تبیین خرده‌نظام سیاستی دریاچه ارومیه بر مبنای چارچوب ائتلاف‌های حامی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری خط‌مشی‌گذاری عمومی، گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران.

2 استادیار گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

هدف از این پژوهش، بررسی خرده­نظام سیاستی دریاچه ارومیه با به‌کارگیری چارچوب ائتلاف‌های حامی است. در این پژوهش، ائتلاف­های فعال در خرده­نظام سیاستی دریاچه ارومیه، باورها و منابع آن‌ها با رویکرد کیفی شناسایی‌شده است. جامعه آماری این پژوهش، افراد آشنا با خرده­نظام سیاستی دریاچه ارومیه و اسناد مکتوب در این زمینه بوده است. نمونه­گیری با روش گلوله برفی انجام شده است و اطلاعات از طریق مصاحبه و مطالعه اسناد، جمع­آوری و با روش تحلیل محتوا، کدگذاری شده است. مهم­ترین نتایج این پژوهش، شناسایی سه ائتلاف حامی مدیریت زیست بومی، ائتلاف حامی رویکرد مهندسی و ضرب‌الاجلی و ائتلاف بالقوه سمن­های زیست‌محیطی است. نوع فعالیت این سه ائتلاف را می‌توان با ویژگی­های خرده­نظام سیاستی خط­مشی­گذاری متعارض، تبیین کرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

مراجع

  1. Abbasi, T., DanaeiFard, H. (2014). Advocacy Coalition Framework and explanation of Policy Change; The law of Goals, Functions and Structure of Ministry of Science, Research and Technology. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 7(3), 1-17(In Persian).
  2. Bozorg-Haddad, O., Dehghan, P., Zolghadr-Asli, B., Singh, V. P., Chu, X., & Loáiciga, H. A. (2022). System dynamics modeling of lake water management under climate change. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 5828. Doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09212-x
  3. Cohen, N., & Arieli, T. (2011). Field research in conflict environments: Methodological challenges and snowball sampling. Journal of peace research, 48(4), 423-435. Doi.org/10.1177/0022343311405.
  4. D'amato, G., & Cecchi, L. (2008). Effects of climate change on environmental factors in respiratory allergic diseases. Clinical & Experimental Allergy, 38(8), 1264-1274 Doi: 1111/j.1365-2222.2008.03033.x
  5. Danesh-Yazdi, M., & Ataie-Ashtiani, B. (2019). Lake Urmia crisis and restoration plan: Planning without appropriate data and model is gambling. Journal of Hydrology, 576, 639-651. Doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.06.068.
  6. Ebrahimi, S.A., Farhadinejad, M., Baki Hashemi, M.(2020). Policy Analysis of the Health System Based on the Advocacy Coalition Frameworks (Case Study: Iran's Health system Reform plan). Strategic Studies Quarterly, 22(2), 95-112(In Persian).
  7. Elo, S., Kääriäinen, M., Kanste, O., Pölkki, T., Utriainen, K., & Kyngäs, H. (2014). Qualitative Content Analysis: A Focus on Trustworthiness. SAGE Open, 4(1).  Doi: 10.1177/2158244014522633
  8. Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of advanced nursing, 62(1), 107-115. Doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x.
  9. Esmailzadeh, S., Parvaresh Rizi, A., Mianabadi, H.(2021). Problem cognition and policy evaluation of Urmia Lake Restoration Program. Strategic Studies of Public Policy, 11(38), 38-58(In Persian).
  10. Fathian, F., Modarres, R., & Dehghan, Z. (2016). Urmia Lake water-level change detection and modeling. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2, 1-16. Doi: 10.1007/s40808-016-0253-0
  11. Feizizadeh, B., Lakes, T., Omarzadeh, D., & Pourmoradian, S. (2023). Health effects of shrinking hyper-saline lakes: spatiotemporal modeling of the Lake Urmia drought on the local population, case study of the Shabestar County. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 1622. Doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-28332-6.
  12. Feizizadeh, B., Lakes, T., Omarzadeh, D., Sharifi, A., Blaschke, T., & Karimzadeh, S. (2022). Scenario-based analysis of the impacts of lake drying on food production in the Lake Urmia Basin of Northern Iran. Scientific reports, 12(1), 6237 Doi: 1038/s41598-022-10159-2.
  13. Gabehart, K. M., Nam, A., & Weible, C. M. (2022). Lessons from the Advocacy Coalition Framework for climate change policy and politics. Climate Action, 1(1), 13.Doi:10.1007/s11615-022-00399-2.
  14. Ghaedi, M.R., Golshani, A.(2016). Content analysis method, from quantitative to qualitative, Psychological Methods and Models, 7(23), 57-82(In Persian).
  15. Graneheim, U. H., Lindgren, B. M., & Lundman, B. (2017). Methodological challenges in qualitative content analysis: A discussion paper. Nurse education today, 56, 29-34. Doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.06.002.
  16. Gronow, A., & Ylä‐Anttila, T. (2019). Cooptation of ENGOs or treadmill of production? Advocacy coalitions and climate change policy in Finland. Policy Studies Journal, 47(4), 860-881.‏ Doi: 10.1111/psj.12185
  17. Heinmiller, B. T. (2013). Advocacy Coalitions and the Alberta" Water Act". Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique, 525-547., Doi: 1017/S0008423913000541
  18. Jenkins‐Smith, H., Silva, C. L., Gupta, K., & Ripberger, J. T. (2014). Belief system continuity and change in policy advocacy coalitions: Using cultural theory to specify belief systems, coalitions, and sources of change. Policy Studies Journal, 42(4), 484-508, Doi: 10.1111/psj.12071
  19. Johnson, T. P. (2005). Snowball sampling. Encyclopedia of biostatistics, 7. Doi: 10.1002/0470011815.b2a16070.
  20. Khazaei, B., Khatami, S., Alemohammad, S. H., Rashidi, L., Wu, C., Madani, K., & Aghakouchak, A. (2019). Climatic or regionally induced by humans? Tracing hydro-climatic and land-use changes to better understand the Lake Urmia tragedy. Journal of hydrology, 569, 203-217. Doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.12.004 .
  21. Kukkonen, A., Ylä‐Anttila, T., & Broadbent, J. (2017). Advocacy coalitions, beliefs and climate change policy in the United States. Public Administration, 95(3), 713-729.‏ Doi: 10.1111/padm.12321
  22. Li, W., & Wong, W. (2020). Advocacy coalitions, policy stability, and policy change in China: The case of birth control policy, 1980–2015. Policy Studies Journal, 48(3), 645-671.‏ Doi:10.1111/psj.12329.
  23. Nohrstedt, D., & Olofsson, K. (2016). A review of applications of the advocacy coalition framework in Swedish policy processes. European Policy Analysis, 2(2), 18-42, Doi:10.18278/epa.2.2.3.
  24. Parker, C., Scott, S., & Geddes, A. (2019). Snowball sampling. SAGE research methods foundations. Doi:dx.doi.org/10.4135/
  25. Ripberger, J. T., Gupta, K., Silva, C. L., & Jenkins‐Smith, H. C. (2014). Cultural theory and the measurement of deep core beliefs within the advocacy coalition framework. Policy Studies Journal, 42(4), 509-527. Doi:10.1111/psj.12074.
  26. Sabatier, P. A. (1988). An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy sciences, 21(2), 129-168.‏ Doi:10.1007/bf00136406
  27. Saemian, P., Elmi, O., Vishwakarma, B. D., Tourian, M. J., & Sneeuw, N. (2020). Analyzing the Lake Urmia restoration progress using ground-based and spaceborne observations. Science of The Total Environment, 739, 139857. Doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139857.
  28. Sattari, M. T., Mirabbasi, R., Jarhan, S., Shaker Sureh, F., & Ahmad, S. (2020). Trend and abrupt change analysis in water quality of Urmia Lake in comparison with changes in lake water level. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 192, 1-16. Doi:10.1007/s10661-020-08577-8
  29. Schulz, S., Darehshouri, S., Hassanzadeh, E., Tajrishy, M., & Schüth, C. (2020). Climate change or irrigated agriculture–what drives the water level decline of Lake Urmia. Scientific reports, 10(1), 1-10. Doi:10.1038/s41598-019-57150-y.
  30. Shahaei, B., DanaeiFard, H., Azar, A.(2016). Explaining Statis and Change in Iran,s Subsidy Policy: Advocacy Coalition Framework, Public Organizations Management, 5(1), 67-88(In Persian).
  31. Sotirov, M., & Memmler, M. (2012). The Advocacy Coalition Framework in natural resource policy studies—Recent experiences and further prospects. Forest policy and economics, 16, 51-64.‏ Doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2011.06.007
  32. Stensdal, I. (2014). Chinese climate-change policy, 1988-2013: moving on up. Asian Perspective, 111-135. Doi:1353/apr.2014.0004.
  33. Thissen, A.H., and Walker, W.E.(2013). Public Policy Analysis: New Developments. Springer.
  34. Waters, J. (2015). Snowball sampling: A cautionary tale involving a study of older drug users. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(4), 367-380. DOI:10.1080/13645579.2014.953316.
  35. Weible, C. M. (2008). Expert‐based information and policy subsystems: a review and synthesis. Policy Studies Journal, 36(4), 615-635. Doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00287.x
  36. Weible, C. M., & Sabatier, P. A. (2009). Coalitions, science, and belief change: Comparing adversarial and collaborative policy subsystems. Policy Studies Journal, 37(2), 195-212. Doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2009.00310.x.
  37. Weible, C. M., Sabatier, P. A., & McQueen, K. (2009). Themes and variations: Taking stock of the advocacy coalition framework. Policy studies journal, 37(1), 121-140.‏ Doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00299.x.
  38. Weible, C. M., Pattison, A., & Sabatier, P. A. (2010). Harnessing expert-based information for learning and the sustainable management of complex socio-ecological systems. Environmental science & policy, 13(6), 522-534. Doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2010.05.005.
  39. Weible, C. M., Ingold, K., Nohrstedt, D., Henry, A. D., & Jenkins‐Smith, H. C. (2019). Sharpening advocacy coalitions. Policy studies journal, 48(4), 1054-1081.‏ Doi:10.1111/psj.12360.
  40. Weible, C. M., & Workman, S. (2022). Methods of the Policy Process. Routledge, Doi:10.4324/9781003269083.
  41. Wiedemann, R., & Ingold, K. (2023). Building coalitions in a nascent subsystem: Investigating beliefs and policy preferences in Ugandan pesticide policy. Review of policy research. Doi:10.1111/psj.12360.
  42. Zoljoodi, M., & Didevarasl, A. (2014). Water-level fluctuations of Urmia Lake: relationship with the long-term changes of meteorological variables (solutions for water-crisis management in Urmia Lake Basin). Atmospheric and Climate Sciences, 358-368. Doi: 4236/acs.2014.43036
سیاستگذاری عمومی
دوره 9، شماره 4
اسفند 1402
صفحه 9-23

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار