طراحی آمیزه سیاستی برای غلبه بر شکست‌های سیستمی نظام ملی نوآوری ایران.

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناسی‌ارشد مدیریت فناوری، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه تهران (دانشکدگان فارابی)، قم، ایران

2 دانشیار مدیریت فناوری، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه تهران (دانشکدگان فارابی)، قم، ایران

3 استادیار مدیریت فناوری، موسسه تحقیقات سیاست علمی کشور، تهران، ایران

10.22059/jppolicy.2025.105198

چکیده

وجود شکست‏ های گوناگون در نظام نوآوری ایران، لزوم سیاستگذاری دقیق و هدفمند برای غلبه بر این شکست ­ها را ایجاب می ­کند. اما با توجه به پیچیدگی روزافزون مسائل سیاستی، ضروری است آمیزه­ای از ابزارهای سیاستی طراحی شود که در تعامل با یکدیگر بیشترین تأثیر مثبت ممکن بر اهداف سیاستی را داشته باشند. در این پژوهش، با استفاده از نظرات خبرگان و به‌کارگیری روش تحلیل مضمون، شکست­ های سیستمی نظام نوآوری ایران شناسایی و در قالب ۱۲ دسته طبقه‌بندی شد. سپس به­ کمک روش تحلیل اسنادی، مجموعه ‏ای از ابزارهای سیاستی برای غلبه بر این شکست­ ها و طراحی آمیزه سیاستی گردآوری گردید. آمیزه سیاستی پیشنهادی شامل 12 هدف کلان معادل با 12 دسته از شکست­ های سیستمی نظام نوآوری ایران، 43 هدف سیاستی متناسب با عمده شکست ­های سیستمی و ترکیبی از 111 ابزار سیاستی است. یافته‌ها نشان داد که ابزارهای پیشنهادی از سازگاری درونی و اثرات هم‌افزای قابل‌توجهی برخوردارند و تأکید بر سیاست‌های غیرمالی و اصلاح نهادی، در شرایط محدودیت منابع مالی دولت، از کارایی بیشتری برخوردار است. بر اساس نتایج، پیشنهاد می‌شود در طراحی سیاست‌های نوآوری، بر هم‌افزایی میان ابزارها، اصلاح نهادهای نرم، و ارزیابی مستمر آمیزه‌های سیاستی تأکید شود و به سمت طراحی یک آمیزه سیاستی پویا، هماهنگ و یادگیرنده حرکت گردد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

مراجع

  1. Alavi, S., Nazmfar, H. and Hasanzadeh, M. (2022). Analyzing Iran's Innovation Status in Comparison with Some Selected Countries in 2025 Vision Document. Quarterly Journal of the Macro and Strategic Policies, 10(39), 444-474. doi: 10.30507/jmsp.2022.321308.2353. {In Persian} 
  2. Alinaghian, A., Safdari Ranjbar, M. and Mohammadi, M. (2024). Designing a Policy Package for Developing Artificial Intelligence in Iran. Iranian Journal of Public Policy, (), -. doi: 10.22059/jppolicy.2021.91608. {In Persian} 
  3. Alizadeh, P. and Malekifar, F. (2019). Policy Mixes for Science, Technology, and Innovation. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 12(2), 513-526. {In Persian} 
  4. Alizadeh, P., Safdari Ranjbar, M. and Mohajeri, A. (2023). Designing a policy mix to strengthen the role of the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology in national innovation system. Journal of Improvement Management, 17(2), 88-114. doi: 10.22034/jmi.2023.399995.2970. {In Persian} 
  5. Andersson, K., Hojcková, B.A., & Sandén, B.A (2023). On the functional and structural scope of technological innovation systems – A literature review with conceptual suggestions. Environ. Innov. Soc. Trans., 49, Article 100786, 10.1016/j.eist.2023.100786
  6. Attarpour, M. R., Fartash, K., Elyasi, M. and Sadabadai, A. A. (2019). Proposing policy tools for developing production and demand of knowledge-based products using the concept of policy mix and system failures. Journal of Improvement Management, 13(2), 61-97. {In Persian} 
  7. Bessa, S., & Gouveia, J. P. (2022). A framework for policy mix analysis: assessing energy poverty policies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 12(4), 438–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/21606544.2022.2153744
  8. Borras, S, and Edquist, C, (2019). Holistic Innovation Policy: Theoretical Foundations, Policy Problems, and Instrument. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198809807.001.0001
  9. Caloffi, A & Colovic, A & Rizzoli, V & Rossi, F, (2023). Innovation intermediaries' types and functions: A computational analysis of the literature," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
  10. Capano, G., & Howlett, M. (2020). The Knowns and Unknowns of Policy Instrument Analysis: Policy Tools and the Current Research Agenda on Policy Mixes. SAGE Open, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019900568 (Original work published 2020)
  11. Chaminade, C & Edquist, C. (2005). From theory to practice: the use of systems of innovation approach in innovation policy, Papers in Innovation Studies 2005/2, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
  12. P & Edler. J. & Flanagan. K & Larédo. P, (2016). The innovation policy mix. Chapters, in: Jakob Edler & Paul Cunningham & Abdullah Gök & Philip Shapira (ed.), Handbook of Innovation Policy Impact, Edward Elgar Publishing. chapter 17, pages 505-542.
  13. Dworak, E., Grzelak, M.M., Roszko-Wójtowicz, E. (2021), Comparison of National Innovation Systems in the European Union Countries, Risks, 10 (1), 6,
  14. Esmaeili, A (2021). Survey of policy issues in the field of research, technology and innovation: in research, technology and innovation in the 7th development programs: studies, analyses and suggestions. Edited by Niloufar Redaei, National Science Policy Research Center Publications. {In Persian} 
  15. Fatemi, M. and Arasti, M. (2019). Priority-Setting in Science, Technology and Innovation. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 12(2), 119-133. {In Persian} 
  16. Flanagan, K., Uyarra, E., & Laranja, M. (2011). Reconceptualising the ‘policy mix’for innovation. Research policy, 40(5), 702-713.
  17. Ghazinoori, S. and Radaei, N. (2019). The Framework for STI Policy Programs. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 12(2), 527-542. {In Persian} 
  18. Ghazinoory, S. S., Ghazinoory, S. S., (2021). An Introduction to Science, Technology and Innovation Policy. Tarbiat Modares University Press. {In Persian} 
  19. Ghazinoory, S. S., Khaledi, A., Nasri, S. and Hoseini, H. (2021). Nanotechnology innovation system in Iran ‎Based on Functional and Structural Components. Innovation Management in Defensive Organizations, 4(1), 25-52. doi: 10.22034/qjimdo.2020.233464.1316. {In Persian} 
  20. Ghazinoory, S., Amiri, M., Ghazinoori, S., & Alizadeh, P. (2019). Designing innovation policy mix: a multi-objective decision-making approach. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 28(4), 365–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2018.1500115
  21. Guo, J and Wang, Y. (2024). Policy Instrument Mix and Firm Innovation Performance: The Moderating Role of Financial Slack. Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMPROC.2024.24bp
  22. Haji-Hosseini, H., mohammadi, M., Abbasi, F. and Elyasi, M. (2011). Analysis of Iranian Innovation System\'s Governance Based on Innovation Policy Making Cycle. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 4(3), 33-48. {In Persian} 
  23. M, Mill D, Johnson J, Lee K., (2021). Let's talk virtual! Online focus group facilitation for the modern researcher. Res Social Adm Pharm.;(12):2145-2150.
  24. Hashemi, A. and Ghasemi, Y. (2020). Doing a Research by Thematic Analysis: A Practical, Step-by-Step Guide for Learning and Teaching (Case Study: Music usage of M.A. Students at Ilam University). a scientific journal of ilam culture, 20(64.65), 7-33. {In Persian} 
  25. Hekkert, M. P., Suurs, R. A. A., Negro, S., Kuhlmann, S., & Smits, R. E. H. M. (2007). Functions of Innovation Systems: A new approach for analysing technological change. Technological forecasting and social change, 74(4), 413-432.
  26. Hesabi, F., & Kheradmand Nia, S. (2022). On the path of knowledge-based and job-creating production: Institutional pathology of science and technology commercialization system in the country. Tehran: Islamic Council Research Center. {In Persian} 
  27. Howoldt, D. (2021). Policy Instruments and Policy Mixes for Innovation: Analysing Their Relation to Grand Challenges, Entrepreneurship and Innovation Capability with Natural Language Processing and Latent Variable Methods. Copenhagen Business School [Phd]. PhD Series No. 38.2021
  28. Howlett, M., & Rayner, J. (2013). Patching vs packaging in policy formulation: Assessing policy portfolio design. Politics and Governance, 1(2), 170-182.
  29. Howoldt, D. (2024). Characterising innovation policy mixes in innovation systems. Research Policy, 53(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/1016/j.respol.2023.104902
  30. Kalantari, E., Montazer, G. and Ghazinoory, S. (2021). Clustering the Prevailing Discourses about the Appropriate Structure for Science and Technology Policy in Iran by Using the FCM Algorithm. Majlis and Rahbord, 28(108), 323-356. doi: 10.22034/mr.2021.4039.4043. {In Persian} 
  31. Karimi, AmirAli, Maleki, Ali. (2023). Examining the Status of Iran in the Global Innovation Index. Roshd -e- Fanavari ,73 () ,51-58. {In Persian} 
  32. Karimmian, Z. and Falahati, N. (2022). Investigating the governance structure in technology and innovation policy in Iran based on policy networks analysis. Innovation Management Journal, 11(2), 1-26. {In Persian} 
  33. Kheradmand Nia, S. (2025). Review of the Second Part of the National Budget Bill for the Year 2025 (19): Budget Allocations for Technology Development and Knowledge-Based Activities. (20437). Reports, 32(11), 20437 doi: 10.22034/report.mrc.2025.1403.32.11.20437. {In Persian}
  34. Laasonen, V., Kolehmainen, J., & Sotarauta, M. (2020). The complexity of contemporary innovation policy and its governance in Finland. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 35(4), 547–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2020.1842176
  35. Miremadi, S. I. (2019). National Innovation System and Its Role in Improving Science, Technology and Innovation Policies. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 12(2), 135-154. {In Persian} 
  36. Mohammad Aliha, M. R. (2020). Identify and prioritize macro indicators of innovation governance. Journal of Strategic Management Studies, 11(43), 113-138. {In Persian} 
  37. Mohammadi, A., pashotany zadeh, H. and namdar javimi, E. (2019). -Identification and evaluation of systematic problems in the national innovation system of Iran. Innovation Management in Defensive Organizations, 1(2), 28-50. {In Persian} 
  38. Mohseni Kiasari, M., Mohammadi, M., Jafarnejad, A., Garousi Mokhtarzadeh, N. and Asadifard, R. (2017). Classification of Demand-based Innovation Policy Tools Using Meta-Synthesis Approach. Innovation Management Journal, 6(2), 109-138. {In Persian} 
  39. G and Ricardo, M. (2024). Science, technology and innovation policy instruments for the Sustainable Development Goals: a global outlook. Book in UNESCO Publishing. https://doi.org/10.54677/NPJX8363
  40. Mousavi, A. and ahmadi, H. (2020). Extracting the main features of Iran's national innovation system through a systematic mix of research. Strategic Studies of public policy, 10(34), 102-127. {In Persian} 
  41. Mulligan, K; Lenihan, H; Doran, J (2017). Innovation policy instrument mix: unravelling the knowns and unknowns. University of Limerick. Conference contribution. https://hdl.handle.net/10344/6315
  42. Namdarian, L. and Naghizadeh, R. (2019). Strategic Intelligence in Science, Technology and Innovation Policy Making (STI). Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 12(2), 87-101. {In Persian} 
  43. Negro, S O. & Hekkert, Marko P. & Smits, Ruud E., (2007). Explaining the failure of the Dutch innovation system for biomass digestion--A functional analysis, Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2).
  44. Norouzi, E., Tabatabaeeian, S. H. and Ghazinoori, S. S. (2016). Assessing the Effect of Intermediary Institutions in Addressing the Weaknesses of the NIS Functions of Iran. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 9(1), 15-26. {In Persian} 
  45. Norouzi, N., Elahi, S., Hasanzade, A. and Hajihoseini, H. (2014). Proposing a Framework of Science and Technology Policy Instruments Based on Meta-Synthesis Approach. Innovation Management Journal, 3(2), 103-124. {In Persian} 
  46. Nykamp H. Policy Mix for a Transition to Sustainability: Green Buildings in Norway. Sustainability. 2020; 12(2):446. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020446
  47. D. Reike. D. and Bening. C (2025). Analyzing policy mixes for the circular economy transition: The case of recycled plastics in electronics. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions. 50(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2025.100982
  48. Pham, H, Hoang, V, Yu, M, & McLennan, C.(2024) Dynamic efficiency of Australia's innovation systems: A regional and state analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 205, No: 123470.
  49. Ponta, L. M., Puliga, G., Manzini, R., & Cincotti, S. (2024). Reacting and recovering after an innovation failure: an agent-based approach. Technovation, 129(January 2024), 1–10.
  50. Safdari Ranjbar, M., Rajabzadeh, M. and Mohammadhashemi, Z. (2024). Exploration of the Challenges Facing Innovation and Business Accelerators in Iran. Innovation Management Journal, 13(3), 133-170. doi: 10.22034/imj.2025.494286.2875. {In Persian} 
  51. Shirzadegan, A., Safdari Ranjbar, M. and Alizadeh, P. (2025). Identification and Classification of System Failures in Iran's National Innovation System. Science and Technology Policy Letters, 15(1), 103-123.
  52. Smith, W. R., Treem, J., & Love, B. (2023). When Failure is the Only Option: How Communicative Framing Resources Organizational Innovation. International Journal of Business Communication, 60(3), 976-999.
  53. Soltani, B., Hajihoseini, H. A., Arasti, M., Ghazinoory, S., Rzavi, M., Shafiaa, M., Manteghi, M., Tabatabaeian, H. A. and Shaverdi, M. (2017). A Review on Iran’s NIS Challenges & Proposing Policies and Initiatives for Improvement. Strategic Studies of public policy, 7(23), 185-198. {In Persian} 
  54. Soltanzadeh, Javad, Heydari, Kavous, Dabbaghi, Hamideh, Ansari, Reza. (2017). A Functional Analysis of National Innovation System of IRAN. Modiriat-e- farda ,49 () ,187-204. {In Persian} 
  55. Stevenson, R., A. S. Kier, and S. G. Taylor. (2021). Do Policy Makers Take Grants for Granted? The Efficacy of Public Sponsorship for Innovative Entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 15 (2): 231–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1376.
  56. Weerasinghe R. N., Jayawardane A. K. W., & Huang Q. (2024). Critical inquiry on national innovation system: Does NIS fit with developing countries? Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship, 3(1).
  57. A, J. and Hekkert, M, P. (2012), Systemic instruments for systemic innovation problems: A framework for policy makers and innovation scholars, Science and Public Policy, 39, (1), 74-87
  58. Yousefi, H, Nasiri, H, Zeraat-Kish, Y. (1400). Proposed priorities of the higher education system and research in the Seventh Development Plan. Tehran, Iran: Research Center of the Islamic Consultative Assembly. {In Persian}
سیاستگذاری عمومی
دوره 11، شماره 4
دی 1404
صفحه 33-55

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار