1. Agarwal, A., & Nene, M. J. (2025). A five-layer framework for AI governance: Integrating regulation, standards, and certification. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 19(3), 535–555.
https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-03-2025-0065.
2. Aguilar, R. M., Alayón, S., Torres, J. M., & Martín, C. A. (2026). Data-centric AI governance for responsible organizational value: Evidence from a European public administration. AI & Society.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-026-02978-y.
3. Akbari, K. (2025). From politics to public policy: The relationship between the political sphere and the rationality of public decision-making in Iran. Journal of Public Policy Studies, 5(2), 1–27.
https://sanad.iau.ir/Journal/jrpp/Article/1231818 [In Persian].
4. Amirzadeh, M. R., Pirani, S., & Ashtarian, K. (2026). New technologies and the transformation of the state. Journal of Political Quarterly, 56(1), 29-56. https://doi.org/10.22059/jpq.2026.388566.1008275.
5. Batool, A., Zowghi, D., & Bano, M. (2025). AI governance: A systematic literature review. AI and Ethics, 5, 3265–3279.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-024-00653-w.
6. Carvalho, L. L. D., Buchbinder, F., Da Hora, D. A. B., Ferreira, V. B., et al. (2026). Social participation as an ethical criterion for AI governance in public administration. AI and Ethics.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-026-01010-9.
7. Dorakhshah, Jalal, & Golshahi, Mohammad Mehdi. (2025). Internet and technogeopolitics: Governance patterns and processes. Politics Quarterly, 55(1), 87–123.
https://doi.org/10.22059/jpq.2025.385491.1008247
8. Engin, Z., Crowcroft, J., Hand, D. J., & Treleaven, P. (2025). The Algorithmic State Architecture (ASA): An Integrated Framework for AI-Enabled Government. arXiv Preprint.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.08725.
9. Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Luetge, C., Madelin, R., Pagallo, U., Rossi, F., Schafer, B., Valcke, P., & Vayena, E. (2018). AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689–707.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5.
10. Freitas, J. G. D. (2026). The challenges of AI regulation: Data protection, civil rights, and landmark cases. Frontiers in Political Science, 8, 1626848. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2026.1626848.
11. Gonzalez Torres, A. P., & Ali-Vehmas, T. (2025). AI regulation: Maintaining interoperability through value-sensitive standardisation. Ethics and Information Technology, 27(2), Article 26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-025-09832-7
12. Gunningham, N., & Grabosky, P. (1998). Smart Regulation: Designing Environmental Policy. Oxford University Press.
13. Hammerschmidt, T., Stolz, K., & Posegga, O. (2025). Bridging the gap: inequalities that divide those who can and cannot create sustainable outcomes with AI. Behaviour & Information Technology.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2025.2500451
14. Information Technology Organization of Iran. (2023). Policy report on digital transformation and smart government in Iran. Tehran, Iran. [In Persian].
15. Iranian Parliament Research Center. (2023). Requirements for artificial intelligence governance and regulation in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Tehran, Iran: Iranian Parliament Research Center. [In Persian].
16. Iranian Parliament Research Center. (2025). Artificial intelligence regulation and governance in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Tehran, Iran. [In Persian].
17. Janowski, T. (2015). Digital Government Evolution: From Transformation to Contextualization. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 221–236.
18. Janowski, T., Estevez, E., & Baguma, R. (2018). Platform governance for sustainable development: Reshaping citizen–administration relationships in the digital age. Government Information Quarterly, 35(4), S1–S16.
19. Janssen, M. (2025). Responsible governance of generative AI: Conceptualizing GenAI as complex adaptive systems. Policy and Society, 44(1), 38–51. https://doi.org/10.1093/polsoc/puae040
20. Kanaani, F., Rasoulian, P., Hafezi, R., & Ahangari, S. S. (2023). Analysis of Iran’s artificial intelligence ecosystem and identification of its institutional and functional gaps. Science and Technology Policy Journal, 16(2), 59–77. [In Persian].
21. Maheshwari, N., Mohan, G., & Mishra, D. (2025). Digital transformation in governance: Preconditions for achieving good governance. Public Policy and Administration. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767251355715
22. Marchiori, S., Hopster, J. K. G., Puzio, A., van Riemsdijk, M. B., Kraaijeveld, S. R., Lundgren, B., Viehoff, J., & Frank, L. E. (2025). A social disruptiveness-based approach to AI governance: Complementing the risk-based approach of the AI Act. Science and Engineering Ethics, 31(5), Article 25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-025-00545-0
23. Maslej, N., Aguilar, G., Fattorini, L., et al. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Index Report 2024. Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence.
24. Mazzucato, M. (2025). The Entrepreneurial State in the Age of Artificial Intelligence and Mission-Oriented Innovation. London: UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose.
25. Mišić, J., van Est, R., & Kool, L. (2025). Good governance of public sector AI: A combined value framework for good order and a good society. AI and Ethics, 5, 4875–4889.
26. Moore, M. H. (2025). Creating Public Value in the Digital Age: Governance, Innovation and Public Leadership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Kennedy School Press.
27. Mossalanejad, A. (2025). Governance and economic policymaking in the artificial intelligence era. Politics Quarterly, 55(3), 807–841.
https://doi.org/10.22059/jpq.2025.392186.1008322
28. Mulgan, G. (2025). When Science Meets Power: Innovation, Networks and the Future of Public Governance. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
29. National Artificial Intelligence Organization. (2024). Statute and missions of the National Artificial Intelligence Organization. Tehran, Iran. [In Persian].
30. National Artificial Intelligence Organization. (2025). Performance report and national artificial intelligence development program. Tehran, Iran. [In Persian].
31. Nikiforova, A., Lněnička, M., Melin, U., Valle-Cruz, D., Gill, A., Casiano Flores, C., Sirait, E., Luterek, M., Dreyling, R. M., & Tesařová, B. (2025). Responsible AI Adoption in the Public Sector: A Data-Centric Taxonomy of AI Adoption Challenges. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.09634.
32. Novelli, C., Hacker, P., Morley, J., Trondal, J., & Floridi, L. (2024). A Robust Governance for the AI Act: AI Office, AI Board, Scientific Panel, and National Authorities. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.10369
33. OECD & UNESCO. (2024). G7 Toolkit for Artificial Intelligence in the Public Sector. Paris: OECD Publishing.
34. OECD. (2024). Framework for Anticipatory Governance of Emerging Technologies. Paris: OECD Publishing.
35. OECD. (2024). Governing with Artificial Intelligence: Are Governments Ready? Paris: OECD Publishing.
36. OECD. (2025). Artificial Intelligence, Public Governance and Regulatory Capacity. Paris: OECD Publishing.
37. Papagiannidis, E., Mikalef, P., & Conboy, K. (2025). Responsible artificial intelligence governance: A review and research framework. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 34(2), 101885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2024.101885.
38. Pasetti, M., Santos, J. W., & Corrêa, N. K. (2025). Technical, legal, and ethical challenges of generative artificial intelligence: An analysis of the governance of training data and copyrights. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 5, 193.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-025-00379-6.
39. Pavlidis, G., & Kastanas, I. (2026). Algorithmic Administration and the EU AI Act: Legal Principles for Public Sector Use of AI. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.22765.
40. Pi, Y., Turkay, C., & Bogiatzis-Gibbons, D. (2025). Interactive AI and Human Behavior: Challenges and Pathways for AI Governance. Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, 8(3), 2016–2029.
https://doi.org/10.1609/aies.v8i3.36692.
41. Rammach, N., & Slamti, H. (2026). Legal and regulatory challenges in AI-driven decision-making systems: Implications for accountability and governance. Russian Law Journal, 14(1). Published January 12, 2026. Available at: Russian Law Journal Article Page.
42. Sarliève, P., Drummond, J., King, B., Cohen, N., & Pietikäinen, A. (2025). A mapping tool for digital regulatory frameworks: Including a pilot on efforts to regulate AI (OECD Regulatory Policy Working Papers No. 23). OECD Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.1787/1cdad902-en.
43. Shen, X., & Gao, L. (2026). Ethical AI governance: AI for society and a co-learning approach. Global Transitions, 8(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/20966083251336553.
44. Subías-Beltrán, P., Unceta, I., de Lecuona, I., et al. (2026). Asking the right questions: A governance approach to uphold human autonomy in artificial intelligence. AI & Society, 41, 1149–1173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02611-4.
45. Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution. (2024). National Artificial Intelligence Document of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Tehran, Iran. [In Persian].
46. UNESCO. (2024). Re-engineering the Systems for Effective Governance of Artificial Intelligence. Paris: UNESCO.
47. Wirtz, B. W., Weyerer, J. C., & Geyer, C. (2020). Artificial Intelligence and the Public Sector—Applications and Challenges. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(7), 596–615.
48. World Economic Forum. (2024). Blueprint for Intelligent Economies: AI Competitiveness through Regional Collaboration. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
49. Yeung, K. (2018). Algorithmic Regulation: A Critical Interrogation. Regulation & Governance, 12(4), 505–523.
50. Zeng, Y., Lu, E., Guo, X., Huangfu, C., Xie, J., Chen, Y., Wang, Z., Liang, D., Cao, G., Wang, J., Ruan, Z., Guan, X., & Younas, A. (2025). AI Governance International Evaluation Index (AGILE Index) 2025. Center for Long-term Artificial Intelligence (CLAI); Beijing Institute of AI Safety and Governance (Beijing-AISI); Beijing Key Laboratory of Safe AI and Superalignment; International Research Center for AI Ethics and Governance, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences. arXiv.
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.11546.
51. Zhang, S., & Maharjan, S. (2026). Security, privacy, and agentic AI in a regulatory view: From definitions and distinctions to provisions and reflections. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.18914.
