A comparison between two approaches of Innovation system and sustainability transition Case study of water access challenge in Iran

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor, innovation policy IROST

2 Associate Professor, chemical engineering, IROST

3 Ph.D. Innovation policy, Mazandaran University

Abstract

The paper aims to examine the feasibility of coupling the two approaches of innovation system and sustainability transition. Differentiating between bridging and integrating as shallow and deep coupling, it will probe their philosophical foundations and how they can be integrated. It finds out, by designing a 9 layered model to compare, what are their common and distinct characteristics and how their analytical, descriptive and explanatory capacities are increased by coupling. It concludes at the end, the coupling these two approaches is only possible by shallow bridging and not deep integrating due to the limitedness of the theoretical foundations of technological innovation system.

Keywords


Andersen, M. M. 2004. "An innovation system approach to eco-innovation-Aligning policy rationales."
Bergek, A, S Jacobsson, and B Carlsson. 2008. "Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis." Research policy 37 (3): 407-429.
Binz, C., Truffer, B., & Coenen, L. (. 2014. "Why space matters in technological innovation systems—Mapping global knowledge dynamics of membrane bioreactor technology." Research Policy, 43(1) 138-155.
Coenen, Lars, and Fernando J.Díaz Lopez. 2008. "competitiveness, Comparing systemic approaches to innovation for sustainability and sustainability and competitiveness." DIME International Conference “Innovation, Sustainability and Policy. Delft Netherlands: TNO Built Environment and Geosciences.
Edquist, C. 2005. systems of innovation: perspectives and challenges. [book auth.] J., Mowery, D.C., Nelson, R.R. (Eds.), Fagerberg. The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Elzen, Boelie, Frank W. Geels, Peter S. Hofman, and Ken Green. 2004. "Socio-technical scenarios as a tool for transition policy: An example from the traffic and transport domain." System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability 251-281.
F.W. Geels, A. McMeekina, B. Pflugar. 2020. "Socio-technical scenarios as a methodological tool to explore social and political feasibility in low-carbon transitions: Bridging computer models and the multi-level perspective in UK electricity generation (2010–2050)." Technological forecasting and social change.
Floortje Alkemade, Simona Negro and Marko P. Hekkert. 2011. "Transition policy and innovation policy: friends or foes?" Innovation studies; Utrecht University Paper presented at the DIME Final Conference,, 6-8 April . Utretcht : Utrecht university press.
Frank W. Geels, Frans Berkhout and Detlef P. van Vuuren. 2016,. "Bridging different analytical approach for sustainability transition ." Nature : Climate change  | DOI: 10.1038/NCLIMATE2980.
Geels, F. 2004. "From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems,Insights about dynamics and change from sociologyand institutional theory." Research Policy 33: 897–920.
Geels, F. W. 2002. "Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study." Research policy 31 (8-9): 1257-1274.
Geels, F. W. 2020. "Micro-foundations of the multi-level perspective on socio-technical transitions: Developing a multi-dimensional model of agency through crossovers between social constructivism, evolutionary economics and neo-institutional theory." technological Forecasting and social change. 152 119894.
Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. T. 2007. "ypology of sociotechnical transition pathways." Research policy, 36(3), 399-417.
Geels, F. W., and B. Verhees. 2011. "Cultural legitimacy and framing struggles in innovation journeys: a cultural-performative perspective and a case study of Dutch nuclear energy (1945–1986)." Technological Forecasting and Social Change 78 (6): 910-930.
Geels, F. W., Kern, F., Fuchs, G., Hinderer, N., Kungl, G., Mylan, J., ... & Wassermann, S. 2016. "The enactment of socio-technical transition pathways: a reformulated typology and a comparative multi-level analysis of the German and UK low-carbon electricity." (Research policy ) 45 (4).
Geels, F.W. 2005. "The dynamics of transitions in socio-technical systems: a multi-level analysis of the transition pathway fromhorse-drawn carriages to automobiles (1860–1930)." Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 17 (4): 445–476.
Geels, Frank. 2011, . "The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven layers." Environmental innovation and social transition,(1): 1 24-40.
Genus, A., & Coles, A. M. 2008. "Rethinking the multi-level perspective of technological transitions." Research Policy 1436-1445.
Govindan, K. 2018. "Sustainable consumption and production in the food supply chain: A conceptual framework." International Journal of Production Economics 195: 419-431.
Grimes, Marrian Lewis and Andrews. 1999. "Metatriangulation : BUILDING THEORY." Academy review of management, 4 (24) 672-690.
Jansma, S. R., J. F. Gosselt, and M. D. de Jong. 2018. "Technological start-ups in the innovation system: an actor-oriented perspective." Technology analysis & strategic management 30 (3): 282-294.
Kanda, W., P. del Río, O. Hjelm, and D. Bienkowska. 2019. "A technological innovation systems approach to analyse the roles of intermediaries in eco-innovation." Journal of Cleaner Production 277: 1136-1148.
Kemp, R., and J. Rotmans. 2005. Transition management: managing the co-evolution of technical, environmental and social systems. In K. Weber, Towards Environmental Innovation Systems. Heidelberg: Springer.
Köhler, J., Braungardt, S., Hettesheimer, T., Lerch, C., Nabitz, L., Sartorius, C., & Walz, R. . 2016. The dynamic simulation of TIS functions in transitions pathways . Fraunhofer ISI Discussion Papers-Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis.(No. 48).
Köhler, J., Geels, F. W., Kern, F., Markard, J., Onsongo, E., Wieczorek, A., ... & Fünfschilling, L. 2019. " An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions." Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 31, .
Köhler, Jonathan et al. 2019. "An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions." Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions .
Kooijman, M., Meer, P., Moors, E. H. M., Schellekens, H., & Hekkert, M. P. . 2012. "Understanding transition dynamics using a combined TIS-MLP approach." In STS-conferences. August : Technical University of Denmark.
Kuhlman, Stefan. 2018. "Next-Generation Innovation Policy and Grand Challenges." Science and Public policy S, Volume 45, Issue 4, August 2018, 448–454.
Liu, G. 2017. Government Intervention in Technological Innovation System in Catching-up Context: Comparative Case Study. Manchester: Manchester University (Doctoral dissertation).
Lopez, Lars CoenenFernando Javier Diaz LopezFernando Javier Diaz. 2008. "competitiveness, Comparing systemic approaches to innovation for sustainability and sustainability and competitiveness." DIME International Conference “Innovation, Sustainability and Policy. Delft Netherlands: TNO Built Environment and Geosciences.
Markard, , J, and B Truffer. 2008. "Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards an integrated framework. Research policy." Research policy 37 (4): 596-615.
Markard, J. 2020. "The life cycle of technological innovation systems." Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 15 119407.
Markard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. 2012. "Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects." Research policy, 41(6) 955-967.
Meelan, T and Frala. 2013. "Towards an integrated framework for analysing sustaianable innovation policy." Technological analysis & strategic 957-970.
Mohammadreza Zolfaghariana, Bob Walrave, Bob Roven, George Romme. 2019. "Studying transitions: Past, present, and future." Research Policy (48):9.
Moro, Mariú Abritta. 2018. An Evolutionary Approach to Water Innovation: Comparing the Water Innovation,Comparing the Water Innovation Systems in China. Lyngby: Technical University of Denmark .
Paula Kivimaa, Wouter Boon, Sampsa Hyysalo, Laurens Klerk. 2019. "Towards a typology of intermediaries in sustainability transitions: A systematic review and a research agenda." Research Policy ,48 1065-1075.
Planko, J., J. Cramer, M. P. Hekkert, and M. M. Chappin. 2017. "Combining the technological innovation systems framework with the entrepreneurs’ perspective on innovation." Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 29 (6): 614-625.
Rånge, M., and M. Sandberg. 2016. "Windfall gains or eco-innovation?‘Green’evolution in the Swedish innovation system." Environmental Economics and Policy Studies 18 (2): 229-246.
Raven, R., & Walrave, B. 2020. "Overcoming transformational failures through policy mixes in the dynamics of technological innovation systems." Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 153, 119297.
Roberts, C., and F. W. Geels. 2019. "Conditions and intervention strategies for the deliberate acceleration of socio-technical transitions: lessons from a comparative multi-level analysis of two historical case studies in Dutch and Danish heating." Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 31 (9): 1081-1103.
Rohracher, K.Mathias Weber and Herald. 2012. "legitimizing research, technology and innovation for transformative change ." Research policy, 41 1037-1047.
Rotmans, J., Kemp, R., & Van Asselt, M. 2001. " More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy." Foresight-The journal of future studies, strategic thinking and policy, 3(1) 15-31.
Sattar, U. 2020. "How Socio-Technical Landscape Can Innovate Energy Transitions in Cities? A Conceptual Framework." Int. J. Res. Innov. Soc. Sci 210-214.
Saunders, M. N. K., Lewis, Philip, Thornhill, Adrian. 2019. Research methods for business students. New york: Pearson Edition Academic, 8th edition.
Smith, A., & Stirling, A. 2010. "The politics of social-ecological resilience and sustainable socio-technical transitions." Ecology and Society,15(1).
Smith, A., A. Stirling, and F. Berkhout. 2005. "The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions." Research policy 34 (10): 1491-1510.
Steinmueller, Johan Schot. Edward. . 2018. "Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change." Research Policy. 47 Vol. 9, PP.1554-1567.
Suurs, R. A. 2009. Motors of sustainable innovation: Towards a theory on the dynamics of technological innovation system. Utretcht: Utretcht University.
Suurs, R. A., and M. P. Hekkert. 2009. "Cumulative causation in the formation of a technological innovation system: The case of biofuels in the Netherlands." Technological Forecasting and Social Change 76 (8): 1003-1020.
Tolk, Andereas. 2012. Ontology, Epistemology, and Teleology for Modeling and Simulation: Philosophical Foundations for Intelligent M&S Applications. Norfolk: Old Dominion University .
Tukker, A., M. Charter, C. Vezzoli, E. Stø, and M. Andersen. 2017. "System innovation for sustainability 1: Perspectives on radical changes to sustainable consumption and production." Routledge.
Turnheim, B., Asquith, M., & Geels, F. W. 2020. " Making sustainability transitions research policy-relevant: Challenges at the science-policy interface." Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions,, 34 ed.
Walz, R. 2018. " New developments in eco-innovation researchTowards a dynamic understanding of innovation systems: An integrated TIS-MLP approach for wind turbines." In New developments in eco-innovation research, 277-295. Cham: Springer, .
Wang, C., P. Ghadimi, M. K. Lim, and M. L. Tseng. 2019. "A literature review of sustainable consumption and production: A comparative analysis in developed and developing economies." Journal of Cleaner Production 206: 741-754.
Weber, K. M., & Rohracher, H. . 2012. "Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change: Combining insights from innovation systems and multi-level perspective in a comprehensive ‘failures’ framework." Research Policy, 41 (6) 1037-1047.
Wieczorek, A. J., and M. P Hekkert. 2012. "Systemic instruments for systemic innovation problems: A framework for policy makers and innovation scholars." Science and Public Policy 39 (1): 74-87.
کوهن, توماس. 1369. ساختار انقلابات علمی (مترجم احمد آرام ). تهران : سروش .
میرعمادی, طاهره. 1398. "روندهای نوآیند در سیاست."