یادگیری خط‌مشی و خط‌مشی‌گذاری عمومی: واکاوی دامنه و گستره پژوهش‌ها,

نوع مقاله : مقاله مروری

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه تهران، قم، ایران

2 استاد مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران

3 دانشجوی مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه تهران، قم، ایران

10.22059/jppolicy.2025.102512

چکیده

مفهوم یادگیری خط‌مشی در طی دو دهه اخیر موردتوجه اغلب پژوهشگران و دانش‌پژوهان حوزه خط‌مشی‌گذاری قرار گرفته است. یادگیری خط‌مشی در عمومی‌ترین سطح عبارت است از به‌روزرسانی باورها، افزایش اطلاعات و دانش خط‌مشی‌گذاران. علی‌رغم پژوهش‌های متعدد انجام شده، و نیز به دلیل پراکندگی موضوعی در این حوزه، هنوز درک جامعی از این مفهوم ایجاد نشده است. هدف پژوهش حاضر، ایجاد تصویر کلان از یادگیری خط‌مشی در فضای حکمرانی است. براین‌اساس، در این پژوهش از یکی از محبوب‌ترین روش‌های مروری، یعنی مرور دامنه‌ای که آرکی و اومالی (۲۰۰۵) آن را ارائه نموده اند، استفاده شده است. برای شناسایی مطالعات، جستجوها در پایگاه‌داده‌های اسکوپوس، وب او ساینس و ابسکوهاست انجام شده است. برای غربالگری از چک‌لیست استانداردی استفاده کردیم، و در نهایت ۴۸ مطالعه وارد مرور نهایی شده‌اند. همچنین برای افزایش کیفیت مرور از دستورالعمل Prisma-ScR استفاده شده است. نتایج نشان می‌دهند که تمرکز اصلی پژوهش‌ها بر روی بررسی یادگیری خط‌مشی در ارتباط با سایر مفاهیم حوزه خط‌مشی‌گذاری (یادگیری خط‌مشی و انواع آن، ارزشیابی خط‌مشی، چارچوب ائتلاف مدافع، تغییر خط‌مشی، حکمرانی، ذی‌نفعان و بازیگران خط‌مشی، انتقال خط‌مشی، شکست خط‌مشی، انتشار خط‌مشی، همگرایی خط‌مشی) بوده است. در نهایت توصیه‌هایی جهت پژوهش‌های آتی ارائه شده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

مراجع

  1. Alcantara, C. (2009). Old wine in new bottles? Instrumental policy learning and the evolution of the certainty provision in comprehensive land claims agreements. Canadian Public Policy, 35(3), 325-341.
  2. An, B. Y., Porcher, S., & Tang, S. Y. (2024). Global diffusion of COVID-19 policies: The role of geographic, institutional, and cultural cues. Policy Studies Journal, 52(1), 169–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/PSJ.12514
  3. Babarczy, B., & Imre, L. (2017). Learning Processes in Hungarian Health Policy 1990–2004: A Case Study of Health Resource Allocation. European Policy Analysis, 3(1), 168–184. https://doi.org/10.1002/EPA2.1004
  4. Baekkeskov, E. (2016). Explaining science-led policy-making: pandemic deaths, epistemic deliberation and ideational trajectories. Policy Sciences, 49(4), 395–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11077-016-9264-Y/TABLES/5
  5. Bandelow, N. C., Vogeler, C. S., Hornung, J., Kuhlmann, J., & Heidrich, S. (2019). Learning as a Necessary but Not Sufficient Condition for Major Health Policy Change: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis Combining ACF and MSF. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 21(2), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2017.1393920
  6. Blouin Genest, G., Burlone, N., Champagne, E., Eastin, C., & Ogaranko, C. (2021). Translating COVID-19 emergency plans into policy: A comparative analysis of three Canadian provinces. Policy Design and Practice, 4(1), 115–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2020.1868123
  7. Boehmke, F. J., & Witmer, R. (2004). Disentangling diffusion: The effects of social learning and economic competition on state policy innovation and expansion. Political Research Quarterly, 57(1), 39-51.
  8. Borrás, S., & Højlund, S. (2015). Evaluation and policy learning: The learners’ perspective. European Journal of Political Research, 54(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12076
  9. Butz, A. M., Fix, M. P., & Mitchell, J. L. (2015). Policy learning and the diffusion of Stand‐Your‐Ground laws. Politics & Policy, 43(3), 347-377.
  10. Campbell, F., Sein, T. T., Htoo, T. S., Khine, W. Y. K., Howard, N., & Balabanova, D. (2023). Policy space and pro-health equity national policymaking: a case study of Myanmar during political transition (2006-16). Health Policy and Planning, 38(2), 170–180. https://doi.org/10.1093/HEAPOL/CZAC076
  11. Casula, M., & Pazos-Vidal, S. (2021). Assessing the Multi-level Government Response to the COVID-19 Crisis: Italy and Spain Compared. International Journal of Public Administration, 44(11–12), 994–1005. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2021.1915330
  12. Common, R., & Gheorghe, I. (2017). Assessing strategic policy transfer in Romanian Public Management. Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/0952076717730427, 34(3), 287–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076717730427
  13. Crescenzi, M. J. C. (2007). Reputation and Interstate Conflict. American Journal of Political Science, 51(2), 382–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00257.x
  14. Crow, D. A., DeLeo, R. A., Albright, E. A., Taylor, K., Birkland, T., Zhang, M., Koebele, E., Jeschke, N., Shanahan, E. A., & Cage, C. (2023). Policy learning and change during crisis: COVID-19 policy responses across six states. Review of Policy Research, 40(1), 10–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/ROPR.12511
  15. Di Mascio, F., Galli, D., Natalini, A., Ongaro, E., & Stolfi, F. (2017). Learning-Shaping Crises: A Longitudinal Comparison of Public Personnel Reforms in Italy, 1992‒2014. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 19(2), 119–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2016.1154279
  16. Dolowitz, D. P., & Marsh, D. (2000). Learning from abroad: The role of policy transfer in contemporary policy‐making. Governance, 13(1), 5-23.
  17. Dominique, K. C., Malik, A. A., & Remoquillo-Jenni, V. (2013). International benchmarking: Politics and policy. Science and Public Policy, 40(4), 504–513. https://doi.org/10.1093/SCIPOL/SCS128
  18. Donovan, C. (2007). Introduction: Future pathways for science policy and research assessment: metrics vs peer review, quality vs impact. Science and Public Policy, 34(8), 538–542. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234207X256529
  19. Dumet, L., & Nelson, H. (2024). Achieving paid family leave in Oregon, USA: analysis of the policy process using the advocacy coalition framework. Journal of Public Health Policy, 45(1), 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1057/S41271-023-00455-0/METRICS
  20. Dunlop, C. A., James, S., & Radaelli, C. M. (2020). Can’t get no learning: the Brexit fiasco through the lens of policy learning. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(5), 703–722. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1667415
  21. Dunlop, C.A., Radaelli, C.M., Trein, P. (2018). Introduction: The Family Tree of Policy Learning. In: Dunlop, C., Radaelli, C., Trein, P. (eds) Learning in Public Policy. International Series on Public Policy . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76210-4_1
  22. Ettelt, S., Mays, N., & Nolte, E. (2012). Policy learning from abroad: why it is more difficult than it seems. Policy & Politics, 40(4), 491–504. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557312X643786
  23. Feindt, P. H. (2010). POLICY-LEARNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY INTEGRATION IN THE COMMON AGRICULTURAL POLICY, 1973–2003. Public Administration, 88(2), 296–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-9299.2010.01833.X
  24. Frantz, J. E., & Sato, H. (2005). The fertile soil for policy learning. Policy Sciences, 38(2), 159-176.
  25. Gilardi, F. (2010). Who learns from what in policy diffusion processes?. American journal of political science, 54(3), 650-666.
  26. Goyal, N., & Howlett, M. (2019). Framework or metaphor? Analysing the status of policy learning in the policy sciences. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 12(3), 257-273.
  27. Green, S. O., & Turner, E. (2007). Understanding policy convergence in Britain and Germany: towards a framework for analysis. German Politics, 16(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644000601157285.
  28. Greve, C., & Hodge, G. A. (2020). Global Diffusion of P3 Policy: Learning Perspectives for Social Infrastructure. Public Works Management & Policy, 25(3), 312–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724X20927714
  29. Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative politics, 275-296.
  30. Hetling, A., McDermott, M. L., & Mapps, M. (2008). Symbolism versus policy learning: Public opinion of the 1996 U.S. welfare reforms. American Politics Research, 36(3), 335–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X07313736
  31. Hilary Arksey & Lisa O'Malley (2005) Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8:1, 19-32, DOI:10.1080/1364557032000119616
  32. Houlihan, B. (2012). Sport policy convergence: a framework for analysis. European Sport Management Quarterly, 12(2), 111–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2012.669390.
  33. Hudson, J., & Kim, B. Y. (2014). Policy transfer using the ‘gold standard’: exploring policy tourism in practice. Policy & Politics, 42(4), 495–511. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557312X655620
  34. Johnston, K., Danho, E. J., Yarrow, E., Cameron, R., Dann, Z., Ekinsmyth, C., Busoi, G., & Doyle, A. (2023). Governance and public policies: Support for women entrepreneurs in France and England? International Review of Administrative Sciences, 89(4), 1097–1115. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523221120142/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1177_00208523221120142-FIG2.JPEG
  35. Kaye-Essien, C. W. (2020). The Politics of Discontinuity and Its Medium Term Policy Outcomes: Evidence from Ghana. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(7), 599–610. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1644519
  36. Keefe, J. M., & Krawchenko, T. (2023). Policies that Support and Hinder Families as Partners in Care during COVID-19 Pandemic: Comparative Policy Learning from England, British Columbia, and the Netherlands. Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue Canadienne Du Vieillissement, 42(4), 754–760. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0714980823000296
  37. Kemmerling, A. (2010). Does Europeanization lead to policy convergence? The role of the Single Market in shaping national tax policies. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(7), 1058–1073. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2010.499250
  38. Kemp, R., & Weehuizen, R. (2005). Policy Learning: What does it mean and how can we study it?.
  39. Kingiri, A. N. (2014). Comparative Strategic Behavior of Advocacy Coalitions and Policy Brokers: The Case of Kenya’s Biosafety Regulatory Policy. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 16(4), 373–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2014.942569
  40. Knox, C. (2021). Development evaluation in authoritarian states: A case from Kazakhstan. Development Policy Review, 39(1), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12470
  41. Koebele, E. A. (2019). Policy learning in collaborative environmental governance processes. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 21(3), 242–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2019.1623661
  42. Lahat, L., Keynan, O., & Scala, F. (2024). Capitalising on Twitter for Policy Learning during Crises: The Case of the Covid-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Public Administration, 47Lahat, L(10), 680–689. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2023.2171432
  43. Lockwood, C., Dos Santos, K. B., & Pap, R. (2019). Practical guidance for knowledge synthesis: ping review methods. Asian nursing research, 13(5), 287-294.
  44. Marsh, D., & McConnell, A. (2010). Towards a framework for establishing policy success. Public administration, 88(2), 564-583.
  45. Matanhire-Zihanzu, C. N., Chambers, S., Bagg, J., & Chimimba, P. (2022). Assessing Malawi’s recent development of a National Oral Health Policy – learning for the future. Journal of Global Health Reports, 6, e2022062. https://doi.org/10.29392/001C.57368
  46. May, P. J. (1992). Policy learning and failure. Journal of public policy, 12(4), 331-354.
  47. Meredith Glaser, Luca Bertolini, Marco te Brömmelstroet, Oliver Blake & Casey Ellingson (2021): Learning through policy transfer? Reviewing a decade of scholarship for the field of transport, Transport Reviews, DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2021.2003472.
  48. Moyson, S. (2017). Cognition and policy change: the consistency of policy learning in the advocacy coalition framework. Policy and Society, 36(2), 320–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2017.1322259
  49. Moyson, S., & Scholten, P. (2018). Theories on policy learning: Existing approaches and future challenges. In Knowledge, policymaking and learning for European cities and regions. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  50. Moyson, S., Scholten, P., & Weible, C. M. (2017). Policy learning and policy change: Theorizing their relations from different perspectives. Policy and society, 36(2), 161-177.
  51. Munn, Z., Peters, M. D., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC medical research methodology, 18, 1-7.
  52. Munn, Z., Pollock, D., Khalil, H., Alexander, L., Mclnerney, P., Godfrey, C. M.,... & Tricco, A. C. (2022). What are scoping reviews? Providing a formal definition of scoping reviews as a type of evidence synthesis. JBI evidence synthesis, 20(4), 950-952.
  53. Nyanchoka, L., Tudur-Smith, C., Iversen, V., Tricco, A. C., & Porcher, R. (2019). A scoping review describes methods used to identify, prioritize and display gaps in health research. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 109, 99-110.
  54. Ojanen, M., Brockhaus, M., Korhonen-Kurki, K., & Petrokofsky, G. (2021). Navigating the science-policy interface: Forest researcher perspectives. Environmental Science & Policy, 118, 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVSCI.2021.01.002
  55. Pattison, A. (2018), Factors Shaping Policy Learning: A Study of Policy Actors in Subnational Climate and Energy Issues. Review of Policy Research, 35: 535-563. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12303
  56. Peters, M. D., Godfrey, C. M., Khalil, H., McInerney, P., Parker, D., & Soares, C. B. (2015). Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Implementation, 13(3), 141-146.
  57. Pierre, J., & Peters, B.G. (2000). Governance, Politics and the State.
  58. Quaglia, L., & Verdun, A. (2023). Explaining the response of the ECB to the COVID-19 related economic crisis: inter-crisis and intra-crisis learning. Journal of European Public Policy, 30(4), 635–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2022.2141300
  59. Radaelli, C. M. (2009). Measuring policy learning: regulatory impact assessment in Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(8), 1145–1164. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760903332647
  60. Reeleder, D., Goel, V., Singer, P. A., & Martin, D. K. (2006). Accountability Agreements in Ontario Hospitals: Are They Fair? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(1), 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mul024
  61. Rouillard, J. J., Heal, K. V., Reeves, A. D., & Ball, T. (2012). Impact of institutions on flood policy learning. Water Policy, 14(2), 232–249. https://doi.org/10.2166/WP.2011.249
  62. Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (1993). Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press.
  63. Schoeller, M. G., & Heidebrecht, S. (2023). Continuity despite crises: Germany’s euro policy in the light of the pandemic, war and inflation. Journal of European Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2218883
  64. Scholten, P. (2017). The limitations of policy learning: a constructivist perspective on expertise and policy dynamics in Dutch migrant integration policies. Policy and Society, 36(2), 345–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2017.1322263
  65. Serban, I. D. (2023). Exploring the European Union external actorness moving from norms to policy practices. European Political Science, 22(4), 459–475. https://doi.org/10.1057/S41304-023-00421-0/METRICS
  66. Squevin, P., Aubin, D., Montpetit, É., & Moyson, S. (2021). Closer than they look at first glance: A systematic review and a research agenda regarding measurement practices for policy learning. International Review of Public Policy, 3(3: 2), 146-171.
  67. Ssengooba, F., McPake, B., & Palmer, N. (2012). Why performance-based contracting failed in Uganda--an “open-box” evaluation of a complex health system intervention. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 75(2), 377–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOCSCIMED.2012.02.050
  68. Stark, A., & van der Arend, J. (2024). The traveller’s guide to policy learning. Journal of European Public Policy, 31(7), 2076–2097. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2243997
  69. Suh, J., Kim, H. A., & Han, A. (2023). Policy confidence in crises: an examination across waves of the COVID-19 pandemic. International Review of Public Administration, 28(2), 221–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2023.2225911
  70. Trein, Philipp, Literature Report: A Review of Policy Learning in Five Strands of Political Science Research (March 31, 2015). INSPIRES Working Paper, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2707344
  71. van Voorst, S., & Mastenbroek, E. (2019). Evaluations as a decent knowledge base? Describing and explaining the quality of the European Commission’s ex-post legislative evaluations. Policy Sciences, 52(4), 625–644. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11077-019-09358-Y/TABLES/4
  72. Varjú, V. (2022). The policy transfer of environmental policy integration: path dependency, route flexibility, or the Hungarian way? Policy Studies, 43(5), 943–961. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2021.1882670
  73. Verge, T., & Lombardo, E. (2019). The contentious politics of policy failure: The case of corporate board gender quotas in Spain. Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/0952076719852407, 36(2), 232–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076719852407
  74. Walsh, J. I. (2006). Policy failure and policy change: British security policy after the cold war. Comparative Political Studies, 39(4), 490-518.
  75. Wang, H., Chen, B., & Koppenjan, J. (2022). A refined experimentalist governance approach to incremental policy change: the case of process-tracing China’s central government infrastructure PPP policies between 1988 and 2017. Journal of Chinese Governance, 7(1), 27–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/23812346.2021.1898151
  76. Williams, R. A. (2012). The limits of policy analytical capacity: Canadian financial regulatory reform. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 25(6), 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513551211260630/FULL/XML
  77. Zaki, B. L., & Wayenberg, E. (2023). How does policy learning take place across a multilevel governance architecture during crises? Policy & Politics, 51(1), 131–155. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557321X16680922931773
  78. Zaki, B., Wayenberg, E., & George, B. (2022). A systematic review of policy learning: tiptoeing through a conceptual minefield. POLICY STUDIES ORGANIZATION YEARBOOK, 12(1), 1–52.
سیاستگذاری عمومی
دوره 11، شماره 2
تیر 1404
صفحه 157-181

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار