شناسایی و اولویت‌بندی حوزه‌ها و الزامات تنظیم‌گری چابک برای توسعه اقتصاد دیجیتال در ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری مهندسی فناوری اطلاعات، پژوهشکده مطالعات راهبردی و اقتصاد دیجیتال، پژوهشگاه ارتباطات و فناوری اطلاعات، تهران، ایران

2 دکتری مخابرات، پژوهشگاه ارتباطات و فناوری اطلاعات، تهران، ایران

3 دکتری کارآفرینی(کسب و کار)، پژوهشکده مطالعات راهبردی و اقتصاد دیجیتال، پژوهشگاه ارتباطات و فناوری اطلاعات، تهران، ایران

10.22059/jppolicy.2024.98674

چکیده

رویکرد تنظیم‌گری چابک با هدف تقویت یکپارچگی برای مدیریت ریسک‌ها و تضمین تحولات دیجیتالی فراگیر در زیست بوم اقتصاد دیجیتال مورد توجه کشورها بوده است. به این منظور، شناسایی حوزه‌ها و الزامات تنظیم‌گری چابک در مسیر توسعه اقتصاد دیجیتال، موضوعی ضروری است. در این پژوهش کیفی، هدف این است که حوزه‌ها و الزامات تنظیم‌گری چابک با تمرکز بر اسناد بالادستی مرتبط با توسعه اقتصاد دیجیتال تدوین گردد. در گام نخست پژوهش، فهرست اولیه‌ای از اسناد بالادستی شامل 40 سند، با استفاده از روش اسنادی تهیه شده و اسناد اثربخش شامل 16 سند با رویکرد گزینش نظری، انتخاب و محتوای این اسناد با استفاده از روش تحلیل مضمون، تحلیل شده و نهایتاً 14 حوزه و 26 الزام تنظیم‌گری چابک مطابق با اصول تنظیم‌گری چابک، با استفاده از روش AHP اولویت‌بندی شد. نتایج نشان می‌دهد که در لایه هسته؛ زیرساخت ارتباطی و اطلاعاتی، در لایه دیجیتال؛ خدمات دیجیتال دولت و در لایه دیجیتالی شده؛ داده و محتوا از اولویت بیشتری برخوردارند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

مراجع

  1. Authority F.C, (2015), Regulatory Sandbox. Financial Conduct Authority, fca.org.uk
  2. Bauer J. M., (2023). Agile Regulation: Experiments in Flexible Governance, https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748937463
  3. Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006), Using thematic analysis in psychology, Qualitative Research in Psychology, Vol. 3, No. 2, Pp. 77-101.
  4. Bukht, R., & Heeks, R. (2017). Defining, conceptualizing, and measuring the digital economy. Development Informatics working, paper (68), https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3431732
  5. Delegation of Ministers. (2021/12/29). Enactment on formation and determination of the composition of the special working group for the digital economy, Special Working Group on Digital Economy, Council of Ministers (Iran) [Persian]
  6. Delegation of ministers. (2022). Regulations for supporting digital economy platforms and businesses, Delegation of Ministers (Iran) [Persian]
  7. Delegation of ministers. (2022). Regulations for supporting freelancers active in the field of the digital economy, Regulation No. 160632/T60581K, Members of the special digital economy working group (Iran) [Persian]
  8. DeSeve E. , (2022), Agile Regulation Gateway to the Future: A New Framework, IBM Center for the Business of Government, businessofgovernment.org/blog/agile-regulation-gateway-future-new-framework
  9. Desjardins Dylan, (October 28, 2021), Unpacking the OECD Recommendation on Agile Regulatory Governance
  10. Doellgast, V. (2023). Strengthening social regulation in the digital economy: comparative findings from the ICT industry. Labour and Industry, 33(1), 22-38.
  11. Fast, V., Schnurr, D., & Wohlfarth, M. (2023). Regulation of data-driven market power in the digital economy: Business value creation and competitive advantages from big data. Journal of Information Technology, 38(2), 202-229.
  12. Frolov P and Lavrentyeva A.V. (2019). Regulatory Policy for Digital Economy: Holistic Institutional Framework. Montenegrin Journal of Economics. 15(4). 33-44.
  13. Holloway, I. & Todres, L. (2003), The Status of Method: Flexibility, Consistency and Coherence”, Qualitative Research, Vol. 3, No. 3, Pp. 345-357.
  14. Huawei, Little, A. D., (2020), Think Differently, Think differently. Think Archetype, Your Digital Economy Model: A Novel Approach to Digital Transformation and Policy Reform. https://www-file.huawei.com/-/media/corp2020/pdf/public-policy/adl_huawei_digital_transformation_main_report.pdf?la=en
  15. Islamic Council of Iran, (2023). The survey of Iran's 5-year Seventh Economic and Sociocultural Development Bill, Islamic Council of Iran (Iran) [Persian]
  16. Islamic Council of Iran. (2003). The Law of Duties and Powers of the Ministry of Communications and Information Technology, Islamic Council of Iran (Iran) [Persian]
  17. Islamic Council of Iran. (2007/09/09). The law amending the articles of the law of the fourth program of the economic, social, and cultural development of the I.R.I and the implementation of the general policies of the forty-fourth (44) article of the constitution, Islamic Council of Iran (Iran) [Persian]
  18. Islamic Council of Iran. (2018/06/12). I.R.I Law amending the law on the implementation of general policies, Article 44 (44) of the Constitution, Islamic Council of Iran (Iran) [Persian]
  19. Islamic Council of Iran. (2020). Plan to protect and protect personal data and information, Islamic Council of Iran (Iran) [Persian]
  20. Islamic Council of Iran. (2021). Design of the regulation system of virtual space services, Edited on 29/1, Joint Commission of the Islamic Council (Iran) [Persian]
  21. Jamshidi B., Emami, S.M., & BaniAsad, R. (2018), Designing the Conceptual Framework of Regulative Policies in Content Area of Cyberspace in Iran. Iranian Journal of Public Policy. 4(1), 96-122 [Persian]
  22. Jemilohun, B. O. (2019). Regulating Cyberspace: An Examination of Three Theories.
  23. Jenner, B., Flick, U., von Kardoff, E., & Steinke, I. (2004). A companion to qualitative research: Sage.
  24. Kaiser, C., Olszynski, M., (2021), Key Characteristics of Agile Regulations: Flexibility, https://institute.smartprosperity.ca/AgileRegulationsFlexibility
  25. Khan A. & Ximei, X., (2022), Digital Economy and Environmental Sustainability: Do Information Communication and Technology (ICT) and Economic Complexity Matter? Int J Environ Res Public Health journal, Doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912301
  26. Mason, S., & Seng, D., (2017). Electronic evidence. London: Institute of Advanced Legal Studies. doi:10.14296/517.9781911507079
  27. Mazinanian, S., (2021), A new approach to cyberspace regulation, MTLJ, 3. 297-319, Doi:10.22133/CLJ.2021.315328.1067
  28. Meyer A. De, and Loh C., (2004), “Impact of ICT on Government Innovation Policy: An International Comparison”, International Journal of Internet and Enterprise Management, 2(1), 1-29.
  29. Ministry of Communications and Information Technology. (2015). I.R.I Strategic document of the communication and information technology department in the country's sixth development plan, Ministry of Communications and Information Technology (Iran) [Persian]
  30. Ministry of Communications and Information Technology. (2021). Digital transformation development document, Ministry of Communications and Information Technology Recommendations (Iran) [Persian]
  31. Ministry of Communications and Information Technology. (2022). I.R.I Cloud computing development strategic document, Ministry of Communications and Information Technology Recommendations (Iran) [Persian]
  32. Nabiyi, F., Shamizanjani, M. & Mokhtarzadeh, N.G, (2023), Conceptualization of digital transformation strategy and identifying the principles and supporting capabilities for its formation with meta-synthesis approach, The Journal of Science and Technology Policy Letters (JSTPL)
  33. Narimani, M., Karimmian, Z., & Hosseini, S. J. (2020). An institutional framework for regulating new business models: A case study of application-based transportation. Iranian Journal of Public Policy, 6(1), 9-34.
  34. National Academy of Public Administration & PMI (2022). Agile Regulation: Gateway to the Future. PMI White Paper. Project Management Institute, N. A. P. A., https://www.pmi.org/business-solutions/white-papers/agile-regulation
  35. Nazif, T.H & Alipoor, M, (2022), The Legal Position and Effects of Self-regulation of Digital Platforms, MTLJ, 3(6), Doi:127-14110.22133/mtlj.2022.366647.1131
  36. Pinzaru, F. (2015). Managing in the digital economy: an introductive discussion. Pannon Management Review, 4(2), 9-31. https://pmr.uni-pannon.hu/articles/pmr_4_2.pdf#page=11
  37. Rakhmatovna, D. D. (2023). DIGITAL MARKET REGULATION. Science and Innovation, 2(7), 72-75.
  38. Supreme Council of Cyberspace, (2017). Resolution of the Supreme Council of Cyberspace on the subject of policies and measures to organize social messengers [Persian]
  39. Supreme Council of Cyberspace. (2016). Enactment of the 35th session - Clarifying the Requirements of the National Information Net, Supreme Council of Cyberspace (Iran) [Persian]
  40. Supreme Council of Cyberspace. (2020). Enactment of the 66th session - The Master Plan and Architecture of the National Information Net, Supreme Council of Cyberspace (Iran) [Persian]
  41. Supreme Council of Cyberspace. (2022). I.R.I Strategic document in Virtual Space, Enactment of the 84th session, Supreme Council of Cyberspace (Iran) [Persian]
  42. Sutherland, E. (2018). Trends in regulating the global digital economy. Available at SSRN 3216772.
  43. Tapscott, D. (2015). The Digital Economy: Anniversary Edition: rethink promise and peril in the age of networked intelligence. McGraw Hill Education.
  44. United Nations ECconomic Commission for Africa(UNECA/ECAS), (2019), "Digital Transformations and Economic Diversification in Central Africa: Issues, Challenges and Opportunities, United Nations, https://archive.uneca.org/sites/default/files/images/SROs/CA/ice_19_-_report_digital_economy_eng.pdf
  45. Vaska, S., Massaro M., Bagarotto E. M., & Mas F. D. (2020). The Digital Transformation of Business Model Innovation: A Structured Literature Review. https://doi.org/10.3389%2Ffpsyg.2020.539363
  46. (2020). Agile Regulation for the Fourth Industrial Revolution: A Toolkit for Regulators, World Economic Forum, weforum.org/docs/WEF_Agile_Regulation_for_the_Fourth_Industrial_Revolution_2020.pdf
  47. Welfens, P. J. (2007), “Digital Social Market Economy-Towards a New Economic System”, Digital Economic Dynamics Innovations, Networks and Regulations (pp. 25-61). Springer
سیاستگذاری عمومی
دوره 10، شماره 3
مهر 1403
صفحه 51-69

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار