Designing a Policy Impact Assessment Model for Higher Education in Iran

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Phd Student, Education Administration, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Associate Professor, Educational Administration,, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran

3 Associate Professor, Educational Administration, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran.

4 Associate Professor, Educational Administration, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran

5 Associate professor of political science, ,Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: One of the areas of policy-making that, like other areas of policy-making, requires efforts to adopt a policy based on evidence and science, is policy-making in the field of higher education. The purpose of this research is to present a model of policy impact assessment in Iran's higher education.
Research method: Grounded theory method is used in this article. In this research, the theoretical foundations and existing backgrounds in internal and external dimensions were examined through in-depth study. The statistical population of the research was selected from the policy makers of the higher education system, experts, managers and officials in the field of higher education and experts in the field of policy making in higher education. In this section, until theoretical saturation was reached, chain or snowball type targeted sampling was used. In this way, 12 interviews were conducted.
Findings: The findings of the research showed that based on the findings of the research, goal setting, research and education as causal conditions through the final effect of policy in higher education on the strategic categories of competitive advantage, formulation and implementation of policy, quality of policy and practice, resource management , communication and coordination, strategy, transparency and accountability and effective models, and taking into account the environmental and interventionist categories, it leads to the consequences of speed of action, performance of development and growth, effectiveness, change and transformation and social impact.
Conclusion: Paying attention to the effect of politics in higher education helps policy makers and administrators in the implementation of policies. Reviewing the policies and redesigning the country's higher education programs is in line with the rapid changes and developments of science and technology and is one of the proposals that can solve the aforementioned challenges, solve the relevant crises, existing requirements and adopt new initiatives. Higher education should be included in the order of reviewing the country's governance and policy-making system.

Keywords


  1. Aalipour, Alireza, Enayati, Taraneh (2016), Commercialization Research of Fourth Generation University, Scientific Research Quarterly of Interdisciplinary Studies of Strategic Knowledge, 7 (26): 53-76. [in Persian]
  2. Abelson, S. (2022). Mental Health Equity in Higher Education: The Role of Policy, Policing, and Visible Inclusion (Doctoral dissertation).
  3. Adusei-Asante, K. (2017). Towards developing policy impact assessment framework: An introduction. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference of the International Association for Impact Assessment. IAIA.
  4. Bastedo, M. N., Altbach, P. G., & Gumport, P. J. (Eds.). (2023). American higher education in the twenty-first century: Social, political, and economic challenges. JHU Press.
  5. Blomquist, J. (2003). Impact evaluation of social programs: A policy perspective.
  6. Børte, K., Nesje, K., & Lillejord, S. (2023). Barriers to student active learning in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(3), 597-615.
  7. Esteves, A. M., Franks, D., & Vanclay, F. (2012). Social impact assessment: the state of the art. Impact assessment and project appraisal, 30(1), 34-42.
  8. Fadhil, I., & Sabic-El-Rayess, A. (2021). Providing equity of access to higher education in Indonesia: A policy evaluation. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), 3(1), 57-75.
  9. Findler, F., Schönherr, N., Lozano, R., & Stacherl, B. (2019). Assessing the impacts of higher education institutions on sustainable development—an analysis of tools and indicators. Sustainability, 11(1), 59.
  10. Fischer, T. B. (2023). Strategic environmental assessment in transport and land use planning. Taylor & Francis.
  11. Glasson, J., & Therivel, R. (2019). Introduction to environmental impact assessment. Routledge.
  12. Harasim, L. (2017). Learning theory and online technologies. Routledge.
  13. Hassanzadeh, Baranikord, Sudabah, Moqarzadeh, Fatemeh. (2015). Policymaking of higher education: Emphasis on the cultural dimension or the economic dimension. National Congress of Ali Education of Iran, Tehran. [in Persian]
  14. Hundley, S. P., & Kahn, S. (Eds.). (2023). Trends in assessment: Ideas, opportunities, and issues for higher education. Taylor & Francis.
  15. Jacob, K., Guske, A. L., & von Prittwitz, V. (2011). Die Berücksichtigung von Nachhaltigkeitsaspekten in der Politikfolgenabschätzung im internationalen Vergleich: Innovationen und Trends.‏
  16. Javadani, Hamid. (2014). Designing a policy research model in Iran's higher education system. Research and Planning in Higher Education, 21(2), 81-104. [in Persian]
  17. Levac, L., Stinson, J., Manning, S. M., & Stienstra, D. (2021). Expanding evidence and expertise in impact assessment: informing Canadian public policy with the knowledges of invisible communities. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 39(3), 218-228.
  18. Mahdavi, Abulqasem (2019). Investigating the effectiveness of Iran's higher education in achieving sustainable development. Economic research (sustainable growth and development). 1399; 20 (4): 1-32. [in Persian]
  19. Mayer, I. S., Van Daalen, C. E., & Bots, P. W. (2004). Perspectives on policy analyses: a framework for understanding and design. International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management, 4(2), 169-191.
  20. McCord, A., Heinemann, E., & Phillips, L. (2018). IFAD RESEARCH SERIES 26-Exploration of a Methodology for Assessing the Impact of Policy Engagement: What Impact and How to Assess It. Exploration of a Methodology for Assessing the Impact of Policy Engagement: What Impact and How to Assess It.
  21. Molla, T., & Cuthbert, D. (2023). Crisis and policy imaginaries: higher education reform during a pandemic. Higher Education, 86(1), 45-63.
  22. Neves, J., & Hillman, N. (2019). Student academic experience survey 2019, advance HE and higher education policy Institute.
  23. Nieto, Y., Gacía-Díaz, V., Montenegro, C., González, C. C., & Crespo, R. G. (2019). Usage of machine learning for strategic decision making at higher educational institutions. IEEE Access, 7, 75007-75017.
  24. Oztel, H. (2020). Fourth generation university: co-creating a sustainable future.
  25. Perna, L. W. (Ed.). (2023). Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research: Volume 38.
  26. Podhora, A., Helming, K., Adenäuer, L., Heckelei, T., Kautto, P., Reidsma, P., ... & Jansen, J. (2013). The policy-relevancy of impact assessment tools: Evaluating nine years of
  27. Rosser, A. (2023). Higher education in Indonesia: The political economy of institution-level governance. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 53(1), 53-78.
  28. Ruben, B. D. (2023). Excellence in higher education Guide: a framework for the design, assessment, and continuing improvement of institutions, departments, and programs. Taylor & Francis.
  29. Scott, P. (2018). Policy process in higher education. Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions. Springer, Dordrecht. Doi: https://doi. org/10.1007/978-94-017-9553-1_151-1.
  30. Yang, L., Hu, Y., & Wei, X. (2023). Assessment of the environmental effects of China's fertility policy: The impact from increasing numbers of children in households. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 99, 107006.
  31. Zhang, B., Velmayil, V., & Sivakumar, V. (2023). A deep learning model for innovative evaluation of ideological and political learning. Progress in Artificial Intelligence, 12(2), 119-131.
  32. Wollmann, H. (2017). Policy evaluation and evaluation research. In Handbook of public policy analysis (pp. 419-428). Routledge.