The Role of “Petition Box” in Pre-modern Japanese Policy

Document Type : Research Article

Author

Ph. D. of Area and Culture Studies, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies

Abstract

Faced with the crises Tokugawa rulers in Japan instituted a chain of reforms tactically and strategically to prevent the collapse of shogunate system. Guaranteeing the direct appeals (complaint, criticism and suggestion) by the inferiors to the superiors via the “petition box” in order to eradicate the official’s corruption and garnering information from society were amongst these reforms. The prevailing inertia of the government policy and bureaucracy which was a monopoly of samurai class made the rulers resort for public participation and the wisdom of the crowd by receiving useful criticisms and suggestions via the box. High rate of literacy and public awareness resulted in offering fine ideas and promotion of brilliant talents in bureaucratic system and adoption of proper policies. The spirit and essence of the box was also transferred in transition of Japanese society to modern era due to historical continuation and paved the way for the adoption of modern institutions such as parliament.

Keywords

References

1-  “Yamashita Kȏnai jȏsho,” in Kokushi dai jiten http://www.japanknowledge.com/body/display/ accessed 7 June (2013).
2- (1994). kyȗji shimon roku: Edo bakufu no shȏgen. (jȏ). Tȏkyȏ: Iwanami shȏten.
3- Cogan, A., Sharpe, S. & J. Hertzberg (1986). “Citizen Participation.” in So., F.S. Hand, I., & B.D. Madowell (Eds). The Practice of State and Regional Planning. Municipal Management Series. Chicago: American Planning Association.
4- Dore, Ronald Philip (1965). “Education in Tokugawa Japan”, University of California Press.
5- Fujita, Satoru (2002-3). kinsei no san dai kaikaku, Nihonshi Riburetto Vol. 48, Tokyo: Yamakawa.
6- Fukaya, Katsumi (1999). “kinsei seiji to hyakushȏ meyasu” in Kȏtaro Iwata & Katsumi Fukaya, eds., shakai ishiki to sekai zȏ, (minshȗ undȏshi: kinsei kara kindai e, series Vol. 2, by Katsu hiro Arai) Tȏkyȏ: Aoki shoten.
7- Harafuji, Hiroshi (1992). “meyasubako.” P. 776 in Kokushi Daijiten (Great Dictionary of National History), Dai 13 shȏ (Vol. 13), ed. Kokushi Daijiten henshȗ iinkai, 1979 – 1997. Tȏkyȏ: Yoshikawa Kabunkan.
8- Hirakawa, Arata (1996). Funso to seron: kinsei minshû no seiji sanka. Todai Shuppnkai.
9- Kasaya, Kazuhiko (2000). The Origin and Development of Japanese-style Organization. translated by Eric C. Rath. Kyoto: International Research Center for Japanese Studies.
10- Kenjȏ, Yukyo (1979). “Edo bakufu meyasubako he no ichi sojȏ.” Toki no Hȏrei, (chȗ) 1032: 22-31.
11- Kenjȏ, Yukyo (1979). “Edo bakufu meyasubako he no ichi sojȏ.” Toki no Hȏrei, (ge no 2) 1049: 44-50.
12- Kweit, M.G. & Kweit, R.W. (1981). Implementing Citizen Participation in a Bureaucratic Society. Praeger, New York.
13- Mochizuki, Yoshichika (2008) (Heisei 20). “「sojȏdome」ni miru no jikiso” in Ieyasu. Yoshimune. Ietatsu-tenkaki no Tokugawake (Unification, Reform and Westernization: transitional moments in Japanese history and the Tokugawa Shogunal Household). Edited and published by zaidan hȏjin Tokugawa kinen zaidan.
14- OECD (2005), Evaluating Public Participation in Policy Making, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264008960-en
15- Ȏhira, Yȗichi (1995). “(shiryȏ) Meiji shoki Kyȏto meyasubako sojȏ- 「hakoso kenetsu roku」.” Ritsumeikan Law Review (International Ed.) 238 (2): 118-210.
16- Ȏhira, Yȗichi (2003). Meyasubako no kenkyȗ, Ritsumeikan Daigaku Hogakubu sosho, Tokyo: Sobunsha.
17- Ȏishi, Manabu (2003). “Kyȏhȏ kaikaku to shakai henyȏ,” in Manabu Ȏishi Nihon no jidaishi Vol. 16, Tȏkyȏ: Yoshikawa Kobunkan.
18- Ȏishi, Shinzaburȏ (1996). “Bakuhan taisei no tenkai to dȏyȏ” in Kodam Kȏta, Nihon rekishi taikei fukyȗban 10, Tȏkyȏ: Yamakawa Shuppansha.
19- Roberts, Luke S (1994). “The Petition Box in Eighteenth – Century Tosa.” The Seciety for Japanese Studies 20(2): 423 – 458.
20- Roberts, Luke S (1997). “A Petition for a Popularly Chosen Council of Government in Tosa in 1787.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 57(2): 575-596.
21- Roberts, Luke S (1998). Mercantilism in a Japanese domain: The merchant origins of economic nationalism in 18th – century Tosa. Cambridge University Press.
22- Schneider, Irene (2006). The Petitioning System in Iran: State, Society and Power Relations in the late 19th century. Wiesbaden: Harrasowitz.
23- Wakao, Masaki (2003). “Kyȏhȏ Tenmeiki no shakai to bunka,” in Manabu Ȏishi, Nihon no jidaishi Vol. 16, Tȏkyȏ: Yoshikawa Kobunkan.
24- Yokota, Fuyuhiko (2005). “kinsei no gakugei,” in Osamu Ȏtȏ and others, eds., kinsei shakairon, nihonshi kȏza, Vol. 6, rekishigaku kenkyȗkai and nihonshi kenkyȗkai, Tȏkyȏ: Tȏdai Shuppankai.
Yoshinaga, Guzan (1954) (Showa 29). Kȏsatsu. Meyasubako 2nd edition. Mojikyodo sȏsho dai 1. Mojikyodokai
Iranian Journal of Public Policy
Volume 3, Issue 3 - Serial Number 3
December 2017
Pages 79-101

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics