1- انصاری پیرسرایی، زربخش (1392). بررسی راههای عملیاتی مقابله با پولشویی در سطح ملی و جهانی. پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه گیلان.
2- صفدری، اکبر (1392). مفاهیم مقررات و روشهای مبارزه با پولشویی در سیستم بانکی. تهران: موسسه عالی مدیریت دانش.
3- عابدی جعفری، حسن؛ تسلیمی، محمدسعید؛ فقیهی، ابوالحسن؛ شیخ زاده، محمد (1390). تحلیل مضمون و شبکه مضامین: روشی ساده و کارآمد برای تبیین الگوهای موجود در دادههای کیفی. اندیشه مدیریت راهبردی، سال پنجم، شماره دوم، صص 151-198.
4- موسوی، سید شاهین؛ معدنی، جواد. (1396). خطمشیهای مبارزه با پولشویی در سیستم بانکداری کشورهای منتخب. تهران: دا.
5- Banning EB. Archaeological survey. New York; London: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 2002.
6- Basel AML Index Report. (2016). Steinenring 60 | 4051 Basel, Switzerland | +41 61 205 55 11, info@baselgovernance.org |
www.baselgovernance.org.
7- Boyatzis, R. E. (1998), Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and code development, Sage.
8- Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2013), “Teaching thematic analysis: Overcoming challenges and developing strategies for effective learning”,Qualitative Research in Psychology, Vol. 3, The Psychologist, 26 (2). pp. 120-123. ISSN 0952-8229.
9- C. van Woerkum. (1999). Interactive policy-making: The principles. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, vol. 6, no. 4.
10- De Vries, M. (2005). Generations of interactive policy-making in the Netherlands. International Review of Administrative Sciences December 2005 vol. 71 no. (4) 577-591.
11- Driessen, P. J., Glasbergen, P & Verdaas, D. (2001). Interactive policy-making - a model of management for public works. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001, vol. 128, issue 2, 322-337.
12- Dye, T. R. (2017). Understanding Public Policy, 15rd Ed., Florida State University, Published by Pearson.
13- Edelenbos; J., Klok, P-J. & van Tatenhove, J. (2009). The institutional embedding of interactive policy making: Insights from a comparative research based on eight interactive projects in the Netherlands. American Review of Public Administration, Volume 39 - Issue 2 p. 125- 148.
15- Gnutzmann, H; McCarthy, K & Unger, B. (2010). Dancing with the devil: Country size and the incentive to tolerate money laundering. International Review of Law and Economics, Volume 30, Issue 3, September 2010, Pages 244–252.
16- Hill, M. & Hupe, P. (2014). Implementing Public Policy: An Introduction to the Study of Operational Governance. Third Edition. SAGE Publications Ltd.
17- Lin, T.c. (2016). Financial Weapons of War. Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 100, p. 1377.
18- Nikoloska, S & Simonovski, I. (2012). Role of banks as entity in the system for prevention of money laundering in the Macedonia, Social and Behavioral Sciences 44 (2012) 453 – 459.
19- Rose-Ackerman, S & Carrington, P. (2013). Anti-corruption policy. Can International Actors Play a Constructive Role Carolina Academic Press.
20- Ryan, G. W. & Bernard, H. R. (2000), “Data Management and Analysis Methods”, In Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (Pp.769-802.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21- Srinagar, M.A. (2016). Anti-Money-laundering Policy of the Bank.The Jammu & Kashmir Bank Ltd. Pp.1-5.
22- Sullivan, K. (2015). Anti-Money Laundering in a Nutshell: Awareness and Compliance for Financial Personnel and Business Managers. 1st ed. Edition by Apress.
24- Tummers, L. & Karsten, N. (2011), “Reflecting on the Role of Literature in Qualitative Public Administration Research: Learning from Grounded Theory”, Administration & Society, published online 24 August 2011.
25- VAN Tatenhove, J; Edelenbos, J & Jan klok, P. (2010). POWER AND INTERACTIVE POLICY-MAKING: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF POWER AND INFLUENCE IN 8 INTERACTIVE PROJECTS IN THE NETHERLANDS. The Authors. Public Administration © 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.