Wicked Problems in Public Policy: Origins, Concepts and Critiques

Document Type : Review Article

Author

Phd of Public Policy, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, College of Farabi, Qom, Iran

Abstract

In recent years, the concept of wicked problems (in contrast to tame problems) is under scrutiny in different disciplines. However, it is usually applied with no attention to its characteristics, fundamental definitions and functions. Its vast use for different kinds of problems fragments views in definition and identification of this sort of problems. In this article origins and roots of wicked problems are identified first. A change in public problems stream, crisis in scope of science, government and economy and encountering these events creates the notion of wicked problems. Although someone out of the policymaking discipline introduced them, they existed in the realm of policy and were dealt with. Wicked-tame dichotomy rationale criticized and a spectrum of wickedness degree of problems is accepted among scholars. Wicked-tame Taxonomy of problems according to creators of this notion, resembles to existing problem taxonomy in public policy which divide problems to ill structured or well-structured ones.  Nevertheless, different and various combination of complexity, uncertainty, amount of players and actors, tools and instruments can represent different kind of wicked problems. Meanwhile concept of wicked problems and its plausible functions receives serious criticisms, such as insufficient definition, wrong application, ignorance of reflexivity and inability to trickle down to public policy main stream.  

Keywords


  1. Alford, J. & Head, B. W. (2017). Wicked and less wicked problems: a typology and a contingency framework. policy and society, 36(3), 397-413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2017.1361634
  2. Australian Public Service Commission (APSC). (2007). Tackling wicked problems: A public policy perspective (Discussion Paper). Canberra: APSC. https://leg acy.apsc.gov.au/tackling-wicked-problems-public-policy-perspective
  3. Bashirie, H. (2007). History of political thoughts: Marxist schools.[In Persian]. Ney publication.
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1994). Raisons pratiques: sur la theorie de l'action. [In Persian].Translated by Mardiha, M.
  5. Churchman, C. W. (1967). Guest editorial: wicked problems. Manage Sci. 14(4, Application Series), B141–B142.
  6. Danaeifard, H. (2016). New developments in public policy making. [In Persian]. Imam Sadegh university press.
  7. Danken, T., Dribbisch, K., & Lange, A. (2016). Studying Wicked Problems Forty Years On: Towards a Synthesis of a Fragmented Debate. Der moderne staat - dms: Zeitschrift für Public Policy, Recht und Management, 9(1), 15-33. https://doi.org/10.3224/dms.v9i1.23638
  8. Dunn, W. (2018). Public policy analysis.
  9. Grint, K. (2005). Problems, Problems, Problems: The Social Construction of ‘Leadership. Human Relations Volume, 58(11), 1467–1494. DOI: 10.1177/0018726705061314
  10. Head, B.W. (2008). wicked problems in public policy. Public policy, 3(2), 101-118
  11. Head, B. W. (2019). Forty years of wicked problems literature: forging closer links to policy studies. Policy and society, 38(2), 180–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2018.1488797
  12. Head, B. W. (2022). Wicked problems in public policy, understanding and responding to complex challenges. Palgrave Macmillan.
  13. Head, B. & Alford, J. (2015). Wicked Problems: Implications for Public Policy and Management. Administration & Society, 47(6), 711–739. https://doi.org/1177/0095399713481601
  14. Hoornbeek, J. A. & Peters, G. (2017). Understanding policy problems: a refinement of past ork. Policy and society, 36(3), 365–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2017.1361631
  15. Howlett, M & Ramesh, M (1995). Studying public policy. Policy cycles and policy subsystems. [In Persian]. Translated by Monavarian, A. & Golshan, E. Public Administration Training Center
  16. Lönngren, J. & Van Poeck, K. (2021). Wicked problems: a mapping review of the literature. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 28(6), 481-502. DOI: 10.1080/13504509.2020.1859415
  17. Markowska, J., Szalinska, W., Dabrowska, J. and Brzakala, M. (2020). The concept of a participatory approach to water management on a reservoir in response to wicked problems. Journal of Environmental Management, 259, 1-14.  DOI: 1016/j.jenvman.2019.109626
  18. Morgan, G. & Burrell, G. (1979). ‎Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis: elements of the sociology of corporate life. [In Persian]. Imam Khomeini institute
  19. Nair, S. & Howlett, M. (2017). The central conundrums of policy formulation: ill-structured problems and uncertainty in Handbook of policy
  20. Noordegraaf, M., Douglas, S., Geuijen, K. & Van Der Steen, M. (2019). Weaknesses of wickedness: a critical perspective on wickedness theory. Policy and Society, 38(2), 278-297. DOI: 10.1080/14494035.2019.1617970
  21. Parsons, D. W. (1995). Public policy: an introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis. Translated by Malekmohammady, H. [In Persian].
  22. Peters, G. (2021). Advanced Introduction to public policy. Edward Elgar
  23. Peters, G. & Fontaine, G. (2022). Research Handbook of Policy Design. Edward Elgar
  24. Pritchett, W. E. (2008). Which Urban Crisis? Regionalism, Race, and Urban Policy. journal of urban history. 34(2), 1960-1974. https://doi.org/10.1177/0096144207308678
  25. Razavi, F., Heydari, H., Rahimi, R. (2017). An inquiry on philosophical paradigms change in knowledge management. [In Persian]. Journal of human resource studies, 24, 189-220.
  26. Rittel, H.W.J. & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences,4, 155–169.
  27. Ruhl, J. & Salzman, J. (2020). Introduction: Governing wicked problems. Vanderbilt Law Review, 73(6), 1561-1583
  28. Sarrafi, M. (2000). The fundamentals of regional development planning. [In Persian]. Plan and Budget organization press.
  29. Selg, P., Sootla, G. &  Klasche, B. (2023). Relational Approach to Governing Wicked Problems From Governance Failure to Failure Governance. Palgrave Macmillan
  30. Shafritz, J. M. & Borick, C. P. (2008). Introducing public policy. Translated by Malekmohammady, H. [In Persian]. Imam Sadegh university press.
  31. Skaburskis, A. (2008). The Origin of “Wicked Problems”. Planning Theory & Practice, 9(2), 277–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350802041654
  32. Simon, H. A. (1973). The structure of ill structured problems. Artificial Intelligence, 4(3-4), 181-201.
  33. Termeer, C., Dewulf, A. & Biesbroek, R. (2019). A critical assessment of the wicked problem concept: relevance and usefulness for policy science and practice. Policy and Society, 38(2), 167-179, DOI: 10.1080/14494035.2019.1617971
  34. Torgerson, D. (2007). Promoting the Policy Orientation: Lasswell in Context. In Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics, and Methods. Edited by Fischer et.al. CRC press
  35. Turnbull, N. & Hoppe, R. (2019). Problematizing ‘wickedness’: a critique of the wicked problems concept, from philosophy to practice. Policy and Society, 38(2), 315–337 https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2018.1488796
  36. Wallerstein, I. (1997). Geopolitics and geoculture: essays on the changing worldsystem Translated by Izadi, P. [In Persian]. Ney publication
  37. Warde, A. & Savage, M. (1993). Urban sociology, capitalism, and modernity. Translated by Purreza, A. [In Persian]. SAMT press.
  38. Waters, M. (2001). Globalization. Translated by Mardani, E. & Moridy, S. [In Persian]. IMI Publication.
  39. Xiang, W. (2013). Working with wicked problems in socio-ecological systems: Awareness, acceptance and adaptation. Landscape and urban planning, 110, 1-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.11.006
  40. Xiaojing, H., Ruichang, L. & Zhiping, S. (2022). A Bibliometric Analysis of Wicked Problems: From Single Discipline to Transdisciplinarity. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 15, 299–329 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-022-00346-w