An Innovation Survey Framework in Nanotechnology: Iran's Nanotechnology as Case Study

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

Abstract

Keeping in mind the importance of evaluating technological change, the present study tries to introduce a structure to survey nanotechnology innovation in Iran. for each of the five domains of “future strategy document of Iran’s Nanotechnology”, including promotion, infrastructure, the progressive of science and technology, technology transfer and distribution and the production and market, indicator was defined. Afterward, Indicators of each field using a matrix of attractiveness-feasibility with respect to the importance and feasibility ratings and and the four classes were introduced. In conclusion, with respect to the development of nanotechnology in Iran, appropriate strategies for using the indicators (such as considering class an indicators as main indicators and preferable and use from class C indicators a complementary) are introduced. 

Keywords

References

1- حسین رضاعلیزاده ولوکلایی (1387)‌ چارچوب سنجش نوآوری (نانوتکنولوژی به عنوان مورد)، کارشناسی ارشد، دانشکده  مدیریت و حسابداری علامه طباطبائی.
2- سید کامران باقری (1381)‌ سنجش R&D یا نوآوری، ضرورت سنجش نوآوری و پوشش فعالیتهای طراحی و مهندسی در ایران، دومین همایش روشهای تحقیق در علوم و فنون مهندسی، دانشگاه امام حسین.
3- ستاد ویژه  توسعه  فناوری نانو (1384)‌ سند تکمیلی راهبرد آینده: 10 ساله توسعه فناوری نانودر جمهوری اسلامی ایران1393-1384.
4- ستاد ویژه  توسعه  فناوری نانو (1389)‌ گزارش عملکرد سال 1389 نانوفناوری کشور.
5- Arvhibugi، D.، Pianta، M. (1996) “Measuring Technology Chang Through Patents and Innovation Survey”, Technovation، 16(9)، 451-468.
6- Arvhibugi، D. Siilli، G. (2000) “The Direct Measurement of Technological Innovation in Business”, National Research Council، Rome Italy.
7- Carlsson، B. Jacobsson، S, Holmen، M. Rickne، A. (2002) “Innovation Systems: Analytical and Methodological Issues”, Research Policy، 31، 233- 245.
8- Cyhn، Jin، W. (2002) “Technology Transfer and International Production”, (PP. 10-70). Edward Elgar Pulishing.Inc.
9- Innovation Union Scoreboard (2011) Innovation Union Scoreboard 2010، Innovation Union's performance scoreboard for Research and Innovation، Maastricht Economic and social Research and training centre on Innovation and Technology (UNU-MERIT) with the contribution of DG JRC G3 of the European Commission.
10- Godinho M. Mendonca S. Pereira T. (2003) Mapping Innovation System: A Framwork Based on Innovation Data and Indicators, International Workshop on Empirical Studies on Innovation in Europe.
11- Klomp، L. (2001) Measuring Output From R&D Activities in Innovation Surveys. Paper Prepared for the ISI 53 Conference، Seoul، Korea.
12- Liue، X. White، S. (2001). Comparing Innovation Systems: a Framework and Application to China`s Transitional Context. Research Policy، 30، 1091-1114.
13- Nasierowski W. Arcelus F.J، (1999). Interrelationship among the Elements of National Innovation System: a Statistical Evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research، 37، 235-253.
14- Nasierowski W. Arcelus F.J. (2003) “On the Efficiency of National Innovation System”, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences، 37، 215-234.
15- OECD (2011) Science، Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2011: Innovation and Growth in Knowledge Economies
16- OECD (2005) Oslo Manual Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, Third edition.
17- OECD (2002) Frascati Manual: Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Development. Paris.
18- Porter، M. Stern، S. Furman، JL. (2002) “The Determinants of National Innovation Capacity”, Research Policy، 31، 899-933.
19- United Nation (2003)، New Indicators for Science، Technology and Innovation in the Knowledge-Based Society، Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics