Identity-Policy Linkage: A Theoretical and Practical Framework for Targeted Government Intervention

Document Type : Review Article

Authors

1 Professor of Public administration, Faculty of Management and Economics, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

2 Ph.d. of Public Administration, Faculty of Management and Economics, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

3 Assistant Professor of Public Administration, Research Institute for Islamic Culture and Thought, Tehran, Iran

4 Assistant Professor of Public Administration, Faculty of Management and Economics, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

10.22059/jppolicy.2026.107871

Abstract

Identity-based policymaking, by challenging the fundamental assumption of the “homogeneous citizen” in the design of public policies, emphasizes the determining role of the latent identity heterogeneity of stakeholders. This article argues, by proposing the central concept of “identity-instrument fit,” that the congruence of the motivational logic of different identities with the logic of the effectiveness of policy instruments is a necessary condition for achieving behavioral effectiveness and strengthening the symbolic legitimacy of policies. By using a mixed methodology (latent class analysis and alignment matrix) and examining practical examples in the areas of housing, transportation, and agriculture, it is shown that designing combined and targeted packages of t instruments, appropriate to the identified identity profiles, while increasing efficiency and achieving distributive justice, reduces risks such as identity essentialism and social polarization. This framework offers a fundamental rethinking of the understanding of target groups and the symbolic function of policies.

Keywords

References

  1. Akerlof, G. A., & Kranton, R. E. (2000). Economics and identity. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3), 715–753.
  2. Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39.
  3. Bamberg, S., Rees, J., & Seebauer, S. (2015). Collective climate action: Determinants of participation intention in community-based pro-environmental initiatives. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 155–165.
  4. Behavioral Insights Team. (2014). EAST: Four simple ways to apply behavioural insights. Cabinet Office.
  5. Béland, D. (2017). Identity, politics, and public policy. Critical Policy Studies, 11(1), 1–18.
  6. Bénabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2011). Identity, morals, and taboos: Beliefs as assets. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(2), 805–855.
  7. Bicchieri, C. (2006). The grammar of society: The nature and dynamics of social norms. Cambridge University Press.
  8. Borwein, S., & Lucas, J. (2021). Municipal identity and city interests. Political Behavior, 45, 877–896.
  9. Brown, N. E., Clark, C. J., Mahoney, A. M., Siow, O., & Strawbridge, M. G. (2024). Intersectional identity and representative politics. Politics & Gender, 20(3), 727–733.
  10. Cassan, G. (2015). Identity-based policies and identity manipulation: Evidence from colonial Punjab. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 7(4), 103–131.
  11. Clayton, S. (2003). Environmental identity: A conceptual and an operational definition. In S. Clayton & S. Opotow (Eds.), Identity and the natural environment: The psychological significance of nature (pp. 45–65). MIT Press.
  12. Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), Article 8.
  13. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.
  14. Fraser, N. (1995). From redistribution to recognition? Dilemmas of justice in a ‘post-socialist’ age. New Left Review, 212, 68–93.
  15. , H.-L. (2023). Integrating identity in policy design theory. Policy & Politics, 51(1), 2–19.
  16. Halpern, D. (2015). Inside the nudge unit: How small changes can make a big difference. Ebury Publishing.
  17. Hancock, A.-M. (2007). When multiplication doesn’t equal quick addition: Examining intersectionality as a research paradigm. Perspectives on Politics, 5(1), 63–79.
  18. Head, B. W. (2016). Toward more "evidence-informed" policy making? Public Administration Review, 76(3), 472–484.
  19. Heinen, E. (2016). Identity and travel behaviour: A cross-sectional study on commute mode choice and intention to change. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 43, 238–253.
  20. Hood, C. C., & Margetts, H. Z. (2007). The tools of government in the digital age. Palgrave Macmillan.
  21. Hornung, J., Bandelow, N. C., & Vogeler, C. S. (2019). Social identities in the policy process. Policy Sciences, 52(2), 211–231.
  22. Hornung, J., Bandelow, N. C., & Olvermann, M. (2025). Latent target groups—A methodological contribution of social identities to policy design research. Policy Studies Journal. Advance online publication.
  23. Howlett, M. (2011). Designing public policies: Principles and instruments. Routledge.
  24. John, P. (2018). How far to nudge?: Assessing behavioural public policy. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  25. Kymlicka, W. (1995). Multicultural citizenship: A liberal theory of minority rights. Oxford University Press.
  26. Mason, L. (2018). Ideologues without issues: The polarizing consequences of ideological identities. Public Opinion Quarterly, 82(2), 280–301.
  27. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.
  28. Pande, R. (2025). "Identity politics" is economic policy. Science, 387(6731), 260–261.
  29. Pedersen, A. B., Nielsen, H. Ø., & Daugbjerg, C. (2020). Environmental policy mixes and target group heterogeneity: Analysing Danish farmers' responses to the pesticide taxes. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 22(5), 608–619.
  30. Peters, B. G. (2018). Policy problems and policy design. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  31. Salamon, L. M. (Ed.). (2002). The tools of government: A guide to the new governance. Oxford University Press.
  32. Schneider, A. L., & Ingram, H. M. (1993). Social construction of target populations: Implications for politics and policy. American Political Science Review, 87(2), 334–347.
  33. Schneider, A. L., & Ingram, H. M. (1997). Policy design for democracy. University Press of Kansas.
  34. Sen, A. (2006). Identity and violence: The illusion of destiny. W.W. Norton & Company.
  35. Sunstein, C. R. (2016). The ethics of influence: Government in the age of behavioral science. Cambridge University Press.
  36. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole.
  37. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Nelson-Hall.
  38. Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press.
  39. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2022). Uncertain times, unsettled lives: Shaping our future in a transforming world. Human Development Report 2021-22. UNDP.
  40. Weller, B. E., Bowen, N. K., & Faubert, S. J. (2020). Latent class analysis: A guide to best practice. Journal of Black Psychology, 46(4), 287–311.
  41. World Bank. (2013). Inclusion matters: The foundation for shared prosperity. The World Bank.
  42. Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton University Press.
Iranian Journal of Public Policy
Volume 12, Issue 2
June 2026
Pages 414-426

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics