Governance Challenges in the Strategic Policy of the Middle East

Document Type : Research Article

Author

Distinguished Professor of Political Science, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

The rules of governance in the public policy of countries are defined on the basis of the power equation, political culture and state structure. The crisis in Gaza and the intense war waged by Israel are indicative of the fact that not only international politics is going through a period of anarchy, but there are signs of challenge in the structures of countries for making strategic decisions. When the foundations of strategic decision-making and policymaking are faced with lack of understanding, absence of strategic rationality and security challenges, it means that the principal pivots of strategic policymaking have not been taken into consideration. If we intend to consider the conceptual frameworks of conflict resolution in the Middle East, we need to pay attention to the rules of governance in this region; otherwise, we will be faced with constant, broad-based and unending challenges. Understanding the rules of governance can control and mitigate many of the security challenges of the West Asian region. In this paper, first of all, we seek to consider the rules of governance in public policymaking. Second, security signs and crisis-making challenges will be explored, and third, efforts will be made to present proper approaches to conflict resolution in the critical circumstances of the Middle East.The principal question raised by this papers is, “what signs do the foundations of governance have in the Middle East and how do they affect regional crises and strategic policies of the regional countries.” The hypothesis of the paper is, “the rules of governance in the regional security policy of the countries is based on transparency, participation, justice, productivity and accountability whiles such signs are taken into consideration by statesmen and policymakers to a limited extent in the process of making and adopting regional security decisions and policies in the Middle East.” The data analysis method was used in this paper.

Keywords


Anderson, L. (2011), Demystifying the Arab Spring: Parsing the Differences between Tunisia, Egypt, and Libya, Foreign Affairs, Vol.90, No.3, PP. 2-7.
Beblawi, H. (2001), The Renter State in the Arab State, London: Routledge.
Bennis, Phyllis (2008) Iran in the Crosshairs: How to Prevent Washington Next War, Washington Institute for Policy Studies.
Brock, Lothar, et al. (2012), Fragile States. Translated by Ahmad Rashidi, Tehran: Amir Kabir Press [in Persian].
Brown, L.C. (2009), The Struggle over Democracy in the Middle East: Region Politics and External Policies, London: Routledge.
Buzan, B. (2010), The Thought of the State and National Security, in: "Views on World Politics", edited by: Richard Little and Michael Smith, translated by Ali Reza Tayeb, Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Press [in Persian].
Buzan, B. Waver, O. and de Wilde, J. (1998), “Security: A New Framework for Analysis”, Boulder, Col: Lynne Rienner.
Castells, M. (2001), The power of identity. Translated by Hasan Chavoshian, Tehran: Tarh-e Nou Press [in Persian].
Castells, M. (2019), Networks of Anger and Hope. Translated by Mojtabi Qolipour, Tehran: Markaz Press [in Persian].
Castells, M. (2021), Rupture: The Crisis of Liberal Democracy. Translated by Mohammad Rahbari, Tehran: Agar Press [in Persian].
Cohen, S, (2011), Geopolitics of the World System. Translated by Kardan, Tehran: Abrar Mo’aser Press [in Persian].
Cooper, R. (2005), “Economic Power”, Unpublished Paper, Harvard University.
Dahl, R. A. (1997), “Power”, in David L. Sills, (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Vol. XII, New York: Free Press.
Davis, Paul, (2011) ‘Dilemmas of Intervention. Social Science for Stabilization and Reconstruction’, Rand, National Defense Research Institute.
Fierke, K. (2013), “Changing Games, Changing Strategies: Critical Investigations in Security”, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Freedman, L (2001), "A Third world war?", Survival, 43 (4).
Gause, F.G. (2011), Why Middle East Studies Missed the Arab Spring: The Myth of Authoritarian Stability, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 90, No. 4, PP.81-90.
Heydemaan, s. (2013), Authoritarian Learning and Counterrevolution: Syria and Iran Comparative Political Opposition, Comparative Politics, Vol.45, No. 4, PP. 379-397.
Hilterman, Joost, (2017), Tackling the MENA Region’s Intersecting Connects, International Crisis Group, 22 December.
Hinnbusch, R., & Heydeman, S. (Eds.), (2012), The Syrian Uprising: Domestic Origins and Early Trajectory, New York: Columbia University Press.
Inglehart, R. (2003), Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Translated by Maryam Veter, Tehran: Kavir Press [in Persian].
Inglehart, R. (1977), “The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics”, Princeton University Press.
Jackson, Robert. H, (1993), “Quasi-States: Sovereignty”, International Relations and the Third World. Cambridge University Press.
Lust-Okar, E. (2005), Divided they Rule: The Management and Manipulation of Political Opposition, Comparative Politics, Vol. 37, No. 2, PP.159-179.
Middle East and North Africa region, (2015) ‘Inequality, Uprisings, and Connects in the Arab World’, MENA Economics Monitor; and Richard Javad Heydarian, ‘Economics of the Arab Spring’, Foreign Policy in Focus, 21 April.
Sadiki, L. (2015), Routledge Handbook of the Arab Spring: Rethinking Democratization, London: Routledge.
Sarwar Abdullah, ‘Iraq’s Major Challenge is Corruption’, Fikra Forum, 2 August 2018.
Saskia Van Genugten, (2017), Drawing Lessons from Stabilization Operations in the MENA Region, BLOG, 28 November.
Satari, S. (2023), Eastern post-authority society, Quarterly of State Research, Vol. 9, pp. 1-36 [in Persian].
So, A. Y. (2022), Social change and development: Modernization, dependency and world-system theories. Translated by Mahmoud Habibi Mazaheri, Tehran: Research Institute of Strategic Studies [in Persian].