The Prioritizing the key issues in the regulation of the relationship between the public sector and NGOs in the field of charities

Authors

1 Graduated Ph.D. Marketing Management at Islamic Azad University of Central Tehran Branch

2 Ph.D. Student of Islamic teachings and public administration of Imam Sadiq University

Abstract

One of the most important elements of good governance is the increasing public participation in community affairs. Aid to poor people and charitable activities are one of the most important areas that individuals must be activated in it. This is so important that It can be argued the solving of poverty is not possible without public participation. On the other hand, the government cannot be apathetic to their responsibility in preparation and facilitating Charities activities. The lack of regulation of the relationship between the public sector and the nonprofit sector in charities causes is one of the problems of the nation. The Achievement to the desired pattern to set this relationship, in the first step we need to identify the damages in this subject. In the first study, we conduct some interviews with a number of managers of Imam Khomeini Relief Foundation and authorities of charities. After that we use thematic analysis to identify the main damage in the regulation of the relationship. The damage included 31 issues were classified in 6 main categories. Then, with using Analytical Hierarchy Process the issues are prioritized. Finally, the problem of monitoring and evaluating the performance of charities and charge of the government in the subject of poverty elimination were identified as the most important macro issues in this area.

Keywords

References

1- حقیقی، محمد رضا (1388) «جایگاه و ماهیت حقوقی سازمان های غیردولتی با تأکید بر نظام حقوقی ایران» مجله تحقیقات حقوقی، شماره 49، صص 387 تا 420.
2- دهستانی اسفندآبادی، حسین(1386) «همکاری دولت و سازمان های مردم نهاد در توسعه» مجله برنامه، شماره 218، صص 18 تا 21.
3- زارعی، محمد حسین(1383) «حکمرانی خوب، حاکمیت و حکومت در ایران» مجله تحقیقات حقوقی، شماره 40، صص 155 تا 202.
4- سامتی، مرتضی؛ رنجبر، همایون ومحسنی، فضیلت(1390) «تحلیل تأثیر شاخص های حکمرانی خوب بر شاخص توسعه انسانی، مطالعه موردی: کشورهای جنوب شرقی آسیا» مجله پژوهش های رشد و توسعه اقتصادی، شماره 4، صص183 تا 223.
5- سعید، پدرام(1381) «بخش چهارم: سازمان های غیردولتی: توفیق و ناکامی سازمان های غیردولتی در تکوین مردم سالاری» مجله مجلس و راهبرد، شماره 36، صص 329 تا 340.
6- عابدی جعفری، حسن و همکاران(1390) «تحلیل مضمون و شبکه مضامین: روشی ساده و کارآمد برای تبیین الگوهای موجود در داده­های کیفی» دوفصلنامه اندیشه مدیریت راهبردی، سال 5، شماره 2، صص151-198.
7- عبادی، صادق(1378) «بنیادها و مؤسسات خیریه غیر وقفی در ایران (نقد و ارزیابی)» مجله وقف میراث جاویدان، شماره 27، صص 24 تا 33.
8- علیزاده ثانی، محسن و الوانی، سید مهدی (1386) «تحلیلی بر کیفیت حکمرانی خوب در ایران» مجله مطالعات مدیریت بهبود و تحول، شماره 53، صص 1 تا 24.
9- کلینى، محمد بن یعقوب‏(1407 ه ق) الکافی، چاپ چهارم،‏ تهران: دار الکتب الإسلامیة.
10- مومنی، منصور(1391) مباحث نوین تحقیق در عملیات. چاپ چهارم، تهران: نشر مولف.
11- ناظمی اردکانی، محمد (1387) «حکمرانی خوب با رویکرد اسلامی» مجله مصباح، شماره 76، صص 107 تا 128.
12- Anheier helmut k. (2005) nonprofit organizations theory management policy, Routledge.
13- Ayres-Williams, R. (1998) “Changing the face of nonprofits,” Black Enterprise 28(10):pp 110–14.
14- Baldwin Robert, Martin Cave, Martin Lodge, (2012), Understanding Regulation: Theory, Strategy, and Practice, OUP Oxford, Business & Economics Accounting regulation for charities: international responses to IFRS adoption
15- Boyatzis, Richard E. (1998) Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis & code development. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication.
16- Braun, Virginia, Clarke, Victoria, Using thematic analysis in Psychology, (2006), Qualitative Research in Psychology, Vol.3, No.2, pp77-101
17- Koop, Christel, and Martin Lodge (2015) "What is regulation? An interdisciplinary concept analysis." Regulation & Governance.
18- Lipsky, M. and Smith, S. R. (1990) “Nonprofit Organizations, Government, and the Welfare State,” Political Science Quarterly 104(4): pp 625-48.
19- Ryan, Grey W. & Bernard, H. Russell, (2003) “Techniques to Identify Theme”, Field Method, Vol. 15, No.1, pp85-109.
20- Ryan, W. P. (1999) “The New Landscape for Nonprofits,” Harvard Business Review 77(1), pp127-36.
21- Salamon, L. M. and Anheier, H. K. (1995) Partners in Public Service: Government–Nonprofit Relations in the Modern Welfare State, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
22- Salamon, L. M. and Anheier, H. K. (1999) “Civil Society in Comparative Perspective,” in L. M. Salamon, H. K. Anheier, R. List, S. Toepler, and S. W. Sokolowski, and Associations (eds.) Global Civil Society: Dimensions of the Nonprofit Sector, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Center for Civil Society Studies.
23- Selznick P (1985) Focusing Organizational Research on Regulation. In: Noll R (Ed) Regulatory Policy and the Social Sciences, pp 363–367. University of California Press, Berkeley
24- Smith, S. R. and Lipsky, M. (1993) Nonprofits for Hire: The Welfare State in the Age of Contracting, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25- Weisbrod, B. A. (1998) “The Nonprofit Mission and Its Financing: Growing Links between Nonprofits and the Rest of the Economy,” in B. A. Weisbrod (ed.) To Profit or Not to Profit: The Commercial Transformation of the Nonprofit Sector, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Iranian Journal of Public Policy
Volume 4, Issue 3
December 2018
Pages 141-158

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics