The Model of Economical Transparency for Iran

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 PhD student of Public Policy at University of Tehran

2 Full professor of Public Policy group at University of Tehran

3 Assistant Professor, Faculty of management, Tehran University

4 professor of Industrial Management group at Tarbiat Modares University

5 Assistant Professor. Economics Department ,University of Tehran,

Abstract

Economical Transparency can be determined for governments through Corruption Perception Index (CPI). In this research with studying Iran and Singapore, has been tried to find appropriate Governance Model and its related policies for achieving success in improving government economic transparency. Based on this aim, the researcher interviewed with 13 political and policy experts which is complementary with analyzed formal documents. The research methodology is case study with descriptive-qualitative content analysis technique. For checking dependability and confirmability, research process and results have been reviewed and confirmed by 5 experts. Also according to our calculations, test-retest reliability was 0.84 and Cohen’s Kappa was 0.78 that make us trust to the results. According to the results, the best governance model for government economic transparency is “network governance” with 9 categories and 24 subcategories of policies.

Keywords

References

1- تدلی، چالز؛ تشکری، عباس (2009). ترجمه: آذر، عادل؛ جهانیان، سعید (1395). «مبانی پژوهش ترکیبی»، سازمان انتشارات جهاد دانشگاهی، چاپ اول.
2- خواستار، حمزه (1388). «ارایه‌ی روشی برای محاسبه‌ی پایایی مرحله‌ی کدگذاری در مصاحبه‌های پژوهشی»، روش­شناسی علوم انسانی، دوره 15، شماره 58.
3- دانایی فرد، حسن (1395). «نهضت­های مدیریتی در بخش دولتی: گذشته، حال، و آینده». تهران: سازمان مطالعه و تدوین کتب علوم انسانی دانشگاه­ها (سمت). چاپ 1.
4- شاه آبادی، ابوالفضل و پورجوان، عبدالله (1389). «حکمرانی، رقابت­پذیری و رشد اقتصادی کشورهای منتخب». راهبرد توسعه. شماره 22 (تابستان)، صص 168-129.
5- عادل مهربان، مرضیه (1394). «مروری بر تحلیل محتوای کیفی و کاربرد آن در پژوهش»، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی اصفهان. چاپ 1.
6- عبدالملکی، حجت الله (1395). «اقتصادمقاومتی: درآمدی بر مبانی، سیاست­ها و برنامه عمل». تهران: انتشارات بسیج دانشجویی دانشگاه امام صادق (ع). چاپ 3.
7- قلی پور، رحمت اله (1384). تحلیل رابطه الگوی حکمرانی خوب و فساد اداری، فرهنگ مدیریت، سال سوم، شماره دهم، صص 127-103.
8- محسنی، قاسم(1393). «شفافیت و انضباط مالی دستاورد اقتصاد مقاومتی است». بورس. شماره 114 و 115 (مرداد و شهریور). صص 23-21.
9- هاشمی شاهرودی، سید محمود (1394). «نظارت و بازرسی». انتشارات بنیاد فقه و معارف اهل بیت علیهم السلام. چاپ 1.
10- هدی، فرل، ترجمه: الوانی، سید مهدی؛ و معمارزاده طهران، غلامرضا. (1381). اداره امور عمومی تطبیقی (مدیریت تطبیقی). انتشارات اندیشه های گوهربار. چاپ اول.
11- هزاوئی، سید مرتضی و علی زیرکی حیدری(1393). «اقتصاد مقاومتی؛ نماد مدیریت جهادی در اقتصاد سیاسی ایران». مطالعات انقلاب اسلامی. سال یازدهم. شماره 37 (تابستان). صص 26-9.
12- Amiri, H., Karmi, M. H., Toussi, A., & Javanmard, R. 2017. “Impact of Economic Transparency on Economic Growth in the Middle East Countries”. International Journal of Business and Development Studies, 9 (2). pp. 115-138.
13- Bauhr, M., & Grimes, M. 2012. “What is Government Transparency? : New Measures and Relevance for Quality of Government”. The Quality of Government Institute: University of Gothenburg. Vol. 16. pp. 1-27.
14- Chiang Shih, Mei. 2010. “Trust and Transparency in Network Governance: The Implication of Taiwan’s Anticorruption Activities”. International Public Management Review. Electronic Journal at http://www.ipmr.net. Vol.11, No. 2.
15- Denhardt, R. B. 2011. “Theories of Public Organization”. Boston: Cengage Learning. 6th edition.
16- Denhardt, R. B. & Catlaw, T. 2014. “Theories of public organization”, USA: Cengage Learning.
17- Douglas, S., & Meijer, A. 2016. “Transparency and Public Value: Analyzing the Transparency Practices and Value Creation of Public Utilities”. International Journal of Public Administration.
18- Fairbanks, J., D. Plowman, K., & L. Rawlins, B. 2007. “Transparency in government communication”. Journal of Public Affairs, vol. 7, pp. 23–37.
19- Flyverbom, M., Christensen, L. T., & Hansen, H. K.2015. “The Transparency–Power Nexus”. Management Communication Quarterly. Vol. 29. No. 3.
20- Grandy, C. 2009. “The Efficient Public Administrator: Pareto and a Well-Rounded Approach to Public Administration”. Public Administration Review, Vol. 69, pp. 1115-1123.
21- Harper, M., & Cole, P. 2012. “Member Checking: Can Benefits Be Gained Similar to Group Therapy?”. The Qualitative Report. Vol. 17. No. 2, pp. 1-8.
22- Hin, Koh Tech (2011). “Corruption Control in Singapore”, UNAFEI: Resource Material No.83
23- Howlett, M., Poocharoen, O., & Kekez, A. 2017. “Understanding Co-Production as a Policy Tool”. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, Vol. 19. No. 5, pp. 487-501.
24- Howlett, M. 2011. “Designing Public Policies: Principles and Instruments”. Routledge text books in policy studies.
25- Karhula, P. 2015. “Freedom of speech in the internet era: Transparency and redefining boundaries”: Finland, Scandinavian Library Quarterly, No.3.
26- Kvale, Steinar. 1996. Interviews: An Introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks,CA: Sage.
27- Landis, J.R. & G.G. Koch. “The Measurementof Observed Agreement for Categorical”, Data Biometrics, 1997, pp 159-174.
28- Lincoln, Y. and Guba, E. 1985. Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: CA: Sage.
29- Lindstedt, C. and Naurin, D. 2006. “Transparency Against Corruption: A Cross-Country Analysis”, 20th World Congress of the IPSA, Fukuoka, Japan.
30- Osborne, S. P. 2006. “The New Public Governance?”.Public Management Review, Vol. 8. No. 3, pp. 377-387.
31- Oracle: Public Sector (2012). Transparency in the Public Sector: Its Importance and How Oracle Supports Governments Efforts, An Oracle White Paper.
32- Rutgers, M. R. & Van Der Meer, H. 2010. “The Origins and Restriction of Efficiency in Public Administration Regaining Efficiency as the Core Value of Public Administration”. Administration & Society, Vol. 42, pp. 755-779.
33- TI. 2017. “Corruption Perception Index 2016: Full Source Description”.
34- TI. 2018. “Corruption Perception Index 2017”. Retrieved 02 May 2018.
35- Wu, X., & He, J. 2009. “Paradigm shift in public administration”. Public Administration Review, Vol. 69. No. 1, pp. 21-28.
36- Yin, Robert K. (2009). “Case Study Research Design and Methods”, Applied Social Research Methods Series, Sage Publications, Fourth edition, Volume 5.
Iranian Journal of Public Policy
Volume 6, Issue 4
2020
Pages 133-150

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics