Providing a legal framework for accountability in the operation of "Internet of Things" tools in the context of e-government

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

PhD student in private law, Judicial Sciences and Administrative Services University

Abstract

IoT technology, which is interpreted as the Internet of Things, is an emerging technology that poses a number of challenges, including "accountability frameworks." The main question of the present study is that what legal policies need to be adopted to provide a legal framework in the field of "responsibility" of these tools? To answer the above question, this study uses documentary research and a comparative study between the rules governing the legal system of Iran and the European Union. These tools are the necessary policies to improve the monitoring of the performance of these tools and the policy of the performance of IoT tools and their controllers in relation to the rules of responsibility. To implement the policies announced above, the implementation of some policy recommendations such as creating public awareness, holding training courses for employees of companies, anticipating mechanisms to protect information owners, anticipating the mechanism for issuing digital signatures and amending laws can Be efficient.

Keywords

References

1- آقایی طوق، مسلم،(1398) ، سازوکار و چالشهای پیاده سازی بستر بلاک چین در توسعه دولت الکترونیکی و آثار آن بر نظام مالیاتی، فصلنامه حقوق اداری، سال ششم، شماره 19
2- اسلامی تبار، امیر،(1399)، کارکرد بلاک چین در حمایت از کپی رایت، فصلنامه پژوهش حقوق خصوصی، سال هشتم، شماره 30
3- صادقی، محسن، ناصر، مهدی،(1397)، ملاحظاتی برای سیاستگذاری حقوقی قراردادهای هوشمند، فصلنامه سیاستگذاری عمومی، دوره چهارم، شماره2
4- صادقی، حسین، زرعی، حمیده،(1398)، چالشهای اعطای وام های فاین تک:سیاستگذاری و راهکارهای بانک جهانی، صندوق بین المللی پول و نظام حقوقی اتحادیه اروپا، فصلنامه مطالعات بین المللی، سال شانزدهم، شماره 64
5- مرکزمالمیری، احمد(1390)،تاملی در مرزهای سیاستگذاری و قانونگذاری (مطالعه موردی: مفاد قانون برنامه پنجم توسعه در حوزه فرهنگی)، فصلنامه مجلس و راهبرد، دوره 18، شماره 67
6- ناصر، مهدی،(1397)، قراردادهای هوشمند: مطالعه تطبیقی حقوق ایران و آمریکا، چاپ اول، تهران، انتشارات مجد
7- Crabtree,(2017), Accountable Internet of Things? Outline of the IoT databox model, https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7974335, online edition
8- Ewa Luger, Stuart Moran, and Tom Rodden,(2013), ‘Consent for all’ Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Social Sciences and Administrative Services
9- Gartner Newsroom(Last visited 12 Aug2019), Gartner, ‘Gartner Says 8.4 Billion Connected "Things" Will Be in Use in 2017, Up 31 Percent From 2016’, https://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/3598917
10- Ian Brown, (Last Visited 8Aug 2019), Regulation and the Internet of Things(International Telecommunications Union 2015), https://www.itu.int/en/ITUD/Conferences/GSR/Documents/GSR2015/Discussion_papers_and_Presentations/GSR_DiscussionPaper_IoT.pdf
11- Jatinder Singh, Christopher Millard, Chris Reed, Jennifer Cobbe, Jon Crowcroft,(2019), Accountability in the Internet of Things (IoT): Systems, law & ways forward, Social Science Research Network
12- Karen Rose, (Last Visited 28 May 2019), Internet of Things:An Overview(Internet Society 2015),https://www.sfbayisoc.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/ISOC-IOT-FEB-2016-Rose.pdf
13- Konstantinos Christidis and Michael Devetsikiotis,(2016) ‘Blockchains and Smart Contracts for the Internet of Things’, IEEE Access, vol. 4
14- Lachlan Urquhart, Neelima Sailaja, and Derek McAuley, (2017)  Realising the right to data portability for the domestic internet of things’ Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, vol. 22
15- Lachlan Urquhart, Tom Lodge, Andy Crabtree,(2019), Demonstrably doing accountability in the Internet of Things, International Journal of Law and Information Technology,Vol27
16- Lilian Edwards and Michael Veale,(2017), ‘Slave to the algorithm? Why a ‘right to an explanation’ is probably not the remedy you are looking for’ Duke Law and Technology Review, vol. 16
17- Marshall, Brooke Adele,(2012) «Reconsidering The Proper Law of The Contract», Melbourne Journal of International Law, Vol 13
18- Martin Abrams(Last Visited 13Aug2019), Data Protection Accountability: The Essential Element, (Centre for Information Policy Leadership, Brussels 2009) https://www.hunton.com/files/webupload/CIPL_Galway_Accountability_Paper.pdf
19- McAuley&Etc,(2018), Building accountability into the Internet of Things: the IoT Databox model,online Edition: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6560684/
20- Peter Tolmie, Peter, Andy Crabtree, Tom Rodden, James Colley and Ewa Luger ,(2016) ‘This has to be the cats’ - personal data legibility in networked sensing systems.’ Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, Social Sciences and Administrative Services
21- Stephen camba ,(2015)Sasines registration abrief guide the land registration act 2012 https://www.ros.gov.uk/services/registration/land-register/faqs/essential-guide-to-the-2012-act.
Iranian Journal of Public Policy
Volume 6, Issue 3
December 2021
Pages 81-103

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics