فهم ابعاد سیاست‌زدگی اداره امور عمومی از منظر شهروندان

نوع مقاله: مقاله اصلی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت دولتی پردیس فارابی دانشگاه تهران

2 استاد مدیریت دولتی پردیس فارابی دانشگاه تهران

3 استاد مدیریت دولتی دانشگاه تربیت مدرس

4 استادیار مدیریت منابع انسانی پردیس فارابی دانشگاه تهران

چکیده

سیاست و اداره دو جزء اصلی هر نظام سیاسی هستند. سیاست­زدگی اداره امور عمومی پدیده‌ای است که ناشی از افزایش دخالت سیاست در امور اداره است که منجر به تغییر اهداف بخش‌ دولتی می‌شود. در پژوهش حاضر مقصود گسترش دامنه نگاه به پدیده سیاست زدگی از نگاه شهروندان به‌عنوان مهم‌ترین بازار هدف دولت است. بدین منظور با استفاده از روش پژوهش ترکیبی در مرحله نخست با انجام مصاحبه‌های کیفی و تکنیک کدگذاری و مقوله‌بندی، ابعاد، مؤلفه‌ها و شاخص‌های سیاست زدگی اداره امور عمومی از منظر شهروندان شناسایی شدند و در مرحله کمّی با استفاده از آزمون‌های آماری روایی و پایایی آنها تأیید شده و مدل نهایی در قالب چهار بعد فرهنگ، مدیریت منابع انسانی، ساختار و قوانین و مقررات، 12 مؤلفه و 38 شاخص
ارائه گردید.

کلیدواژه‌ها


الف) فارسی
1-       دانایی‌فرد، ح.، الوانی، س. م.، و آذر، ع. (1391)،  روش‌شناسی پژوهش کیفی در مدیریت: رویکردی جامع ،چاپ اول، تهران، انتشارات صفار-اشراقی.
2-       مؤمنی، م.، و فعال قیومی، ع. (1389)، تحلیل­های آماری با استفاده از SPSS ، چاپ سوم، تهران، کتاب نو.
ب) انگلیسی
3-        Aberbach, J., & Rockman, B. (1988), Image IV Revisited: Executive and Political Roles. Governance, 1 (1): 1–25.
4-        Almendares, N. (2011), Politicization of Bureaucracy. International Encyclopedia of Political Science. SAGE Publications, Inc. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
5-        Asmeron, H., & Reis. E. (1996), Democratization and Political Neutrality. London: Macmillan.
6-        BREWER, G. D. (1981), Where the Twain Meet: Reconciling science and politics in analysis, Polio' Sciences, 13: 269-279.
7-        Čehovin, M., & Haček, M. (2015). Critical Analysis of Civil Service Politicization in Slovenia. World Political Science, 11 (1): 133-155.
8-        Christensen, J. G., Klemmensen, R., & Opstrup. N. (2014). Politicization and the Replacement of Top Civil Servants in Denmark. Governance, 27 (2): 215 - 241.
9-         Creswell, J. W., & Plano, V.L. (2007), Designing& conducting mixed methods research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10-      Dahlstro¨m, C., & Lapuente, V. (2009), Explaining Cross-Country Differences in Performance-Related Pay in the Public Sector. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. OECD. 2004. Performance-related pay policies for government employees: Main trends in OECD member countries. Unclassified document.
11-      Dahlström, C. (2012). ‘Politics and Administration.’ In The Sage Handbook of Public Administration, 2nd ed. SAGE Publications Ltd.
12-      Doli, D., Korenica, F., & Rogova, A. (2012), The post-independence civil service in Kosovo: A message of politicization. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(4): 665-691.
13-      Easton, D. (1965), A Framework for Political Analysis. Englewood Cliffs.
14-      Eichbaum, C., & Shaw, R. (2008). Revisiting Politicization: Political Advisers and Public Servants in Westminster Systems. Governance 21 (3), 337-363
15-      Frease, D. E. (1975), A Politicization Paradigm: The Case of Yugoslavia.  The Sociological Quarterly, 16(1): 33-47.
16-      György, H. & Sándor, C.  (2014), When Crisis Hits Superman: Change and Stability of Political Control and Politicization in Hungary. Administrative Culture 15 (1): 39-57.
17-      Hartley, J., & Fletcher, C. (2008). ‘Leadership with Political Awareness: Leadership across Diverse Interests Inside and Outside the Organization’, in K. James and J. Collins (eds), Leadership Perspectives: Knowledge into Action. London: Palgrave, pp. 157–70.
18-      Hartley, J., Alford, J., Hughes, O., & Yates, S. (2015), Public Value and Political Astuteness in the Work of Public Managers: The Art of the Possible. Public Administration, 93 (1): 195–211.
19-      Iancu, D.C. (2013), European Compliance and Politicization of Public Administration in Romania. Innovative Issues and Approaches in Social Sciences, 6(1): 103-117.
20-      Imtiyaz, A. (2014), Buddhism and electoral politics in Sri Lanka politicization, tensions and de-politicization of Buddhism. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 49(3): 315-331.
21-      Lasswell, H. D. (1935). World Politics and Personal Insecurity. New York.
22-      Lawshe, C. H. (1975), A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4): 563-575.
23-      Leftwich, A. (2004), What is Politics? Cambridge: Polity Press
24-      Lewis, B.R., Snyder, C.A., & Rainer, K.R. Jr. (1995), An empirical assessment of the information resource management construct. Journal of Management Information Systems 12 (1): 199-223.
25-      Mayntz, R., & Derlien, HU. (1989), Party patronage and politicization of the West German administrative elite 1970–1987 – Towards hybridization? Governance, 2(4): 384–404.
26-      Mulgan, R. (1998), Politicization of the senior appointments in the Australian public services.  Australian Journal of Public Administration, 57(3): 3–14.
27-      Overeem, P. (2012). The Politics-Administration Dichotomy: Toward a Constitutional Perspective. Second Edition, CRC Press.
28-      Oyedeji, B. (2016), Politicization of the civil service: implications for good governance. International Journal of Innovative Social Sciences & Humanities Research, 4(1): 1-16.
29-      Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (2004), Politicization of the Civil Service in Comparative Perspective: The quest for control (Routledge Studies in Governance and Public Policy) (pp. 1-13). London & New York: Taylor & Francis e-Library.
30-      Peters, B.G. (2012), Politicisation: What is it and why should we care? In: Vanhoonacker S, Verhey L and Neuhold C (eds) Civil Servants and Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan (forthcoming).
31-      Resources Management construct. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12 (1): 199-223.
32-      Rouban, L. (2012), ‘Politicization of the Civil Service.’ In The SAGE Handbook of Public Administration, 2nd ed. SAGE Publications Ltd.
33-      Rugge, F. (2011), ‘Administrative Legacies in Western Europe’, in B. G. Peters and  J. Pierre, The SAGE Handbook of Public Administration, SAGE Publications, Inc, pp. 228-240.
34-      Saldana, J. (2009), The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers, SAGE Publications Ltd.
35-      Schwanke, K., & Ebinger, F. (2006), Politisierung und Rollenverständnis der deutschen Administrativen Elite 1970 bis 2005. Wandel trotz Kontinuität. Politische Vierteljahresschrift (PVS). Sonderheft 37: Politik und Verwaltung, 228–249.
36-      Smith, M. (2011), ‘The Paradoxes of Britain’s Strong Centre: Delegating Decisions and Reclaiming Control’, in Carl Dahlström, B. Guy Peters and Jon Pierre (eds), Steering from the Centre: Strengthening Political Control in Western Democracies Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
37-      Stahlberg, K. (1986). The politicization of recruitment to central public administration in Finland. Statsvetenskaplig tidskrifts arkiv , 89 (3):159-167.
38-      Stoker, G. (2006), Why Politics Matters. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
39-      Straub, D., Boudreau, M-C., & Gefen, D. (2004), Validation guidelines for IS positivist research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 13: 380-427.
40-      Van der Meer, F. M., Steen, T., & Wille, A. (2007), ‘Western European civil service systems: A comparative analysis.’ In The Civil Service in the 21st Century: Comparative Perspective, ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
41-      Weiden, D. (2011), Judicial Politicization, Ideology, and Activism at the High Courts of the United States, Canada, and Australia. Political Research Quarterly, 64(2): 335-347.
42-      Weller, P. (1989), Politicization and the Australian Public Service. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 48(4): 369-381.