An Institutional Framework for Regulating New Business Models: A Case Study of Application-based Transportation

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor at Technology Studies Institute, Tehran

2 PhD student in STI policy, University of Tehran., Tehran.

3 PhD in Economics, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. Researcher at Technology Studies Institute

Abstract

Business model innovation is application of a different business model to an existing economic sector, which can lead to elimination of businesses in sectors and will change the governance. This shift, raises the question of the appropriateness of existing regulation and highlights need to re-design the regulatory system, considering common-pool resources. The solution for regulating new businesses in order to meet the interests of the general public, existing and new businesses, is polycentric governance and to recognize the role of nongovernmentals. This paper provides a framework for regulation of new business models using the Ostrom framework and the application-based transportation has been selected as the case-study. The findings suggest that the centralization of national governance within the Ministry of the Interior at the constitutional level and oversight by the union, coupled with local governance at the municipal level at the collective choice level, would be an appropriate framework.

Keywords

References

1 - حسینی، س.، مهدوی عادلی، م.، و رزمی، م. (1394). تحلیل حقوق مالکیت در پرتو الگوی نهادی استرم و دلالت‌های آن برای خط‌مشی‌‌گذاری عمومی. دانشگاه امام صادق علیه السلام، 8(1)، 135–156.
2 - حسینی، س.، مهدوی عادلی، م.، و رزمی، م. (1393). خوانشی نهادی از نظام مسائل سیاستگذاری در حقوق مالکیت؛ مطالعه موردی صنعت نفت ایران. پژوهشنامه حقوق اسلامی، 15(40)، 29–54.
3- Aligica, P. D., & Boettke, P. (2011). The Two Social Philosophies of Ostroms’ Institutionalism. Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), 29–49.
4- Arnold, E., & Boekholt, P. (2002). The Governance of Research and Innovation An international comparative study. (December).
5- Cramer, J., & Krueger, A. B. (2016). Disruptive Change in the Taxi Business: The Case of Uber. American Economic Review, 106(5), 177–182.
6- Dempsey, P. S. (1996). Taxi Industry Regulation, Deregulation &(and) Reregulation: The Paradox of Market Failure. Transportation Law Journal, 24. Retrieved from https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/tportl24&id=81&div=&collection=
7- Demsetz, H. (1967). Toward a Theory of Property Rights. The American Economic Review, 57(2), 347–359.
8- Greg Dickinson. (2018). How the world is going to war with Uber. Retrieved July 30, 2019, from https://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/news/where-is-uber-banned/
9- Kim, J., & Hwang, J. (2019). The Future of Local Governance for Appropriately Adapting the Ride-Sharing Platform: Case Study of Seoul, New York, and Maryland. Retrieved from http://dlc.dlib.indiana.edu.
10- Laranja, M. (2012). Network governance of innovation policies: The Technological Plan in Portugal. Science and Public Policy, 39(5), 655–668.
11- Majchrzak, A., Nambisan, S., Lyytinen, K., & Song, M. (2017). Digital Innovation Management: Reinventing Innovation Management Research in a Digital World. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2017/41:1.03
12- Markides, C. (2006, January). Disruptive innovation: In need of better theory. Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 23, pp. 19–25.
13- Ostrom, E. (1999). PRIVATE AND COMMON PROPERTY RIGHTS Elinor. 97(Libecap 2008), 1175–1191.
14- Ostrom, E. (2000). American Economic Association Collective Action and the Evolution of Social Norms. Source: The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 137–158.
15- Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press.
16- Ostrom, E. (2011). Background on the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework. The Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), 7–27.
17- Ostrom, E., Ostrom, V., Sabetti, F., & Aligică, P. D. (2014). Choice, rules and collective action : the Ostroms on the study of institutions and governance.
18- Rickne, A., Læstadius, S., & Etzkowitz, H. (2012). Innovation Governance in an Open Economy: Shaping Regional Nodes in a Globalized World. Routledge.
19- Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2012). Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data. Sage Publishing.
20- Samuelson, P. A. (1954). The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 36(4), 387.
21- Visser, J., Rienstra, S., & Bakker, P. (2015). International comparison of taxi regulations and Uber. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285235126
Iranian Journal of Public Policy
Volume 6, Issue 1
June 2020
Pages 9-34

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics