Investigating How the Virtual Public Sphere Affects Political Participation

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 PhD Student of Political Sociology, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad university, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

3 Professor of the Department of International Relations, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

With the advent of the Internet and the proliferation of tools based on it, social scientists have raised high hopes for a return to the concept of the Habermas public sphere in new media. The main question for this group of thinkers was, did the Habermas public sphere take on a new life on social media? Following the studies and researches, two categories of results can be mentioned: First, there are studies that emphasize the possibility of forming a public sphere in cyberspace. The second is the research that confirmed the impossibility of forming a public sphere in cyberspace. But a third approach has developed that,  Emphasizing the third approach, we try to examine how the virtual public sphere affects political participation .In this study, while considering these three approaches, with emphasis on the third approach, The purpose of this research is to answer the question of how the virtual public sphere affects the category of political participation. The results obtained in the conducted surveys strengthen the hypothesis that benefiting from the virtual public sphere can be effective in strengthening political participation.

Keywords

References

  1. Abbasi Qadi, Mujtaba Khalili Kashani Morteza(2013). The impact of the Internet on national identity, Tehran, Institute of Strategic Studies[ In Persian].
  2. Ahmadzade Kermany, Rohullah ( 2013). “An introduction to the phenomenology of virtual space”. Media studies, Sixth spring Number 12, 47 -74 [ In Persian].
  3. Beers, David. (2006).” The Public Sphere and Online”, Independent Journalism. Canadian Journal of Education. 29, No. (1), pp 109-130. https://doi.org/10.2307/20054149
  4. Darke, Catherine (2018). "Facebook as a contemporary public sphere: political consciousness and agency”, College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations. 243.
  5. Dahlberg, Lincoln. (2001). “Computer_ Mediated Communication and The Public Sphere”, Acritical Analysis Journal of Communicatino,7(1). http://Jcmc. Indiana.edu/ vol7/issue1/dahlbergold.htm/
  6. Dimitrova, Daniela. Shehata, Adam. Jesper, Stromback. Lars Nord (2014).” The Effects of Digital Media On Political Knowledge and Participation in Election Campaigns: Evidence from Panel Data”, Communication Research 41(1).95-118
  7. Fenton, Natalie. & Veronica Barresi (2011).” Alternative Media and Social Networking Sites: The Political Individuation and Political Participation”, The Communication Review, 14, No,3.179-196
  8. Fuchs, Christian. (2014).,” Social Media and The Public Sphere”, triple C: Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society. 12 (1), pp. 57-101 http://www.triple.at
  9. Golding, peter. (1990). Political Communication and Citizenship, In Marjorie Ferguson Public Communication The New Imperatives. London: sage.
  10. Gurley, lauren kaori.(2020).www mashable. Com.
  11. Habermas, Jürgen(2015). Theory of communicative action. Translate by Kamal Poladi, Tehran, Center publication [ In Persian].
  12. Hermida, Alfred. (2012).” Tweets and Truth: Journalism as a Discipline of Collaborative Verificative”. Journalism Practice 6(5-6). pp 659-668
  13. Huntington Samuel(1991). Political Order in Changing Societies. Translate by Mohsen salasie, Tehran, Science publication [ In Persian].
  14. Johannessen, Marius Rohde. (2013).” Social Media as Public Sphere”. Kristiansand printing office, university of Agder
  15. Khaniki Hadie(2018). Power, civil society and the press, Tehran, Review plan[ In Persian].
  16. Mahlouly, Dounia .(2013).” Rethinking The Public Sphere in a Digital Environment: Similarities between The Eighteenth and The Twenty First Centuries. University of Glasgow.Vol.20.6
  17. Mosaffa, Nasrin & Nazifpur, Ali(2022),” The Effects of the “Black Lives Matter” Movement on the International Approach of the US Government to Human Right”. The Journal of Human Rights Semi-Annual, Vol. 16, No.2, Fall 2021-Winter 2022 Issue 32, pp. 51-70
  18. Nilsen, Inga Mari. (2018). “Social Media as Digital Public Sphere, Master’s Thesis in Media and Documentation Studies”, The Artic University of Norway.
  19. Norris, P. (2001). Digital Divide? Civic Engagement, Information Poverty and The Internet in Democratic Societies. Cambridge University Press.
  20. Obar, Jonathan. A. and Wildman, Steven. (2015).” Social media definition and the governance challenge: An introduction to the special issue”. Telecommunications Policy, 39(9), 745-750.
  21. Obrien, Rory. (2003). “Civil Society: The Public Sphere and The Internet, Retrieved from www. Web. Net.pp1-11 visited: 22 Feb. 2020
  22. Papacharissi, Zizi. (2015).” Affective Publics and structures of storytelling: sentiment, events and modality, Information, Communication & Society”, DOI:10.1080l1369118X.2015.1109697 To link to this article visited: 11may. 2020: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1109697-
  23. Rheingold, Howard (1998) “The Virtual Community: (E-Book) Chapter 10: Disinformocracy”
  24. At: http://www.well.com/user/hlr/vcbook/vcbook 10. html
  25. Rosenblatt, kalahan(2020).” A summer of digital protest: How 2020 become the summer of activism both online and online”.www.nbcnews.com 26 sept, 2020.
  26. Rush, Mikel (1998). Society and politics, an introduction to political sociology. Translate by Manouchehr Sabouri, Tehran, Organization for studying and compiling humanities books of universities (Department of Humanities Research and Development Center) [ In Persian].
  27. Thornton, Alinta, L. (2001).” Does the internet create democracy? https://www.researchgate.net/scientificcontributions/Alinta-L-Thornton-2002662190. visited: 10 Feb. 2020 DOI: 10.1080/02560054.2001.9665885
  28. Turner, Jonathan. (1998),” The Structure of Sociological Theory” Sith Edition, wads worth Publishing Company. Dorsey Press.
  29. Wilson, Douay. (1991).” The Theory of Communicative action and The Problem the Commons”. Eco Policy Center, CEA, Rutgers University, New Brunswick NJ 09803 USA
  30. www htpp://carnegieendowment.org
  31. www _nbcnews_com. 26 sept,2020.
  32. www_Global protest tracker.org.
  33. Yazidi khastie bahjat, Samad Adli pour, Asie Sepehri(2013).” Content analysis of Facebook social network pages and groups with Habermas's public sphere theory”. Quarterly Journal of Social Studies and Research in Iran Volume 2, no1 87-110[ In Persian].
  34. Zakai Mohammad Saeed; Mohammad Hossein Hosni (2015). “ Typology of social media users”. Social and cultural strategy, Fifth year, number 17, 37-63 [In Persian].
Iranian Journal of Public Policy
Volume 9, Issue 1
2023
Pages 80-92

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics