Communitarian Policymaking and Balance in the Fourth Industrial Revolution

Document Type : Research Article

Author

Distinguished Professor of Political Science, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

In the course of any historical era, policymaking is governed by social, technological and developmentalist formations. As science and technology face paradigmatic changes during different historical eras, public and strategic policymaking is on the threshold of entering a new technological order influenced by such issues as balance, equilibrium and software act. Whenever the technological revolution emerges, the nature and public policies of the government undergo fundamental changes. The main question raised by the present paper is, “What are the signs and functions of policymaking in the Fourth Industrial Revolution?” The hypothesis of this paper emphasizes that “policymaking of the Fourth Industrial Revolution adopts a software, communitarian, balancing and equilibrium making approach toward managing newly emerging crises.” Each of the foregoing concepts and signs is considered as part of the nature and function of policymaking in the emerging technological era. The data analysis and content analysis methodology was used in compiling this paper. For the purpose of delineating the policymaking indices in the Fourth Industrial Revolution, the author benefited from the “digital and structural transformation approach” of such theoreticians as Schwab. The findings discussed in the paper indicate that, firstly, the mechanisms of the welfare government and the communitarian government are regarded as the main axes of policymaking of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Secondly, such signs of communitarian, balancing and equilibrium acts leave their impact on effective and constructive governance.

Keywords


  1. Agnew, J. and Corbridge, S., (2002), Mastering Space: Hegemony, Territory and International Political Economy, London: Routledge.
  2. Amani, M.R. (2021), Strategic Key Concepts, Tehran, National Defense University and Research Institute [in Persian].
  3. Ashworth, W.J., (2017), The Industrial Revolution: The State, Knowledge and Global Trade, London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
  4. Babones, S., (2018), ‘How Netware Apps Are Reshaping the Personal Transportation Techno system’, The Zhongguo Institute, 18
  5. Baru, S., (2012), ‘Geo-economics and Strategy’, Survival, vol.54, no.3, pp.47-58.
  6. Bradshaw, T., (2019), ‘The Start-ups Building “Dark Kitchens”, Financial Times, 21
  7. Carbone, C., (2018), ‘Leaked Google Employee’s Email Reveals Effort to Boost Latino Vote, Surprise That Some Voted for Trump’, Fox News, 12
  8. Chui, M., Manyika, J. and Miremadi, M., (2016), ‘Where Machines could Replace Humans – and Where they can’t (yet)’, McKinsey Quarterly, vol.30, no.2, pp.1-12.
  9. Dahl, R.A., (1957), ‘The Concept of Power’, Behavioral science, vol.2, no.3, pp.201-15.
  10. Diao, X., McMillan, M. and Rodrik, D., (2019), ‘The Recent Growth Boom in Developing Economies: A Structural Change Perspective’, in M. Nissanke and J.A. Ocampo (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Development Economics, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 281-334.
  11. Horowitz, M.C., (2018), ‘Artificial Intelligence, International Competition, and the Balance of Power’, Texas National Security Review, vol.1, no.3, May.
  12. Ivanov, I., (2018), ‘Russia, China and the New World Order’, Russian International Affairs Council, 19
  13. Jervis, R., (1989), The Meaning of the Nuclear Revolution: Statecraft and the Prospect of Armageddon, London: Cornell University Press.
  14. Lukin, A., (2018), China and Russia: The New Rapprochement, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  15. Luttwak, E.N., (2010), Endangered American Dream, New York: Simon and Schuster,
  16. MacCarthy, M., (2019), ‘Would Breaking Up Digital Platforms Enhance Free Speech?’ Forbes, 19
  17. Mazzucato, M., (2018), The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths, London: Penguin.
  18. McBride, S. and Vance, A., (2019), ‘Apple, Google, and Facebook Are Raiding Animal Research Labs’, Bloomberg, 18
  19. McCarthy, D.R., (2017), Technology and World Politics: An introduction, London: Routledge.
  20. Mearsheimer, J, (2014), ‘Why the Ukraine Crisis Is the West’s Fault: The Liberal Delusions That Provoked Putin’, Foreign Affairs, vol.93, pp.1-12.
  21. Mearsheimer, J, (2019), ‘Bound to Fail: The Rise and fall of the Liberal International Order’, International Security, vol.43, no.4, pp.7-50.
  22. Mearsheimer, J.J. and Walt, S.M., (2016), ‘The Case for Offshore Balancing’, Foreign Affairs, vol.95, no.4, pp.70-83.
  23. Mosalanejad, A. (2021), Strategic Policy Making in Theory and Practice, 5th Edition, Tehran: Tehran University Pres [in Persian].
  24. Mosalanejad, A. (2022), Political Economy; Principles, Function and Process, 7th Edition, Tehran: Tehran University Press [in Persian].
  25. Mosalanejad, A. (2023), Strategic Policy Making of Great Powers and Regional Actors, 3rd Edition, Tehran: Tehran University Press [in Persian].
  26. Schwab, K., (2016), ‘The Fourth Industrial Revolution: What It Means and How to Respond’, in G. Rose (ed.), The Fourth Industrial Revolution: A Davos Reade. Foreign Affairs, 12 December, pp.3–11.
  27. Schwab, K., (2018), Shaping the Fourth Industrial Revolution, World Economic Forum, Geneva.
  28. Sil, R. and Katzenstein, P.J., (2010), ‘Analytic Eclecticism in the Study of World Politics: Reconfiguring Problems and Mechanisms Across Research Traditions’, Perspectives on Politics, vol.8, no.2, pp.411-31.
  29. Smith, N.R., (2018), ‘Can Neoclassical Realism Become a Genuine Theory of International Relations?’ The Journal of Politics, vol.80, no.2, pp.742–9.
  30. Spolaore, E., (2013), ‘What Is European Integration Really About? A Political Guide for Economists’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol.27, no.3: 125–44.
  31. Stiglitz, J., (2019), People, Power, and Profits: Progressive Capitalism for an Age of Discontent, London: Penguin.
  32. Taylor, M.Z., (2016), The Politics of Innovation: Why Some Countries Are Better than Others at Science and Technology, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  33. Walt, S. M., (1998), ‘International Relations: One World, Many Theories’, Foreign Policy, no.110, pp.29–46.
  34. Waltz, K.N., (2000), ‘Structural Realism after the Cold War’, International Security, vol.25, no.1, pp.5–41.
  35. Ward, S., (2012), Neoliberalism and the Global Restructuring of Knowledge and Education, London: Routledge Press.
  36. Zuboff, S., (2019), The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for the Future at the New Frontier of Power, New York: Profile Books.
  37. Zuckerberg, M., (2018), ‘Protecting Democracy Is an Arms Race. Here’s How Facebook Can Help’, The Washington Times, 4