The Laboratory of the Future; A New Paradigm in Future-based Governance

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

PhD Student of Futures Studies, Faculty of Strategic Management, University of Supreme National Defense, Tehran, Iran

10.22059/jppolicy.2025.102504

Abstract

In today's complex and rapidly changing world, policymakers at all governmental levels face numerous challenges and uncertainties. This has underscored the need for innovative approaches to policymaking. This article introduces the "future laboratory" as a novel model within the framework of future-based governance to address these challenges effectively. Employing descriptive-analytical and future wheel methodologies, this study outlines the key components of a future laboratory, including: exploring, analyzing, and creating future images; testing policies in multiple scenarios; and proposing solutions grounded in future-oriented processes. The future laboratory is a simulated environment that empowers decision-makers and policymakers to visualize alternative futures, experiment with policies and programs under various scenarios, and assess their potential outcomes. By leveraging advanced tools such as simulation, modeling, and data analysis, this platform offers a comprehensive and dynamic view of possible futures, guiding informed decision-making.

Keywords

References

  1. Arslan, S.C. (2023). Transdisciplinary Research Using the Example of the “Media Future Lab” Project. In: Franz, HW. Beck, G. Compagna, D. Dürr, P. Gehra, W. Wegner, M. (eds). Sustainable Living & Business. Springer, Wiesbaden.
  2. Bailey, J. & Lloyd, P. (2016). The introduction of design to policymaking: Policy Lab and the UK government. In P. Lloyd & E. Bohemia (Eds.), Proceedings of DRS design research society. (pp.3619–3634). Brighton: Design Research Society.
  3. Bengston, David N. (2016). The Futures Wheel: A Method for Exploring theImplications of Social–Ecological Change, Society & Natural Resources, 29:3, 374-379.
  4. Collins, T., & Hines, A. (2010). The Evolution of Integral Futures. World Futures Review, 2(3), 5-16.
  5. Corrado Trombetta, Martino Milardi. (2015). BUILDING FUTURE Lab.: A Great Infrastructure for Testing, Energy Procedia, 78, 657-662.
  6. Damgaard, B. and J. M. Lewis. (2014). Accountability and Citizen Participation. In The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability, edited by M. Bovens, R. Goodin, and T. Schillemans, 258–272. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  7. (2001). A practical guide to regional foresight. Seville, Spain: IPTS.
  8. Fuller, M. & Lochard, A. (2016). Public policy labs in European union member states. Luxemburg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  9. Godet, Michel. & Durance, Philippe. (2008). La Prospective stratégique, pour les entreprises et les territoires. Paris, Dunod, collection «Topos«+.governance (pp. 149–157). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  10. Hideg, É. (2013). Integral futures based on the paradigm approach. Futures, 45.
  11. Hines, A. (2006). Strategic foresight: The state of the art. Futurist, 40(5), 18–21.
  12. Huskins, Brian, Nunes, Erica. (2017). NFP Governance Leadership: Creating a Culture of Accessibility. Institude on Governance, Ontario.
  13. Kapoko, Naim. (2024). Network governance: concepts, theories and applications. Translated by Mehdi Rahimi Gilani and Akram Nouri, Tehran: Research Institute of Islamic Culture and Thought. [In Persian]
  14. Kenis, P. (2016). Network. In C. Ansell & J. Torfing (Eds.), Handbook on theories of governance (pp. 149–157). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  15. Kuosa, T. (2012). The Evolution of Strategic Foresight: Navigating Public Policy Making. Oxfordshire: Routledge.
  16. Leuba, James H.; McDougall, William. (1990). "An Introduction to Social Psychology". The American Journal of Psychology. 20 (2): 285.
  17. Lewis, J. M. (2020). The limits of policy labs: characteristics, opportunities and constraints. Policy Design and Practice, 4(2), 242–251.
  18. Lewis, J. M. M. McGann, and E. Blomkamp. (2020). “When Design Meets Power: Design Thinking, Public Sector Innovation and the Politics of Policymaking.” Policy & Politics. 48(1): 111–130.
  19. Mintrom, M. & Luetjens, J. (2016). Design thinking in policymaking processes: Opportunities and challenges. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 75(3), 391–402.
  20. Nyiri, Lajos. (2003). Foresight as a Policy-making Tool. Technology Foresight for Organizers, Ankara, Turkey.
  21. Panahi, Faezeh and Ghasemi, Mohammad Hadi. (2024). Designing the process of policy laboratories with a strategic foresight approach. Scientific Research Quarterly of Science and Technology Policy, 17 (61): 19-38. [In Persian]
  22. Pink, Daniel. (2011). A whole new mind. Translation: Reza Amirrahimi, Tehran: Kendokav Publishing. [In Persian]
  23. Price, A. (2015). World of labs, London: Nesta, www.nesta.org.uk/blog/world-labs.
  24. Rohrbeck, R, (2007) Technology Scouting - a case study on the Deutsche Telekom Laboratories. ISPIM-Asia Conference; New Delhi, India.
  25. Sardar, Ziauddin. (2017). The future is all that matters. Translator: Mohsen Taheri Demeneh. Tehran: Aindeh Pajoh Publication. [In Persian]
  26. Slaughter, R. A. (1998). Futures Studies as an Intellectual and Applied Discipline. American Behavioral Scientist, 42(3), 372- 385.
  27. Slaughter, R. A. (1999). A new framework for environmental scanning. Foresight, 1(5), 441-451.
  28. Slaughter, R. A. (2001). Knowledge creation, futures methodologies and the integral agenda. Foresight, 3(5), 407-418.
  29. Slaughter, R. A. (2003). Futures Beyond Dystopia. Routledge Falmer, London.
  30. Slaughter, R. A. (2008). What difference does ‘integral’ make? Futures, 40(2), 120-137.
  31. Slaughter, R. A. (2012). To see with fresh eyes: Integral futures and the global emergency. Indooroopilly, Qld.: Foresight.
  32. Slaughter, R.A. (2002). Futures studies as an intellectual and applied discipline, American Behavioral Scientist. 42 (3) 372–385.
  33. Slaughter, Richard A. Bussey, Marcus (2006). Futures thinking for social foresight. Tamkang University Press.
  34. Tõnurist, P. Kattel, R. and Lember V. (2017). Innovation labs in the public sector: what they are and what they do? Public Management Review, 19(10): 1455–79.
  35. United Nations Evaluation Group. (2013). International year of evaluation.
  36. Voros, J. (2008). Integral Futures: An approach to futures inquiry. Futures, 40(2), 190-201.
  37. Wilber, K. (2007). The Integral Vision: A Very Short Introduction to the Revolutionary Integral Approach to Life, God, the Universe, and Everything. Shambala Publications. Boston, USA.
Iranian Journal of Public Policy
Volume 11, Issue 2
June 2025
Pages 9-28

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics