The Policy Analysis of Fleet Delays at Road Border Terminals: Revealing Institutional Disharmony

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Master of Public Policy, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor of Public Policy, Command and Staff University of the Islamic Republic of Iran Army, Tehran, Iran

10.22059/jppolicy.2026.106368

Abstract

Border terminals, as gateways to international trade, hold a strategic position in trade policy and economic development. Using a grounded theory approach and relying on thematic analysis of field data and interviews with operational and academic experts, this study examines the mechanisms influencing fleet delays at the country’s road border crossings. The findings indicate that a combination of causal factors such as infrastructural deficiencies, procedural centralization, limited human resources, and neighbor states’ agency contextual factors including fragmented and overlapping regulations and socio‑cultural characteristics, and intervening factors like management quality and technological gaps, intensify institutional disharmony and reduce operational efficiency. The derived model explains the interrelations and impacts of these factors on fleet stoppage time. Based on this model, strategies such as establishing integrated border management, modernizing digital infrastructure, and redesigning institutional mapping are proposed, aiming to enhance institutional cohesion, reduce delays, and strengthen the competitive capacity of road border terminals.

Keywords

References

  1. Amiri, B., Danaei, H., Parhizkar, M. M., & Hosseini, M. H. (2020). Presenting a model for facilitating cross-border trade in Iran. Scientific Journal of Business Management Explorations, 13(26), Autumn & Winter, 1–20. [In Persian]
  2. Houshmand-Mahmoud, M., Mahdavi-Adeli, M. H., & Elahi, S. (2007). The impact of road transport infrastructure on interregional trade between Iran and ECO countries. [In Persian]
  3. Moshfegh, Z. (2020). Vulnerabilities in transit and transportation of Iran–Turkey border terminals. Economic Security Scientific Monthly, 8(11), 43–60. [In Persian]
  4. Molaei-Nasab, S., & Foori, H. R. (2024). Management of land border terminals in Iran: Reviewing challenges and explaining the role of the National Border Headquarters. Monthly Report of the Parliamentary Research Center, 22(7). [In Persian]
  5. Road Maintenance and Transportation Organization of Iran. (2023). Performance report of the Road Maintenance and Transportation Organization of Iran: Management dashboard system of the Ministry of Roads and Urban Development, 1402 (2023). [In Persian]
  6. Charmaz, K. (2024). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis (3rd ed.). Sage.
  7. Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2007). The whole‐of‐government approach to public sector reform. Public Administration Review, 67(6), 1059–1066.
  8. Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2023). The whole‐of‐government approach: New perspectives on public sector coordination. Public Administration Review.
  9. Cole, D. H., & McGinnis, M. D. (2023). Elinor Ostrom and the Bloomington School: Building a new approach to policy and governance. Cambridge University Press.
  10. Corbin, J. (2021). Strauss’s grounded theory. In Developing grounded theory (pp. 25–44). Routledge.
  11. Corbin, J. M. (1997). Grounded theory in practice. Sage.
  12. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2023). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (5th ed.). Sage.
  13. East, R. M. (2009). Doing business 2020.
  14. Harris, P., Bitonti, A., Fleisher, C. S., & Binderkrantz, A. S. (2022). The Palgrave encyclopedia of interest groups, lobbying and public affairs. Springer.
  15. Hummels (2007); MacMap HS6; World Bank. (2007). Doing business 2007.
  16. Hummels, D., Minor, P., Reisman, M., & Endean, E. (2007). Calculating tariff equivalents for time in trade. USAID Report, March.
  17. Lægreid, P., Randma-Liiv, T., Rykkja, L. H., & Sarapuu, K. (2016). Coordination challenges and administrative reforms. In Public administration reforms in Europe (pp. 244–258). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  18. Lee, K. J. (2011). From interpersonal networks to inter‐organizational alliances for university–industry collaborations in Japan: The case of the Tokyo Institute of Technology. R&D Management, 41(2), 190–201.
  19. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2023). Naturalistic inquiry (Revised ed.). Sage.
  20. North, D. C. (2023). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance (Revised ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  21. Ojala, L., & Celebi, D. (2015). The World Bank’s logistics performance index (LPI) and drivers of logistics performance. Proceeding of MAC-EMM, 1 OECD, 3–30.
  22. Ojala, L., & Celebi, D. (2023). Logistics performance and trade facilitation: Global perspectives. Journal of Supply Chain Management.
  23. Southern California Association of Governments. (2018). Goods movement border crossing study and analysis: Phase II (revised 2018) [Executive summary]. SCAG.
  24. S. Department of Transportation. (2023). Improving cross-border mobility and trade: Momentum toolkit for border planning. Office of the Secretary, Momentum Program.
  25. World Bank. (2020). Doing business 2020 indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  26. World Bank. (2023). LPI global rankings. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  27. Zaki, M., & Al-Witri, J. (2024). Smart border management: Leveraging technology for efficient trade facilitation. Journal of International Trade and Logistics
Iranian Journal of Public Policy
Volume 12, Issue 1
March 2026
Pages 51-69

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics