مسأله‌محوری در سیاستگذاری جنایی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار حقوق جزا و جرم‌شناسی دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

2 دانشجوی دکتری حقوق جزا و جرم‌شناسی دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

چکیده

دولت‌ها برای حل گستره متنوعی از مسائل عمومی از سیاستگذاری جنایی استفاده می‌کنند. در صورتی که سیاستگذاری جنایی با شناخت کافی از مسأله انجام نشود و پیش از تحلیل مسأله، راهکار طراحی شود، نه تنها سیاست جنایی در حل مسأله محکوم به شکست است، بلکه هزینه‌های مادی و انسانی قابل توجهی در راستای حل یک مسأله کم اهمیت یا نامسأله هدر می‌رود. فارغ از مدل سیاست جنایی حاکم در کشورها می‌توان با استفاده از برخی شاخص‌ها، وضعیت کلی نظام سیاستگذاری جنایی را از حیث توجه به بایسته‌های مسأله‌محوری تحلیل نمود و با فهم نواقص نظام سیاستگذاری جنایی نسبت به اصلاح آن اقدام نمود. سیاستگذاری جنایی مسأله‌محور دارای بایسته‌های محتوایی و فرآیندی است. در مقاله حاضر با رویکرد توصیفی-تجویزی و  با استفاده از منابع کتابخانه‌ای به طراحی چهارچوب کلی تحلیل نظم سیاستگذاری جنایی پرداخته شده است. از منظر محتوایی، نوع شواهد به کارگرفته شده در سیاستگذاری جنایی بر اساس هرم سلسله مراتب شواهد و از نظر فرآیندی، رعایت اصل تفکیک میان مرحله تحلیل سیاستی و پیش‌نویس‌نگاری در چرخه سیاستگذاری جنایی، به عنوان مهم‌ترین بایسته‌های مسأله‌محوری در قالب چهارچوب کلی تحلیل نظام سیاستگذاری جنایی از منظر مسأله محوری ارائه شده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


  1. Ahmadi Movahed, Asghar, (2001), Elmination of Prosecuters’s Office {dadsara}; Causes and Consequenses, Legal Journal of Judiciary, Vol (65), Issue (36), 125-134. {In persian}
  2. Andrews, Matt, Lant Pritchett, and Michael Woolcock, (2020), Building state capability, Translated by: Jafar Kheirkhahan & Masoud Dorudi, second publish, Tehran, Iran, Rozaneh Publication. {In Persian}
  3. Ansari, Bagheri, (2020), Principles and Techniques for legislation, 1st pub, Tehran, Iran, Dadgostar publication.
  4. Irvanian, Amir, (2014), General Theory of Criminal Policy making, 1st pub, Terhan, Shahre Danesh Publication. {In Persian}
  5. Ashtarian, Kiomars, (2018), Guideline for policy making, first publish, 1St pub, Tehran, Bazargani Publication. {In Persian}
  6. Birkland, Thomas A., and Sarah E. DeYoung. (2012), "Focusing events and policy windows." In Routledge handbook of public policy, pp. 175-188. Routledge.
  7. Brereton, David. (2019), "Does criminology matter? Crime, politics and the policy process, New Horizons in Criminal Law, First publish, Tehran, Mizan Publication, 674- 686. {In Persian}
  8. Brooks, David, (2012), The social animal: The hidden sources of love, character, and achievement. Random House Trade Paperbacks.
  9. Cairney, Paul, (2012), "Complexity theory in political science and public policy." Political studies review 10, no. 3, 346-358
  10. Cairney, Paul, (2016), The politics of evidence-based policy making. Springer.
  11. Cairney, Paul, (2019), Understanding public policy: theories and issues. Vol. 2. Bloomsbury Publishing.
  12. Cairney, Paul, (2022), "The myth of ‘evidence-based policymaking’in a decentred state." Public Policy and Administration 37, no. 1, 46-66.
  13. Cairney, Paul, and Emily St Denny., (2020), Why isn't government policy more preventive?. Oxford University Press.
  14. Cairney, Paul, and Richard Kwiatkowski, (2017), "How to communicate effectively with policymakers: combine insights from psychology and policy studies." Palgrave Communications, no. 1, 1-8.
  15. Capano, Giliberto, (2012), "Policy dynamics and change: the never-ending puzzle." In Routledge handbook of public policy, pp. 469-479. Routledge.
  16. Cranston, Ross F, (1978), "Reform through legislation: the dimension of legislative technique." Nw. UL Rev. 73, 873.
  17. Deleon, Peter, (2015), The Historical Roots of the Field, Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, First publish, Tehran, 66- 89. {In Persian}
  18. (2020). What is an evidence hierarchy, https://www.facs.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/789163/What-is-an-Evidence-Hierarchy.pdf
  19. Freeman, Richard, (2015), Learning in Public Policy, Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, First publish, Tehran, 457- 484. {In Persian}
  20. Goodin, Robert E; Rein, Martin; Moran ,Michael, (2015), The Public and Its Politics, Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, First publish, Tehran, 20-65. {In Persian}
  21. Hahn, Robert W., and Patrick M. Dudley, (2003), "The disconnect between law and policy analysis: A case study of drivers and cell phones." Admin. L. Rev. 55, 127.
  22. Hertin, J., Turnpenny, J., Jordan, A., Nilsson, M., Russel, D., & Nykvist, B, (2009). Rationalising the policy mess? Ex ante policy assessment and the utilisation of knowledge in the policy process. Environment and Planning A, 41(5), 1185–1200.
  23. Howlett, Michael, and Sarah Giest, (2012), "The policy-making process." In Routledge handbook of public policy, pp. 17-28. Routledge.
  24. Ingram, Helen; Schneider Anne. L, (2015), Policy Analysis for Democracy, Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, First publish, Tehran, 219-244. {In Persian}
  25. Jones, Bryan D., and Herschel F. Thomas. "The cognitive underpinnings of policy process studies: Introduction to a special issue of Cognitive Systems Research." Cognitive Systems Research 45 (2017): 48-51.
  26. Lasswell, Harold Dwight. The decision process: Seven categories of functional analysis. Bureau of Governmental Research, College of Business and Public Administration, University of Maryland, 1956.
  27. Majone, Giandomenico, (2015), Agenda Setting, Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, First pub, Tehran, 291-318. {In Persian}
  28. Malekmohammadi, Hamidreza, (2020), Policies to Tackle Crime and Corruption, 2st pub, Tehran, Samt Publication. {In Persian}
  29. ---, ---, (2017), Basics and Principles of Public Policy Making, Second pub, Tehran, Samt Publication. {In Persian}
  30. Nafisi, Alireza; Ashaari, Mohsen, Tahmasbi, Saeed, (2021), Nudge for Iran, Second pub, Tehran, Milkan Publication. {In persian}
  31. Parsons, Wayne. (2021), An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis, Translated by: Hamidreza Malekmohammadi, Volume (1), Tehran, Strategic studies research center {Motaleat Rahbordi} publication. {In Persian}
  32. ------, -----. (2002) "From muddling through to muddling up-evidence based policy making and the modernisation of British Government." Public policy and administration 17, no. 3, 43-60.
  33. Poocharoen, Ora-orn, (2012), "Bureaucracy and the policy process." In Routledge Handbook of Public Policy, pp. 331-346. Routledge.
  34. Rein, Martin; (2015), Reframing Problematic Policies, Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, 1st pub, Tehran, 485-505. {In Persian}
  35. Roll, Michael, ed., (2014), The politics of public sector performance: Pockets of effectiveness in developing countries. Routledge.
  36. Sakiani, Zahra; Vaezi, Seyed Abbas, (2022), The Effect of Cognitive Biases on the Justice Quality in Criminal Court’s Judges Decision making, Legal Journal of Judiciary, Vol (86), Issue (119). 245- 269. {In Persian}
  37. Schneider, Anne, (2012), "Policy design and transfer." Routledge handbook of public policy, 235-246.
  38. Shafrits J.M., Borick, C.P, (2011), Introducing Public Policy, Translated by: Hamidreza Malekmohammadi, First pub, Tehran, Imam Sadegh (A.S) publication. {In persian}
  39. Shiri, Abass (2019), Restorative Justice, Tehran, Iran, Mizan. {In Persian}
  40. ---, ---, (2018), Criminal policy-making about Victims’ Rights, Iranian Journal of Public Policy, Vol (4), Issue (1), 161-175. {In Persian}
  41. ---, ---, (2018), Criminal policy-making; from internal control to external control, Iranian Journal of Public Policy, Vol (4), Issue (3), 103-121. {In Persian}
  42. Sadeghi, Azadeh, (2021), Feasibility Study of Implementing Legalization of Illegal Drugs in the Iranian Criminal Justice System with Comparative Approach, Comparative Law Studies, Vol (12), Issue (2), 567- 589. {In Persian}
  43. Stout, Brian, Brian Williams, and Joe Yates, (2015), Applied Criminology, Translated by: Hamidreza Malek Mohammadi, First pub, Tehran, Mizan publication. {In Persian}
  44. Welsh, Wayne N., and Philip W. Harris. Criminal justice policy and planning: Planned change. Routledge, 2016.
  45. Xanthaki, Helen, (2021), Drafting Legislation, Arts and Technology of Rules, First pub, Tehran, Samt publication and The Islamic Consultative Assembly’s Center for research and Development in Humanities. {In Persian}
  46. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploas/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/62668/WWPC_6_Dec_2011.pdf, accessed date: 7/10/2022.
  47. https://www.isna.ir/news/96101507586, accessed date: 2/2/2023.
  48. https://libguides.winona.edu/ebptoolkit/Levels-Evidence, accessed date: 12/12/2022.