Identify and Prioritize the Challenges of Achieving the Open Government Data Policy (OGDP): Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process and Fuzzy TOPSIS

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Prof. of Public Administration, Tehran University

2 Ph.D. student in science and technology policy, Tehran University

3 M.S in Islamic Studies and Management, Imam Sadiq University

Abstract

Government open data has a new issue on the agenda of international organizations and development governments. Government open data policy is a set of actions that the government should do to comply with the confidentiality provided public access to data and policy information that the people and the elites have participated in policy making and Supervision. This research tries using mixed methods research to identify and prioritize policy challenges of open government data. First, the qualitative phase, literature review were identified open data policy challenges and experiences of other countries. After meeting with focus groups composed of some researchers, policy makers and people involved in the field of open data, this challenge was determined in accordance with the conditions of the country and its ecosystem. In the quantitative phase with using analysis hierarchical Fuzzy and Fuzzy TOPSIS were ranking challenges by the experts. At the end, based on the priority challenges identified, fundamental challenges to realize open government data and presented some solutions and policy recommendations.

Keywords

References

الف) فارسی
1- عبدالحسین زاده، محمد؛ ثنایی، مهدی؛ ذوالفقارزاده، محمد مهدی. (1396)، مفهوم‌شناسی سیاستگذاری داده باز حاکمیتی و تبیین مزایا و فواید آن در عرصه‌های مختلف سیاستگذاری، فصلنامه مطالعات راهبردی سیاستگذاری عمومی، دوره 7، ش 22، ص 55-74.
ب) انگلیسی
2- Abduaziz, A. A., Akmal, A. V., & Nurbek, B. N. (July 01, 2015), E-Government, Open Data, and Security: Overcoming Information Security Issues with Open Data. Computer Science and Information Technology, 3(4), 133-137
3- Birkinshaw, Patrick. (2010), Freedom of Information 4ed. Cambridge University Press.
4- Chang, D.Y. (1992), Extent Analysis and Synthetic Decision, Optimization Techniques and Applications, World Scientific, Singapore, 1: 352.
5- Chapman, R. A., & Hunt, M. (2006), Open government in a theoretical and practical context. Aldershot, Hants, England: Ashgate.
6- Corbetta, P. (2003), Social Research; Theory, Methods and Techniques, Sage Pub, London
7- Creswell, J., W. and V. L Plano Clark. (2007), Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, London: Sage Publication Inc
8- European Commission. (2012, December) Directive 2003/98/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 17 November 2003 on the re-use of public sector information. European Commission.
9- European Data Portal (2015): Creating Value through Open Data. Study on the Impact of Re-use of Public Data Resources. Available online at: http://www.europeandataportal.eu/en/ content/creating-value-through-open-data.
10- Ganapati, S., & Reddick, C. G. (April 01, 2012), Open e-government in U.S. state governments: Survey evidence from Chief Information Officers. Government Information Quarterly, 29, 2, 115-122.
11- Geiger CP, von Lucke J. (2012), Open government and (linked)(open)(government)(data), JeDEM-eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government, 4 (2), 78-265.
12- Gurin J. (2014), Open data now: the secret to hot startups, smart investing, savvy marketing, and fast innovation: McGraw Hill Education.
13- Harrison, T. M., Guerrero, S., Burke, G. B., Cook, M., Cresswell, A. (October 25, 2011), Open government and e-government: Democratic challenges from a public value perspective. Acm International Conference Proceeding Series, 245-253.
14- Janssen, K. (January 01, 2011), The influence of the PSI directive on open government data: An overview of recent developments. Government Information Quarterly, 28, 4, 446-456.
15- Kitzinger, J., Barbour, R.S. (1999), Introduction: the challenge and promise of focus groups. In: Barbour, R.S., Kitzinger, J. (Eds.), Developing Focus Group Research. Sage Pub, London
16- Lövnord,Alexander. (2014), Barriers when adopting, implementing, and innovating open data in local municipal organizations, Department of informatics, Master of IT Mangement.
17- M. Janssen, Y. Charalabidis & A. Zuiderwijk. (2012), Benefits, Adoption, Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government. Information Systems Management (ISM), vol. 29, no.4, pp. 258-268.
18- McKinsey Global Institute. (2013), Open data: Unlocking innovation and performance with liquid information
19- Open Knowledge International. (2015), Open Definition version 2.0. [Accessed: 1395/08/23] Retrieved from http://opendefinition.org/od/
20- Tashakkori, A., and C. Teddlie. (2003), "Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research", First Edition, Sage Publication Inc
21- Ubaldi, B. (2013), “Open Government Data: Towards Empirical Analysis of Open Government Data Initiatives”, OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, No. 22, OECD Publishing
22- United Nations. (2013), Guidelines on Open Government Data for Citizen Engagement. Retrieved from http://www.unpan.org/DPADM/EGovernment/OpenGovernmentData andServices/tabid/1536/language/en-US/Default.aspx
23- UNPAN. (2015), The context: e-Government, Open Government, Open Data. United Nations Public Administration department.
24- Whitmore, A. (April 01, 2012), Extracting knowledge from U.S. department of defense freedom of information act requests with social media. Government Information Quarterly, 29, 2, 151-157.
25- World Bank. (2016), Open Government Data Toolkit. From: opendatatoolkit.worldbank.org
26- Worthy, B. E. N. (October 01, 2010), More Open but Not More Trusted? The Effect of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 on the United Kingdom Central Government. Governance, 23, 4, 561-582.
27- Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M. (2013), A coordination theory perspective to improve the use of open data in policymaking. in Proceeding 12th Conference on Electronic Government (EGOV), Koblenz, Germany,pp.38–49
28- Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M. (2014), Open data policies, their implementation and impact: A framework for comparison. In Government Information Quarterly 31, pp. 17–29
29- Zuiderwijk, A.M.G., Helbig, N., Gil-García, J.R., & Janssen, M.F.W.H.A. (2014), Special Issue on Innovation through Open Data: A Review of the State-of-the-Art and an Emerging Research Agenda: Guest Editors’ Introduction, (Article.) University of Talca, Faculty of Engineering.
30- Zuiderwijk, Janssen M., Choenni S., Meijer R., Sheikh Alibaks R. (2012), Socio-technical impediments of open data, Electronic Journal of eGovernment, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 156 – 172.
Iranian Journal of Public Policy
Volume 3, Issue 2 - Serial Number 2
September 2017
Pages 57-89

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics