Developing a Model to Measure the Cohesion of Policies in the Science, Research and Technology Area in Iran

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Assistant Prof. of Public Adminstration, Tehran University

2 Ph.D student in Public Adminstration, Tarbiyat Modares University

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the article1of the law of objectives, functions and structure of the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology and study cohesion of science, research and technology policies since 1383. To this aim, coherence and alignment of policies at two levels (vertical integration and horizontal integration) has been considered based on content analysis and documentation of four components (policy objectives, policy tools, institutions and enforcement authority) has been conducted. The results of the analysis documentation show that coherence between policies, both vertically (31.22 percent) or horizontal (between mega policies, 25%) is not desirable.

Keywords

References

الف) فارسی
1-       احمدی، هانیه. (1390)، فهم دلایل عدم انسجام (ناهمسویی) خط‌‌مشی‌های عمومی در ایران، پایان‌نامه مقطع کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس.
2-       عباسی، طیبه، بیگی، وحید. (1395)، تبیین چالش‌های اجرای خط‌‌مشی‌های عمومی در حوزه علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری، سیاست علم و فناوری، دوره 8، ش 3، ص 13-1.
3-       عطاردی، محمدرضا. (1392)، مفهوم‌پردازی پدیده شکاف خط‌مشی در فرآیند خط‌مشی‌گذاری فرهنگی، رساله دکتری، دانشگاه امام صادق (ع).
4-       علیزاده، پریسا. (1394)، نقش فناوری در توسعه اقتصادی و الزامات سیاستگذاری برای آن، مرکز پژوهش‌های مجلس، دفتر مطالعات ارتباطات و فناوری‌های نوین.
5-       قلی‌پور، رحمت‌اله، دانایی‌فرد، حسن، امیری، علینقی، عطاردی محمدرضا. (1394)، مفهوم‌پردازی پدیده شکاف خط‌مشی در فرآیند خط‌مشی‌گذاری فرهنگی، دوره  22، ش 81، ش 125-91.
6-     مقدس‌پور، سعید، دانایی‌فرد، حسن، کردنائیچ، اسدالله. (1392)، واکاوی عوامل کلیدی در عدم موفقیت برخی خط‌‌مشی‌های عمومی در جمهوری اسلامی ایران: مطالعه خط‌‌مشی‌های مالیاتی کشور، مدیریت فرهنگ سازمانی، دوره 11، ش 1، ص 68-33.
7-     نوروز زاده، رضا، فتحی واجارگاه، کورش، کیذوری، امیرحسین. (1388)، تحلیل محتوایی اسناد فرادستی و معین به منظور استنتاج سیاست‌های برنامه‌های توسعه پنجم بخش آموزش عالی، تحقیقات و فناوری، پژوهش و برنامه‌ریزی در آموزش عالی، ش 53، ص 50-29.
ب) انگلیسی
8- Acheampong, R. A., & Ibrahim, A. (2016), One Nation, Two Planning Systems? Spatial Planning and Multi-Level Policy Integration in Ghana: Mechanisms, Challenges and the Way Forward. Urban Forum, 27(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12132-015-9269-1.
9- Ashoff, G. (2005), Enhancing Policy Coherence for Development: Justification, Recognition and Approaches to Achievement. Bonn: The German Development Institute.
10- Barry, F., King, M., & Matthews, A. (2010), Policy Coherence for Development: Five Challenges. Irish Studies in International Affairs, 21(207–223).
11- Bass, S., & Dalal-Clayton, B. (2012), Sustainable Development Strategies: A Resource Book. London & Sterling, VA: Routledge.
12- Bowen, G. A. (2009), Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
13- Carbone, M. (2008), Mission Impossible: the European Union and Policy Coherence for Development. Journal of European Integration, 30(3), 323–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036330802144992.
14- Carbone, M., & Keijzer, N. (2016), The European Union and Policy Coherence for Development: Reforms, Results, Resistance. The European Journal of Development Research, 28(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2015.72.
15- Christiansen, T. (2001), Intra-institutional politics and inter-institutional relations in the EU: towards coherent governance? Journal of European Public Policy, 8(5), 747–769. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760110083491.
16- Dayton-johnson, J., & Katseli, L. T. (2006), Migration, Aid and Trade: Policy Coherence for Development. Policy Brief No. 28.
17- Di Francesco, M. (2001), Process not outcomes in new public management? Policy coherence in Australian government. The Drawing Board: An Australian Review of Public Affairs, 1(3), 103–116. Retrieved from http://www.australianreview.net/journal/v1/n3/difrancesco.pdf
18- Duraiappah, A. K., & Bhardwaj, A. (2007), Measuring Policy Coherence among the MEAs and MDGs. Winnipeg, Manitoba: International Institute for Sustainable Development.
19- Fujita, K. (2003), Neo-industrial Tokyo: Urban Development and Globalisation in Japan’s State-centred Developmental Capitalism. Urban Studies, 40(2), 249–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980220080271.
20- Huttunen, S., Kivimaa, P., & Virkamäki, V. (2014), The need for policy coherence to trigger a transition to biogas production. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 12, 14–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2014.04.002.
21- Hyden, G. (1999), The Shifting Grounds of Policy Coherence in Development. In J. Forster & O. S. Stokke (Eds.), Policy Coherence in Development Co-operation (pp. 58–77), London: Frank Cass.
22- May, P. J., Sapotichne, J., & Workman, S. (2006), Policy Coherence and Policy Domains. Policy Studies Journal, 34(3), 381–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2006.00178.x.
23- Mcconnell, A. (2010), Policy Success, Policy Failure and Grey Areas In-Between. Journal of Public Policy, 30(3), 345–362. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X10000152.
24- Oberthür, S., & Gehring, T. (2006), Institutional Interaction in Global Environmental Governance: The Case of the Cartagena Protocol and the World Trade Organization. Global Environmental Politics, 6(2), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2006.6.2.1.
25- OECD. (2003), Policy coherence: Vital for global development. Policy Brief. Paris. Retrieved from k:%5CX%5CLiteratur%5C_Lit InnoTRANS%5CMutterdatenbank_Citavi5%5CMutterdatenbank%5CCitavi Attachments%5COECD 2003_policy coherence.pdf.
26- OECD. (2012), Policy Framework for Policy Coherence for Development (Vol. 1), Paris. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pcd/50461952.pdf.
27- Prontera, A. (2016), Subsystem politics and policy coherence in development cooperation: Evidence from four EU Member States. Comparative European Politics, 14(3), 298–318. https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2014.30
28- Sianes, A. (2013), Shedding Light on Policy Coherence for Development: a Conceptual Framework. Journal of International Development, n/a-n/a. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.2977.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics