., Eshaghi, M., and Kadkhoda, N. (2019). Practical Guide to Drafting National Programs with Emphasis on Improving Implementation. Tehran: Public Administration Training Center. [in Persian]
  42. Ortynsky S, Marshall J, Mou H (2021) Budget practices in Canada’s K-12 education sector: incremental, performance, or productivity budgeting? Can Pub Adm Adm Publique Du Canada 64(1):74–98
  43. Pal LA, Clark ID (2015) Making reform stick: Political acumen as an element of political capacity for policy change and innovation. Policy Soc 34(3–4):247–257
  44. Pakmaram A, Esgandari K, BabaeiKoshteli H, Khalili M (2012) Identifying and prioritizing effective factors in the performance based budgeting in telecommunications company with TOPSIS method. Afr J Bus Manage 6(24):7344–7353.
  45. Pillary (2008) A cultural ecology of new public management soma pillay. Int Rev Adm Sci 74(3):373–394
  46. Prime Minister Strategy Unit. (2004). Strategy Survival Guide, 208 Pages, Available: https:// webar chive. natio nalar chives. gov. uk
  47. Reddy P, Kauzya JM (2015) Local Government capacity in the Southern African Development Community (SADC) Region. Pub Policy Adm 14(3):200–224
  48. Rezaei M (2016) Operational budgeting requirements in Iran. Q J Pub Law 51(18):55–81. [in Persian]
  49. Rhodes RAW (1994) The hollowing out of the state: the changing nature of the public service in Britain. Pol Q 65(1):138–151
  50. Roberts J (2004) Managing development for results: a role for resultsoriented public expenditure management. Dev Policy Rev 22(6):623–651
  51. Seidel T, Vakkuri J (2015) Institutional change of quasi-market arrangements in local public transportation – Comparative Observations from Germany and Finland. Hrvatska i Komparativna Javna Uprava 15(3):595–615
  52. Sezen S (2011) International versus domestic explanations of administrative reforms: the case of Turkey. Int Rev Adm Sci
  53. 77(2):322–346
  54. Tat-Kei Ho A (2011) PBB in American local governments: it’s more than a management tool. Public Adm Rev 71(3):391–401
  55. Tirandaz, A., Farhadi-Mahali, A.; Maatufi, A. and Tabari, M. (2013). Design and validation of a model for improving the capacity of policy-making in the country's skills training. Quarterly Journal of Skill Training, 39(10) : 71-104. [in Persian]
  56. Tiernan A (2015) The dilemmas of organisational capacity. Policy Soc 34(3–4):209–217
  57. Wellstead AM, Stedman C (2010) Policy capacity and incapacity in Canada’s federal government: the intersection of policy analysis and street-level bureaucracy. Pub Manag Rev 12(6):893–910
  58. Wildavsky A (1961) Political implications of budgetary reform. Public Adm Rev 21(4):183–190
  59. Wu X, Ramesh M, Howlett M (2015) Policy capacity: a conceptual framework for understanding policy competences and capabilities. Policy Soc 34(3–4):165–171
  60. Yin RK (2003) Case study research, design and methods, 3rd edn. Sage Publication, Inc., California.
سیاستگذاری عمومی
دوره 12، شماره 2
تابستان 1405
صفحه 220-233