Designing a typology as a policy for developing entrepreneurship knowledge

Document Type : Original Article



Governments should encourage and promote policies on how to be entrepreneurs and ntrepreneurship, there are knowledge gaps. On the one hand the need to develop policies to stimulate entrepreneurship, to achieve a common understanding and consensus about the meaning ofentrepreneurship. The need for policies to promote entrepreneurship science entrepreneurship in education, research, and is promoted was in operation. As mentioned this in turn creates a barrier for backup policies to stimulate entrepreneurship in the communities.


الف- فارسی
1- الوانی، سید مهدی، بودلایی، حسن،(1389)، پدیدارشناسی در مطالعات کارآفرینی، فصلنامه علوم مدیریت ایران، شماره 19، ص ص 33-63.
2- اعرابی، سید محمد،(1389)، جزوه مبانی فلسفی تئوری‌های سازمان و مدیریت. دوره دکتری.
3- دانایی فرد، حسن(1388)، " روش شناسی تدوین خطمشی ملی کارآفرینی کشور" ، چارچوب مفهومی، توسعه کارآفرینی. سال دوم، شماره ششم، زمستان 1388. از ص 125-155.
4- داوری، علی و رضایی، حمیدرضا،(1385)،"  نقش دولت و خطمشی های دولتی در توسعه کارآفرینی" ، فصلنامه علوم مدیریت ایران، دوره اول، شماره 2، ص 109-129.
5- شین، اسکات،(1388)، تئوری عمومی کارآفرینی، ترجمه کامبیز طالبی و همکاران، تهران، نشر تهران
ب- خارجی
6- Davidsson,P.& wiklund,J.(2001),’Levels of analysis in Entrepreneurship research: current research Practice and suggestions for the future’. Entrepreneurship theory and Practice, 26(4),81-99.
7- Davidsson, Per.,(2004), ‘researching Enterpreneurship’,  springer+ Science Business media Inc.
8- Davidsson, per, (2008), ‘the Entrepreneurship Research challenge’, Edward Elgar.
9- Gartner, W.B. (2001), “Is there an elephant in entrepreneurship? Blind assumptions in theory development”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 25 No. 4, pp. 27-39.
10- Gedeon, Steve, (2010), ²what is Entrepreneurship?² Entrepreneurial review, vol, 1. Issue, 3.pp.16-35.
11- Hart, D,M.(2003). “Entrepreneurship policy: what it is and where it came from”. In D.m.Hart (Ed), the Emergence of Entrepreneurship policy Cambridge : Cambridge university press.
12- Holtz- Eakin & Harvey, s.Rosen, (2004), ‘Publie Poiey and the Economics of Entre Preneurship’, Massachusetts Institue of Technology Publications.
13- Huse,M.(2000).’Boards of directors in SMEs: a review and research agenda’, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 12,271-290.
14- Ireland,R.D,Reutzed,C.R,Webb,J.W.&Texas,cs.(2005)."Entrepreneurship research in AMJ: what has been Published, what might the future hold", Academy of management Journal,
15- landstrom,H.(1999). ‘the roots of Entrepreneurship research’. The new England Journal of Entrepreneurship,2,9-20.
16- Low, M.B. (2001), “The adolescence of entrepreneurship research: specification of purpose”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 25 No. 4, pp. 17-25.
17- Parker, c,s.,(2005), ‘ the economics of entrepreneurship ’,now publishers inc.
18- Shane, s. & venkataraman, s. (2000), ‘the Promise of entrepreneurship as a field of Research’,  Academy  of management review, 25. 217- 226.
19- shane,s. (ed 2002). ‘The foundation of entrepreneurship’, Edward publishing.
20- Stevenson, H. and Harmeling, S. (1990), “Entrepreneurship’s need for a more chaotic theory”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 1-14.
21- Thornton, P. (1999), “The sociology of entrepreneurship”, Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 25, pp. 19-46.
22- Yusuf, Juita-Elena, (2005), ²Putting Entrepreneurship in lt’s rightful place: A typology For Defining Entrepreneurship A cross Private, Public and nonprofit sectors², Academy of entrepreneurship Journal, volume, 11, 113, 127.
23- Zahra, shaker, ‘Entrepreneurship and Disciplinary scholarships: Return to the foun tainhead’, in : Alvarez, sharon A, Agrawal, Rajshree ;Sorenson, olav; (2005), ‘Hand Book of Entrepreneurship research; Disciplinary Perspectives’, Boston, MA:Springer.