الف) فارسی
1- دانایی‌فرد، حسن ؛ صادقی، محمدرضا و مصطفی‌زاده، معصومه .(1394). واکاوی و تحلیل تبعات سیاست‌زدگی بوروکراسی در نظام‌‌های سیاسی. فصلنامه اندیشه مدیریت راهبردی: پاییز و زمستان۱۳۹۴، دوره ۹، شماره۲؛ از صفحه 57 تا صفحه 86.
2- طهماسبی، رضا. (1390). درآمدی بر نظریه‌های مدیریت دولتی، تهران: انتشارات سمت.
3- Bach, T., & Veit, S. (2016, July). Pathways to the Top: the Consequences of Individual Career Patterns for Recruitment to High Public Office in Germany. In IPSA World Congress (Vol. 23, p. 28).
4- Bach, T., Hammerschmid, G., & Löffler, L. (2015, August). More delegation, more political control? Politicization of senior level appointments in 18 European countries. In EGPA annual conference in Toulouse.
5- Bersch, K., Praça, S., & Taylor, M. M. (2017). State capacity, bureaucratic politicization, and corruption in the Brazilian state. Governance, 30(1), 105-124.
6- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101.
7- Bryson, J., Sancino, A., Benington, J., & Sørensen, E. (2017). Towards a multi-actor theory of public value co-creation. Public Management Review, 19(5), 640-654.
8- Connaughton, B. (2017). Political-administrative relations: The role of political advisers. Administration, 65(2), 165-182.
9- Cooper, C. A. (2016). The politics of bureaucratic mobility: historical changes across public service bargains in Canada's provincial governments. Thesis for degree of Philosophy of Doctor (PhD) political Science, University of Montréal.
10- Dahlström, C., & Niklasson, B. (2013). The politics of politicization in Sweden. Public Administration, 91(4), 891-907.
11- Dahlström, C., Lapuente, V. and Teorell, J. (2010) Dimensions of Bureaucracy A Cross-National Dataset on the Structure and Behavior of Public Administration. QoG Working Paper Series, 13, pp.3–59.
12- Demir, T., & Nank, R. (2012). Interaction quality in political-administrative relations in the United States: Testing a multi-dimensional model. International Journal of Public Administration, 35(5), 329-339.
13- Demir, T., & Nyhan, R. C. (2008). The politics–administration dichotomy: An empirical search for correspondence between theory and practice. Public Administration Review, 68(1), 81-96.
14- Demir, T., & Reddick, C. G. (2012). Understanding Shared Roles in Policy and Administration: An Empirical Study of Council‐Manager Relations. Public Administration Review, 72(4), 526-535.
15- Demir, T., & Reddick, C. G. (2015). Political Orientation and Policy Involvement of City Managers: An Empirical Study of the Value-Activity Relationship. Public Organization Review, 15(4), 581-598.
16- Demir, T., Reddick, C. G., & Nank, R. (2015). The relationship between public service values and administrative involvement in policymaking. Public Organization Review, 15(1), 79-98.
17- Gherghina, S., & Kopecký, P. (2016). Politicization of administrative elites in Western Europe: an introduction.
18- Goodnow, F. (1900). Politics and Administration: a study in government. New York.
19- Hartlapp, M. (2016). Integrating across policy sectors: how the wider public impacts on the drafting process of EU trans-border healthcare. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 0020852316648225.
20- Hood, C. and Lodge, M. (2006) The Politics of Public Service Bargains: Reward. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21- Huber, J.D. and Lupia, A. (2001). Cabinet instability and delegation in parliamentary democracies. American Journal of Political Science 45(1): 18–32.
22- Hulst, R., Mafuru, W., & Mpenzi, D. (2015). Fifteen Years After Decentralization by Devolution: Political‐administrative Relations in Tanzanian Local Government. Public Administration and Development, 35(5), 360-371.
23- Jacobsen, D. I. (2006). The relationship between politics and administration: The importance of contingency factors, formal structure, demography, and time. Governance, 19(2), 303-323.
24- King, N., & Horrocks, C. (2010). Interviews in qualitative research. London: Sage.
25- Kopecký, P., Mair, P. and Spirova, M. (eds.). (2012) Party Patronage and party Government in European Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26- Krause, R. M., Feiock, R. C., & Hawkins, C. V. (2014). The administrative organization of sustainability within local government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(1), 113-127.
27- Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
28- Maykut, p., & Morehouse, R. (1994). Beginning qualitative research: A Philosophic and practical guide. London: The Falmer Press.
29- Meyer-Sahling, J.-H. (2008) The changing colours of the post-communist state: The politicisation of the senior civil service in Hungary. European Journal of Political Research 47(1): 1–33.
30- Moynihan, D. P., & Soss, J. (2014). Policy feedback and the politics of administration. Public Administration Review, 74(3), 320-332.
31- O'Dwyer, C. (2006). Runaway state-building: Patronage politics and democratic development. JHU Press.
32- Öhberg, P., MUNK CHRISTIANSEN, P. E. T. E. R., & Niklasson, B. (2017). Administrative politicization or contestability? How political advisers affect neutral competence in policy processes. Public Administration, 95(1), 269-285.
33- O'Leary, R. (2013). The ethics of dissent: Managing guerrilla government, 1st Edition Washington, DC: CQ Press.
34- Oliveros, V., & Schuster, C. (2016). Merit, Tenure, and Bureaucratic Behavior: Evidence From a Conjoint Experiment in the Dominican Republic. Comparative Political Studies, 0010414017710268.
35- Page, E., & Wright, V. (Eds.). (1999). Bureaucratic elites in Western European states. Oxford University Press.
36- Peters, G.B., and Pierre, J. (2004) Politicization of the Civil Service in Comparative Perspective. London: Routledge.
37- Petridou, E. (2014). Theories of the policy process: Contemporary scholarship and future directions. Policy studies journal, 42(S1).
38- Rahman, M. S. (2015). Politics-Bureaucracy Relations, Governance and Development in Bangladesh: The Case of Local Government (Doctoral dissertation).
39- Roman, A. V. (2017). The determinants of public administrators’ participation in policy formulation. The American Review of Public Administration, 47(1), 102-129.
40- Sarker, M. N. I., Bingxin, Y., Sultana, A., & Prodhan, A. Z. M. S. (2017). Problems and challenges of public administration in Bangladesh: pathway to sustainable development. International Journal of Public Administration and Policy Research, 2(1), 008-015.
41- Sowa, J. E., & Lu, J. (2017). Policy and management: Considering public management and its relationship to policy studies. Policy Studies Journal, 45(1), 74-100.
42- Svara, J. H. (1999). Complementarity of politics and administration as a legitimate alternative to the dichotomy model. Administration & society, 30(6), 676-705.
43- Svara, J. H. (2001). The myth of the dichotomy: Complementarity of politics and administration in the past and future of public administration. Public administration review, 61(2), 176-183.
44- Van Biezen, I. (2003). Political parties in new democracies: Party organization in Southern and East-Central Europe. Springer.
45- Van Biezen, I., & Kopecký, P. (2007). The state and the parties: public funding, public regulation and rent-seeking in contemporary democracies. Party politics, 13(2), 235-254.
46- Wilson, Woodrow. )1887(. The Study of Administration. Political Science Quarterly, 2(2): 197–222.
47- Zhang, Y., & Feiock, R. C. (2009). City managers’ policy leadership in council-manager cities. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(2), 461-476.
)