Designing A Policy Mix for the Development of East Azerbaijan Innovation Ecosystem; Case Study: Auto Parts Manufacturing Industry

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor of STI, National Research Institute of Science Policy

2 Professor of IT Management, Tarbiat Modares University

3 PHD Student of STI Policy Making, Tarbiat Modares University

Abstract

Despite its various technological capabilities, East Azerbaijan Province is one of the most unsuccessful research regions in terms of innovation typology. Therefore, in accordance with the dependence of innovation on the characteristics of regions, this article seeks to design a policy mix for the development of regional innovation ecosystem in East Azerbaijan Province. For this purpose, first, based on the grounded theory strategy and via interview, the experiences of senior managers of the province are extracted and translated to a local framework for designing a policy mix for the development of regional innovation ecosystem in the province was developed. Then the framework is implemented in the auto parts manufacturing industry. Based on the research findings, attracting the participation of a wide range of stakeholders, aligning with horizontal and vertical policies, paying attention to the regional innovation infrastructure and emphasizing on trans-regional integration are highlighted in the macro model of innovation policy. Also the importance of typology, ecosystem components' exploration, CSF identification and life cycle analysis in the evaluation of innovation ecosystems was also emphasized, and finally the necessity of the evaluation of the probable effects of the policy tools and the further planning for the implemention of the policy mix was explained.

Keywords


 
1 - اسکندرزاده فرد، توحید؛ و بهلولی، نادر (1399). نقش شرکت‌های پیشرو و خوشه‌های کسب و کار در نوآوری منطقه‌ای. نشریه ابتکار و خلاقیت در علوم انسانی، 10(1)، 187-161.
2 - رفیعی، نسترن؛ فتاحی، سجاد؛ چغازردی، جلال و درودی، مسعود (1396). مسئله‌شناسی راهبردی توسعه در استان آذربایجان شرقی. مرکز بررسی‌های استراتژیک ریاست جمهوری
3 - ریاحی، پریسا؛ و قاضی نوری، سید سپهر؛ حاجی حسینی، حجت اله (1392). گونه شناسی رفتار نوآوری استان‌های ایران با تاکید بر عوامل اجتماعی، فصلنامه سیاست علم و فناوری، 5(4)، 61-47.
4 - سازمان مدیریت و برنامه‌ریزی استان آذربایجان شرقی (1394). سند تدبیر توسعه آذربایجان شرقی.
5 - طباطبائیان، سید حبیب‌الله (1398). سند راهبردی پنج‌ساله علم، فناوری و نوآوری استان آذربایجان شرقی. شورای عالی علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری.
6 - قاضی نوری، سید سپهر؛ و ریاحی، پریسا (1396). گونه شناسی رفتار نوآوری در استان های ایران: رویکرد اجتماعی. انتشارات صفار.
7 - وزارت تعاون، کار و رفاه اجتماعی (1395). خلاصه مدیریت مطالعات استانی طرح توسعه کسب و کار و اشتغال پایدار (تکاپو) استان آذربایجان شرقی.
8 - هولزبرگر، ماریان؛ فرولیخ، جوزف؛ و ناظمی، امیر (1397). همکاری RTI میان ایران و اتریش چشم‌انداز فعالیت مشترک در بخش خودرو/
9- Adner, R. (2006). Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Harvard business review, 84(4), 98.
10- Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2010). Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic management journal, 31(3), 306-333.
11- Boekholt, P. (2010). The Evolution of Innovation Paradigms and their Influence on Research, Technological Development and Innovation Policy Instrument; In Smits, R. E., Kuhlman, S. and Shapira, P., "The theory and practice of innovation policy", Edward Elgar Publishing Inc. USA.
12- Borrás, S., & Edquist, C. (2013). The choice of innovation policy instruments. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(8), 1513-1522.
13- Bramwell, A., Hepburn, N., & Wolfe, D. A. (2012). Growing innovation ecosystems: University-industry knowledge transfer and regional economic development in Canada. Knowledge Synthesis Paper on Leveraging Investments in HERD. Final Report to the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.
14- Brusco, S. (1982). The Emilian model: productive decentralisation and social integration. Cambridge journal of economics, 6(2), 167-184.
15- Caloffi, A. and Mariani, M., 2018. Regional policy mixes for enterprise and innovation: A fuzzy-set clustering approach. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 36(1), pp.28-46.
16- Carlsson, B. (2006). Internationalization of innovation systems: A survey of the literature. Research policy, 35(1), 56-67.
17- Cooke, P. (2002). Knowledge economies: Clusters, learning and cooperative advantage. Routledge.
18- Cooke, P., Asheim, B., Boschma, R., Martin, R., Schwartz, D., & Todtling, F. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook of regional innovation and growth. Edward Elgar Publishing.
19- Doloreux, D. (2002). What we should know about regional systems of innovation. Technology in society, 24(3), 243-263.
20- Enright, M. J. (2003). Regional clusters: what we know and what we should know. In Innovation clusters and interregional competition (pp. 99-129). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
21- Estrin, J. (2008). Closing the innovation gap: Reigniting the spark of creativity in a global economy. McGraw Hill Professional.
22- Flanagan, K., Uyarra, E., & Laranja, M. (2011). Reconceptualizing the ‘policy mix’ for innovation. Research Policy, 40(5), 702-713.
23- Freeman, C, (1987), Technology policy and economic performance: Lessons from Japan, London Pinter Publishers.
24- Georghiou, L., Smith, K., Toivanen, O., & Ylä-Anttila, P. (2003). Evaluation of the Finnish innovation support system. Publications, 5, 2003.
25- Goldkuhl, G., & Cronholm, S. (2010). Adding theoretical grounding to grounded theory: Toward multi-grounded theory. International journal of qualitative methods, 9(2), 187-205.
26- Henderson, D. (2000). EU Regional Innovation Strategies: regional experimentalism in practice?. European Urban and Regional Studies, 7(4), 347-358.
27- Jackson, D. J. (2011). What is an innovation ecosystem? National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA.
28- Keeble, D., & Wilkinson, F. (2000). High-technology clusters, networking and collective learning in Europe Ashgate. Aldershot-2000b High-technology SMEs, regional clustering and collective learning: an overview in Keeble D and Wilkinson F eds High-technology clusters, networking and collective learning in Europe Ashgate, Aldershot, 1(20), 1993.
29- Kern, F., & Howlett, M. (2009). Implementing transition management as policy reforms: a case study of the Dutch energy sector. Policy Sciences, 42(4), 391-408.
30- Magro, E., & Wilson, J. R. (2013). Complex innovation policy systems: Towards an evaluation mix. Research Policy, 42(9), 1647-1656.
31- Mashelkar, R. A. (2012, November). On building an inclusive innovation ecosystem. In Conference on Innovation for Inclusive Development.
32- Mercan, B., & Goktas, D. (2011). Components of innovation ecosystems: A cross-country study. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 76, 102-112.
33- Nauwelaers, C., & Wintjes, R. (2003). Conclusions and perspectives: adapting old policy institutions to new challenges. Innovation Policy in Europe: Measurement and Strategy, 286.
34- OECD Publishing (2012). OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2012. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
35- Papaioannou, T., Wield, D., & Chataway, J. (2009). Knowledge ecologies and ecosystems? An empirically grounded reflection on recent developments in innovation systems theory. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 27(2), 319-339.
36- Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. Harvard business review, 68(2), 73-93.
37- Saxenian, A. (1994). Regional networks: industrial adaptation in Silicon Valley and route 128.
38- Scott, A. J. (1988). Flexible production systems and regional development: the rise of new industrial spaces in North America and Western Europe. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 12(2), 171-186.
39- Smith, K. (2000). Innovation as a systemic phenomenon: rethinking the role of policy. Enterprise and innovation management studies, 1(1), 73-102.
40- Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all?: Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy, 34(8), 1203-1219.