سیاستگذاری عمومی

سیاستگذاری عمومی

تحلیل سیاست‌های حمایت از بازارسازی فناوری نانو در ایران.

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
کیارش فرتاش 1
پریسا نواب ایرانی 2
غلامحسن خورشیدی 3
1 استادیار مدیریت تکنولوژی، پژوهشکده مطالعات بنیادین علم و فناوری، تهران، ایران
2 کارشناس ارشد مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران
3 استاد مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران
10.22059/jppolicy.2025.105199
چکیده
هدف پژوهش حاضر، ارائه چارچوب و تحلیل وضعیت سیاست‌های حمایت از بازارسازی فناوری نانو در ایران می باشد. قلمرو زمانی این پژوهش از ابتدای دهه 1380 تا سال 1402 و قلمرو موضوعی آن سیاست ­های حمایت از بازارسازی فناوری نانو در ایران است. پژوهش حاضر کیفی و از حیث هدف توصیفی با جهت ­گیری کاربردی است. داده‌های اولیه از طریق مصاحبه­ نیمه ­ساختار­یافته با 22 نفر از خبرگان جمع ­آوری گردید. داده ­های ثانویه مورد استفاده در این پژوهش شامل اسناد ملی فناوری نانو، گزارش ­ها و کتاب های مرتبط و مطالب موجود در پایگاه­ های اینترنتی ستاد نانو است. تحلیل داده‌ها از طریق تحلیل محتوای کیفی صورت پذیرفته است. براساس یافته ها 12 ابزار سیاستی بازارسازی فناوری نانو شامل ترویج مزایا و کاربردهای فناوری نانو، اعطای تسهیلات مالی (وام و لیزینگ) و یارانه، حمایت از توسعه زیرساخت­­ ها، طرح­ ها و پروژه­ های توسعه محصول، توسعه زیرساخت­ های فناوری، ارائه مشوق­ و حمایت از تحقیق و توسعه، اهرم کردن استاندارد، تنظیم ­گری و قانون گذاری برای توسعه بازار و نفوذ فناوری نانو، قیمت‌گذاری و حمایت تعرفه‌ای، پیش خرید/ خرید تضمینی، اهرم کردن خریدهای دولتی (تدارکات عمومی)، به­ هم­رسانی طرف عرضه و تقاضای فناوری نانو و حمایت از صادرات مورد استفاده قرار گرفته است. علی‌رغم سابقه نسبتاً طولانی و تلاش مستمر سیاستی برای توسعه فناوری نانو، بر اساس ارزیابی اثربخشی ابزارهای بازارسازی، به جز ابزار ترویج مزایا و کاربردهای فناوری نانو، اثربخشی سایر ابزارها متوسط به پایین می‌باشد که نشان دهنده لزوم توجه بیشتر سیاستگذاران به بازارسازی فناوری نانو به صورت خاص و بازارسازی فناوری‌های نوظهور و برافکن به صورت عام در ایران است.
کلیدواژه‌ها
بازارسازی
سیاست بازارسازی
بازارسازی فناوری نانو
  1. Ahmadvand, E., Salami, S. R., Bamdad Soofi, J. and Tabatabaeian, S. H. (2018). Policy instruments for catch-up in the nanocoatings industry in Iran. Iranian Journal of Public Policy, 4(1), 36-60. [In Persian].
  2. Akintoye, A., Hardcastle, C., Beck, M., Chinyio, E., & Asenova, D. (2003). Achieving best value in private finance initiative project procurement. Construction management and economics, 21(5), 461-470. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144619032000087285
  3. Allan, J. E., Ferreri, A., Grande, S., Giannantonio, R., & Matteucci, F. (2019). Technology transfer in nanotechnology. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. Accessible at: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/196263592.pdf
  4. Amsden, A. H. (2004). Import substitution in high-tech industries: Prebisch lives in Asia!. Cepal Review. Accessible at: https://repositorio.cepal.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/a249ca10-7d10-453c-9029-29395b7f6892/content
  5. Asadifard, R. and Mazarei, S. H. (2019). Analyzing the Intra-Network Relationships of the Members of Science and Technology Collaborative Networks Using Social Networks Analysis (Case of Study: Iran Nanotechnology Laboratory Network). Iranian Journal of Public Policy, 5(1), 117-145.
  6. Bachmann, G., & Brand, L. (2015). Governmental Strategy for the Support of Nanotechnology in Germany. The Nano‐Micro Interface: Bridging the Micro and Nano Worlds, 19-36. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527679195.ch2
  7. Belk, R. (2007). Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods in Marketing, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Pub.
  8. Bellucci, A., Pennacchio, L., & Zazzaro, A. (2019). Public R&D subsidies: collaborative versus individual place-based programs for SMEs. Small Business Economics, 52, 213-240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0017-5
  9. Bhatia, P., Vasaikar, S., & Wali, A. (2018). A landscape of nanomedicine innovations in India. Nanotechnology Reviews, 7(2), 131-148. https://doi.org/10.1515/ntrev-2017-0196
  10. Blind, K. (2013). The impact of standardization and standards on innovation: compendium of evidence on the effectiveness of innovation policy intervention. Manchester Institute of Innovation Research, Manchester, UK. Accessible at: https://media.nesta.org.uk/documents/the_impact_of_standardization_and_standards_on_innovation.pdf
  11. Boon, W., & Edler, J. (2018). Demand, challenges, and innovation. Making sense of new trends in innovation policy. Science and Public Policy, 45(4), 435-447. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scy014
  12. Boon, W. P., Edler, J., & Robinson, D. K. (2022). Conceptualizing market formation for transformative policy. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 42, 152-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2021.12.010
  13. Brown, N., Knee, P., & Blind, K. (2022). The Role of Standardisation in Support of Emerging Technologies in the UK. Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy. Accessible at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6297a1458fa8f50390d4500b/role-of-standardisation-in-support-of-emerging-technologies-uk.pdf
  14. Connolly, R. (2013). State industrial policy in Russia: the nanotechnology industry. Post-Soviet Affairs, 29(1), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2013.778545
  15. Cozzens, S. E., Bobb, K., & Bortagaray, I. (2002). Evaluating the distributional consequences of science and technology policies and programs. Research Evaluation, 11(2), 101-107. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154402781776899
  16. Creutzig, F., Fernandez, B., Haberl, H., Khosla, R., Mulugetta, Y., & Seto, K. C. (2016). Beyond technology: demand-side solutions for climate change mitigation. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 41. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085428
  17. Czarnitzki, D., Hanel, P., & Rosa, J. M. (2011). Evaluating the impact of R&D tax credits on innovation: A microeconometric study on Canadian firms. Research policy, 40(2), 217-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.017
  18. Dmitriev, O. N., and S. V. Novikov. "Fundamentals of machine-tool leasing in the Russian high-tech industry." Russian Engineering Research 40, no. 7 (2020): 575-576. https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068798X20070096
  19. (2006). Transition Report 2006, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, London. Accessible at: https://www.ebrd.com/downloads/research/transition/TR06.pdf
  20. Edler, J. (2013). Review of policy measures to stimulate private demand for innovation. Concepts and effects. Compendium of evidence on the effectiveness of innovation policy intervention, 13, 44. Accessible at: https://media.nesta.org.uk/documents/review_of_policy_measures_to_stimulate_private_demand_for_innovation._concepts_and_effects.pdf
  21. Edler, J., & Yeow, J. (2016). Connecting demand and supply: The role of intermediation in public procurement of innovation. Research policy, 45(2), 414-426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.10.010
  22. Fartash, K., Mohseni Kiasari, M. and Mesma Khosroshahi, E. (2021). Analyzing Policy Instruments Used in Technological Collaboration of 3 Large Firms with Small Technology-based Firms. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 14(3), 2-18. [In Persian].
  23. Foulkes, R., Man, E., Thind, J., Yeung, S., Joy, A., & Hoskins, C. (2020). The regulation of nanomaterials and nanomedicines for clinical application: Current and future perspectives. Biomaterials science, 8(17), 4653-4664. https://doi.org/1039/D0BM00558D
  24. Garmaev, B. (2022). State support for exports in industry: China's experience. Теория и практика современной науки, (8 (86)), 8-14. Accessible at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/state-support-for-exports-in-industry-chinas-experience
  25. Ghasemzadeh, A. (2018). Breaking the Cocoon (Narrative of Nanotechnology Standardization Experiences and Policies in Iran). Author's Publication. [In Persian].
  26. Inshakova, E., Inshakov, O., & Orlova, A. (2017). Global and Russian nanotechnology product market development: comparison of trends and impact of sanctions. International Journal of Trade and Global Markets, 10(2-3), 226-235. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTGM.2017.086077
  27. Institute of Business Studies and Research (IBSR). (2017). Integrating Industrial, Commercial and Technological Policies in Iran's Biopharmaceutical Industry. Research Project Report. Tehran. Iran. [In Persian].
  28. Intarakumnerd, P., & Goto, A. (2016). Technology and innovation policies for small and medium-sized enterprises in East Asia. Accessible at: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/161454/1/865238588.pdf
  29. Jarvis, D. S., & Richmond, N. (2011). Regulation and governance of nanotechnology in China: Regulatory challenges and effectiveness. European Journal of Law and Technology, 2(3). Accessible at: https://www.ejlt.org/index.php/ejlt/article/download/94/155?inline=1
  30. Jin, Z., Shang, Y., & Xu, J. (2018). The impact of government subsidies on private R&D and firm performance: does ownership matter in China’s manufacturing industry?. Sustainability, 10(7), 2205. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072205
  31. Jinjin, L., & Hong, Z. (2010). The empirical analysis of tariff protection of high-tech industry. In 2010 International Conference on Education and Management Technology (pp. 305-308). IEEE. https://doi.org/1109/ICEMT.2010.5657648
  32. Kazemi Azar, S. (2019). Designing Nanotechnology Commercialization Policies Based on Supporting Start-Up Companies and Challenges in Iran. Science and Technology Policy Letters, 08(4), 17-32. [In Persian].
  33. Lember, V., Cepilovs, A., & Kattel, R. (2013). Demand-side innovation policy in Estonia: rationales, limits and future paths (No. 56). TUT Ragnar Nurkse Department of Innovation and Governance. Accessible at: B2n.ir/x42836
  34. Lin, J. L., & Jang, G. W. (2004). Opportunities for Taiwan's industry. Materials Today, 7(12), 36-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(04)00629-7
  35. Lipsey, R. G., Carlaw, K. I., & Bekar, C. T. (2005). Economic transformations: general purpose technologies and long-term economic growth. Oup Oxford. Accessible at: B2n.ir/n10388
  36. Liu, L. (2015). Overview on nanotechnology R&D and commercialization in the Asia Pacific region. The Nano‐Micro Interface: Bridging the Micro and Nano Worlds, 37-54. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527679195.ch3
  37. Mazzucato, M. (2024). Collective value creation: a new approach to stakeholder value. International Review of Applied Economics, 38(1-2), 43-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/02692171.2022.2144149
  38. Mazzucato, M. (2016). From market fixing to market-creating: a new framework for innovation policy. Industry and Innovation, 23(2), 140-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2016.1146124
  39. Mazzucato, M., & Semieniuk, G. (2017). Public financing of innovation: new questions. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 33(1), 24-48. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grw036
  40. Mohammadi, M, Tabatabaeian, S, Elyasi, M, & Roshani, S. (2013). Formation of Emerging Technological Innovation System in Iran; Case of Nanotechnology Sector. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 6(2), 19-32. [In Persian].
  41. Nanotechnology Development Council (NDC). (2022a). 20-Year Performance Report on the Promotion of Nanotechnology in the Islamic Republic of Iran (2001-2020). Tehran, Iran. Available at: https://news.nano.ir/wp-content/uploads/nanonews-20230119-091003.pdf. [In Persian].
  42. Nanotechnology Development Council (NDC). (2022b). Report on the Implementation of the Nanotechnology Application Expansion Document in 2021. Tehran, Iran. Available at: https://news.nano.ir/wp-content/uploads/nanonews-20230509-065929.pdf. [In Persian].
  43. Narimani, M, Shalbafi, M. and Farzaneh, S. (2018). Public Procurement as Technology and Innovation Policy Tool: A Case Study of Iran-Lab-Expo. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 11(4), 17-35. [In Persian].
  44. National Science and Technology Council (NSTC). (2021). National Nanotechnology Initiative Strategic Plan. (2021). Washington, D.C. Accessible at: https://www.nano.gov/sites/default/files/pub_resource/NNI-2021-Strategic-Plan.pdf
  45. National Science and Technology Council (NSTC). (2023). The National Nanotechnology Initiative Supplement to The President’s 2023 Budget. Washington, D.C. Accessible at: https://www.nano.gov/sites/default/files/pub_resource/NNI-FY23-Budget-Supplement.pdf
  46. Norgren, L., Nilsson, R., Perez, E., Pohl, H., Sandström, A., & Sandgren, P. (2007). Needs driven R&D programmes in sectorial innovation systems. Vinnova Publication. Accessible at: https://www.vinnova.se/contentassets/11e90dd460d54510a4819b897921f4e1/va-07-15.pdf
  47. (2011), Demand-side Innovation Policies, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264098886-en
  48. (2014), "Intelligent Demand: Policy Rationale, Design and Potential Benefits", OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, No. 13, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/5jz8p4rk3944-en
  49. OFT (Office of Fair Trading). (2009). Government in Markets: Why Competition Matters–A Guide for Policy Makers. Accessible at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/284451/OFT1113.pdf
  50. Perez, E., & Sandgren, P. (2008). Nanotechnology in Sweden: An innovation system approach to an emerging area. Stockholm: VINNOVA. Accessible at: https://www.vinnova.se/contentassets/5bd14e90449b424392090dc66e0d7768/va-08-03.pdf
  51. Rigby, J. (2013). Review of pre-commercial procurement approaches and effects on innovation. Compendium of Evidence on the Effectiveness of Innovation Policy Intervention. Manchester Institute of Innovation Research, Manchester Business School. Accessible at: https://media.nesta.org.uk/documents/review_of_pre-commercial_procurement_approaches_and_effects_on_innovation_revised_ajr-14-11-2013_final.pdf
  52. Rochman, N. T., & Brama, Y. L. (2009). Indonesia nanotechnology development: current status overview. In Emerging Nanotechnology Power: Nanotechnology R&D and Business Trends in the Asia Pacific Rim (pp. 141-167). https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814261555_0006
  53. Roco, M. C. (2023). National Nanotechnology Initiative at 20 years: enabling new horizons. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 25(10), 197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-023-05829-9
  54. Saldaña, Johnny. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. sage, 2021.
  55. Sharma, K. K., Tripathi, S. M., & Selvaraj, A. (2014). Emerging PPP model in science and technology in India. Accessible at: http://oar.icrisat.org/id/eprint/8494
  56. Shokri, H. , sadatrasoul, S. , Asadifard, R. and hasani, S. (2022). Identify policy tools to develop technological collaboration of large industrial companies with knowledge-based companies. Innovation Management Journal, 11(2), 147-173.
  57. Tarr, D. G. (2000). On the design of tariff policy: a practical guide to the arguments for and against uniform tariffs. World Bank. Accessible at: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/562241486624901336/pdf/111992-WP-Sept-2000-PUBLIC-WTO-HAND.pdf
  58. Tavallaie, R, & Mohammadzadeh Alamdari, M. (2017). Techniques and Tools of Research Methodology in Management. Jahad Daneshgahi Publication, Amirkabir University of Technology Unit, Tehran, Iran.
  59. United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (UNECA). (2020). Towards an African nanotechnology future: Trends, impacts and opportunities. United Nations Economic Commission for Africa, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. https://archive.uneca.org/sites/default/files/PublicationFiles/towards_african_nano_tech.pdf
  60. Wu, M. K., Su, T. T., & Song, T. T. (2009). National Nanotechnology Program In Taiwan. In Emerging Nanotechnology Power: Nanotechnology R&D and Business Trends in the Asia Pacific Rim (pp. 333-357). https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814261555_0013
  61. Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage publications.
  62. Zahedi, V. (2018). The Third Way (Narrative of the Laboratory Network Experiences and the Nanotechnology Equipment Manufacturing Program in Iran). Published by the author. [In Persian].
  63. Zhou, Y. (2008). Synchronizing export orientation with import substitution: creating competitive indigenous high-tech companies in China. World Development, 36(11), 2353-2370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.11.013
سیاستگذاری عمومی
دوره 11، شماره 4
زمستان 1404
صفحه 56-77