طراحی چارچوب سیاستگذاری برای تحول‌دیجیتال در آموزش‌عالی: ترکیبی فراقوم نگارانه از مدل‌های سیاستگذاری عمومی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت آموزش‌عالی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران

2 دانشیار برنامه ریزی و توسعه آموز ش عالی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران

3 دانشیار مدیریت منابع انسانی، دانشکده مدیریت دولتی و علوم سازمانی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

4 دانشیار مدیریت آموزشی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران

10.22059/jppolicy.2026.106380

چکیده

تحول ‌دیجیتال در آموزش‌عالی به عنوان ضرورتی اجتناب‌ناپذیر تلقی شده و نقش دولت‌ها و سیاستهای ‌عمومی در این ‌حوزه کمتر مورد توجه ‌بوده است. به کارگیری هریک از مدل‌های موجود سیاستگذاری‌عمومی به‌تنهایی در این حوزه منجر به ناکارآمدی وعدم پاسخگوئی به مسائل خاص و الزامات فضای تحول‌دیجیتال می‌شود. هدف این مطالعه، ترکیب تحقیقات و مدلهای موجود سیاستگذاری عمومی و مناسب‌سازی آنها با فضای تحول دیجیتال آموزش عالی است. روش‌پژوهش، فراترکیب و فراقوم‌نگاری است که با استفاده از رویکرد هفت‌مرحله‌ای نوبلیت و هار و ترکیب فراقوم‌نگارانه ۲۰ مدل و ترکیب تحقیقات درسه گام تجربه متقابل، تجربه تضادها و ردیات و ترجمه خط استدلالی انجام‌شد. نتایج شامل شناسایی فرایند شش‌مرحله‌ای فرامدل شامل تبیین وضعیت و شناسایی بازیگران، تدقیق مسئله و تعیین اهداف، تحلیل شواهد و چارچوب جمع‌آوری اطلاعات، تدوین گزینه‌ها، سناریوها و انتخاب گزینه‌ها با مشارکت بازیگران و اجرا همراه با پایش است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

مراجع

  1. Abbasi, T. (2023). The public policy cycle: Some implicit implications of policy studies in higher education. Tehran University Press. (in Persian).
  2. Adam, L. (2003). "Information and Communication Technologies in Higher Education in Africa: Initiatives and Challenges." Journal of Higher Education in Africa/Revue de l’enseignement supérieur en Afrique, 1(1), 195–221
  3. Al-Saqqa, S., Sawalha, S., & Abdelnabi, H. (2020). Agile software development: Methodologies and trends. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 14(11), 246–270. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i11.13269
  4. Alvani, M., & Sharifzadeh, F. (2015). The public policy-making process. Tehran: Allameh Tabatabai University Press. (in Persian).
  5. Barnett-Page, E., & Thomas, J. (2009). Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: A critical review. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 9, 59. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-59.
  6. Asgari, Nasser.(1397).Theories and Fundamentals of Public Policy Making,Tehran:farhang. (in Persian).
  7. Bauer, A., Capari, L., Fuchs, D., & Udrea, T. (2023). Diversification, integration, and opening: Developments in modelling for policy. Science and Public Policy, 50(6). (in Persian). https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scad038
  8. Carey, M. C., Kent, B., & Latour, J. M. (2019). Using meta-ethnography to develop a conceptual model of peer-assisted learning of nursing students in clinical practice. Nursing Open, 6(2), 473–481. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.229
  9. Casillas, M., Ramirez Martinell, A., & López Olivera, R. (2024). Periods of technological change in higher education. Journal of Comparative & International Higher Education, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.32674/jcihe.v16i2.5920
  10. Caldera, H. (2015). The landscape of transnational higher education. Higher Education Policy, 28(3), 327-348. https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2015.6
  11. Cairney, p. (2013). Standing on the shoulders of giants: How do we combinethe insights of multiple theories in public policy Studies?. Policy StudiesJournal, 41(1), 1–21.
  12. Christensen, C. M., & Eyring, H. J. (2011). The innovative university: Changing the DNA of higher education from the inside out. Jossey-Bass
  13. Chen, Y., & Reyes, R. (2024). Review of completed studies on online learning platforms in higher education institutions. International Journal of Advanced Research, 12(7), 965–977. https://doi.org/10.21474/ijar01/1913
  14. Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 39(7), 3-7.
  15. Danayifard, H., & Abbasi, T. (2007). Theories of public policy change: Their applications in Iran. Mehraban Publishing Institute. (in Persian).
  16. Danayifard, H. (2016). New discourses in public policymaking. Tehran: Imam Sadiq University Press. (in Persian).
  17. Díez-Garrido, M. (2023). Digital transparency and political communication. Profesional de la información, 32(1). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.ene.04
  18. Dye, T. H. R. (2013). Understanding public policy. Available online at:https://repository.vnu.edu.vn/handle/vnu_123/89996.
  19. Eskandari, A., Manian, A., Soltani, M., & Yazdani, H. R. (2024). A meta-model for policy-making in artificial intelligence development in the fintech industry. Iranian Journal of Public Administration Studies, 7(3), 1–49. https://doi.org/10.22034/jipas.2024.440482.1691. (in Persian).
  20. European Commission. (2021). Digital Education Action Plan (2021-2027): Accessible, innovative and high-quality infrastructure for digital education. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/5c34c2fb-en.
  21. Fowler, M. (2001). The new methodology. Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences, 6(1), 12–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03160222.
  22. France, E. F., Uny, I., Ring, N., Turley, R. L., Maxwell, M., Duncan, E. A. S., Jepson, R. G., Roberts, R. J., & Noyes, J. (2019). A methodological systematic review of meta-ethnography conduct to articulate the complex analytical phases. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19(1), Article 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0670-7
  23. Gabriel, F., Marrone, R., Van Sebille, Y., Kovanovic, V., & de Laat, M. (2022). Digital education strategies around the world: Practices and policies. Studies in Higher Education, 47(1), 85-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2021.2022513.
  24. Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Innovation in innovation: The Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Social Science Information, 42(3), 293–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/05390184030423002
  25. Gutiérrez.Rivera, Higuera-Zimbron.Erika, Argüello. Alejandro. (2024). Georgina Strategic approach to digital transformation in higher education institutions.ECORFAN Journal Spain.DOI:10.35429/EJS.2024.20.11.1.14.
  26. Haase, S., & Buus, L. (2020). Translating government digitalisation policy in higher education institutions: The Danish case. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 15(4), 246–258. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1891-943x-2020-04-03
  27. Iosad, A. (2020). Digital at the core: A 2030 strategy framework for university leaders. https://www.uis.unesco.org/en/digital-transformation-higher-education-beyond-crisis
  28. Jones, M. (2023). Policy analysis and higher education policy. Higher Education Quarterly, 77(3), 345-358.
  29. Komljenovic, J., Birch, K., Sellar, S., Bergviken Rensfeldt, A., Deville, J., Eaton, C., ... & Williamson, B. (2024). Digitalised higher education: Key developments, questions, and concerns. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 1-17.
  30. Krishnasamy, Ong, Loo, and Thistlethwaite (2019) investigated how medical education affects empathy and compassion in medical students through a meta-ethnography.
  31. Li, C., & Brown, T. (2023). Policy-making models for digital education in China: A systematic review. Policy Studies, 44(5), 801–818.
  32. Liu, S., & He, Y. (2024). Revising higher education digitalization policy: A Chinese case study. Asia Pacific Education Review, 25(4), 541–560.
  33. Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2009). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. U.S. Department of Education.
  34. Merchan-Narváez, A., et al. (2024). Comparación de metodologías ágiles para el desarrollo de software. MQRinvestigar.
  35. Nieto-Taborda, M. L., & Luppicini, R. (2024). Accelerated digital transformation of higher education in the wake of COVID-19: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Changes in Education. https://doi.org/10.54480/jste.v2i2.37
  36. Nguyen, H. L., Dang, B., Hong, Y., & Nguyen, A. (2024). Digital transformation in Vietnamese higher education: an epistemic network analysis of policy documents. Journal of International Cooperation in Education. https://doi.org/10.1108/jice-03-2024-0010
  37. Pilkington, H. (2017). Employing meta-ethnography in the analysis of qualitative data sets on youth activism: A new tool for transnational research projects? Qualitative Research, 18(1), 108–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794117707805
  38. Pereira, M., & Prado, S. (2020). A new agile process for web development. International Conference on Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10779-020-0
  39. Popova, T. N., Mitrofanova, Y. S., Ivanova, O. A., & Vereshchak, S. B. (2020). Economic and Organizational Aspects of University Digital Transformation (pp. 371–381). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5584-8_32
  40. Pina, V., & Torres, L. (2019). Online transparency and corporate governance in Spanish governmental agencies. Online Information Review, 43(4), 653-675. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-03-2018-0102
  41. rajabibazl, S. , khorasani, A. , yazdani, H. and alami, F. (2025). The Necessity of Rethinking Policy Assumptions in Digital transformation of Higher Education. Journal of Economic & Developmental Sociology, 14(2), 84-104. doi: 10.22034/jeds.2025.68851.1896
  42. Romanovskyi, O& El Makhdi, M. (2021). Higher education innovatics: Management of innovation in the sphere of higher education and science. Journal of Social
  43. Shamim, M. (2024). Agile project management in software development industries: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Software Engineering and Applications, 13(2), 45-59. https://doi.org/10.1002/s00001-020-0096-4
  44. Soni, S., & Kaur, P. (2011). Agile methodology - A new framework for software development.
  45. Stolze, A. (2020). A meta-ethnography on HEIs’ transformation into more entrepreneurial institutions: Towards an action-framework proposition. Industry and Higher Education, 35(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950422220922677
  46. Taleb, M., & Azizi, H. (2022). Digitalization of public policies for higher education in the 21st century. Journal of Public Administration Studies, 27(2), 106-119.
  47. Williamson, B., & Hogan, A. (2020). Commercialization and governance in digital higher education: Mapping the new policymaking terrain. Journal of Education Policy, 35(1), 91–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2019.1664767.
  48. Yazdani, H. R. (2024). Doctoral research methods course notes, Department of Management, University of Tehran. (in Persian).
سیاستگذاری عمومی
دوره 12، شماره 1
فروردین 1405
صفحه 209-224

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار