طراحی مدل مفهومی برای پیشگیری از خط‌مشی‌گذاری مبتنی بر لجاجت در نظام حکمرانی ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

استاد خط‌مشی و اداره امور عمومی، دانشکده مدیریت دولتی و علوم سازمانی، دانشکدگان مدیریت دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

10.22059/jppolicy.2026.106372

چکیده

هدف این پژوهش، طراحی یک مدل مفهومی برای پیشگیری از خط‌مشی‌گذاری لجوجانه در نظام حکمرانی ایران است. لجاجت در خط‌مشی‌گذاری به معنای اصرار خط‌مشی‌گذاران بر ادامه تصمیماتی است که ناکارآمدی آن‌ها با وجود شواهد متعارض و بازخوردهای منفی آشکار شده است. چنین رویکردی پیامدهایی چون اتلاف منابع، کاهش اعتماد عمومی و تضعیف کارآمدی نظام حکمرانی را در پی دارد. این پژوهش با رویکردی توسعه‌ای–کاربردی و به‌صورت آمیخته انجام شد. در بخش کیفی، با بهره‌گیری از روش تحلیل تم و مصاحبه با ۲۰ نفر از خبرگان دانشگاهی و اجرایی، ابعاد و شاخص‌های اولیه مدل استخراج گردید. سپس در بخش کمّی، از روش دلفی سه‌مرحله‌ای برای دستیابی به اجماع خبرگان در خصوص ابعاد و شاخص‌ها استفاده شد. یافته‌ها نشان داد پنج بعد اصلی شامل شناسایی تعصبات و لجاجت خط‌مشی‌گذاران، ارزیابی و تحلیل داده‌ها و شواهد، انعطاف‌پذیری و بازنگری خط‌مشی، مشورت و تبادل نظر و شفافیت و پاسخگویی به عنوان مؤلفه‌های کلیدی اجتناب از خط‌مشی‌گذاری لجوجانه (مقوله محوری) تثبیت شدند. نتایج تحقیق نشان می‌دهد پیشگیری از لجاجت در خط‌مشی‌گذاری تنها به اصلاح رفتار فردی خط‌مشی‌گذاران محدود نمی‌شود، بلکه نیازمند ایجاد سازوکارهای نهادی، شواهدمحور و مشارکتی است. مدل ارائه‌شده می‌تواند به عنوان چارچوبی عملیاتی برای ارتقای کارآمدی، مشروعیت و پایداری خط‌مشی‌ها در نظام حکمرانی ایران مورد استفاده قرار گیرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


  1. Abdi, A. (2021). Analysis of population policies in Iran and their consequences. Public Policy Quarterly, 7(2), 45–67. (in Persian)
  2. ahanbini, M., & Tavakoli, S. (2020). Analysis of continuing investments in fossil fuel power plants and its consequences in Iran. Energy and Environment Research, 15(2), 51-70. (in Persian).
  3. Akbari, A., & Gholizadeh, I. (2023). Social and situational prevention mechanisms in the Users' Rights Protection and Regulation of Social Messenger Platforms plan. The 4th National Cyber Defense Conference. Retrieved from https://civilica.com/doc/1917497
  4. Allison, G. T., & Zelikow, P. (1999). Essence of decision: Explaining the Cuban missile crisis. New York: Longman.
  5. Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
  6. Argyris, C. (1991). Teaching smart people how to learn. Harvard Business Review, 69(3), 99–109.
  7. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1996). Organizational learning II: Theory, method and practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  8. Azizi, M. (2022). Challenges of cyberspace governance in Iran. Tehran: Research Institute for Culture, Art and Communication. (in Persian)
  9. Berman, E. M. (2022). Public administration in theory and practice (3rd ed.). Routledge.
  10. Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x
  11. Bovens, M., ‘t Hart, P., & Kuipers, S. (2014). The politics of policy evaluation. Oxford University Press.
  12. Dunn, W. N. (2018). Public Policy Analysis (6th ed.). New York: Routledge.
  13. Dynamics of policy change in authoritarian countries: A multiple-case study on China. Journal of Public Policy, 40(2), 236–258. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X18000351.
  14. Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011.
  15. Peters (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public policy (pp. 319–335). Oxford University Press.
  16. Ghorbani, M., Ahmadi, M., & Rezaei, S. (2020). Evaluation system of faculty members in Iranian universities and its challenges. Higher Education Studies, 25(3), 54–73. (in Persian)
  17. Heald, D. (2006). Transparency as an instrumental value. In C. Hood & D. Heald (Eds.), Transparency: The Key to Better Governance? (pp. 59–73). Oxford University Press.
  18. Hill, M., & Hupe, P. (2014). Implementing public policy: An introduction to the study of operational governance. London: Sage.
  19. Hosseini, F. (2021). Implementation of ethical policies in Iran: social consequences. Iranian Cultural Studies Journal, 9(3), 33-50. (in Persian)
  20. Hosseini, F., & Karimi, A. (2019). Continuation of population policies and social consequences. Social Policy Journal, 15(1), 22-40. (in Persian)
  21. Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2003). Studying public policy: Policy cycles and policy subsystems. Oxford University Press.
  22. Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2003). Studying public policy: Policy cycles and policy subsystems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  23. Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2023). Policy-making in complex environments: Institutional pressures and policy rigidity. Policy Sciences, 56(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-023-09456-7.
  24. Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2023). Policy-making in the modern state: Challenges and innovations. Oxford University Press.
  25. Imani Jajermi, H. (2016). Cultural sociology and policymaking in Iran. Tehran: Sociologists Publishing. (in Persian)
  26. Islamic Parliament Research Center of Iran. (2019). Analysis of population policies in Iran: Challenges and solutions. Social Studies Office. (in Persian)
  27. Islamic Parliament Research Center of Iran. (2019). Analysis of the consequences of subsidy and currency policies in Iran. Economic Studies Office. (in Persian)
  28. Islamic Parliament Research Center of Iran. (2021). Protection Plan for users’ rights in cyberspace: Impact analysis and challenges. Office of Communications and IT. (in Persian)
  29. Jahanbini, A., & Tavakoli, H. R. (2020). Challenges of energy subsidies and the necessity to reform energy sector policies in Iran. Iranian Economic Research Quarterly, 24(4), 75-102. (in Persian)
  30. Kalantari, E. (2017). Challenges of water policies in Iran: From dam construction to land subsidence crisis. Iranian Journal of Natural Resources Management, 9(2), 120–144. (in Persian)
  31. Kamrani, M. (2019). Challenges of the student admission system in Iran and proposed solutions. Social Sciences Journal, 23(4), 1-15. (in Persian)
  32. Keshavarz, Z. (2015). Population policies and their consequences in Iran. Social Welfare Journal, 15(2), 89–110. (in Persian)
  33. Kingdon, J. W. (1995). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. HarperCollins College Publishers.
  34. Maleki Rouhanavaz, S., & Javadnia Riek, M. (2024). Reviewing the Protection Plan for Users’ Rights in Cyberspace in Iran. 13th National Conference on New Research in Education, Psychology, Jurisprudence, Law, and Social Sciences. Retrieved from https://civilica.com/doc/1992346
  35. mani, S. (2022). Examining the dimensions of the Protection Plan and its consequences on cyberspace governance in Iran. Public Policy Quarterly, 8(2), 45-68. (in Persian)
  36. March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. New York, NY: Free Press.
  37. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1991). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 41–62). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Berman, E. (2022). Public administration and organizational behavior: Culture, values, and policy implementation. New York, NY: Routledge.
  38. Moieni, A., & Kazemi, R. (2020). Identifying policy dualities in Iran’s environmental sector. Public Policy Quarterly, 6(3), 75–102. (in Persian)
  39. Munck af Rosenschöld, J., Rozema, J. G., & Frye-Levine, L. A. (2014). Institutional inertia and climate change: A review of the new institutionalist literature. WIREs Climate Change, 5(5), 639–648. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.292.
  40. (2017). Policy experimentation and pilot projects in public governance. OECD Publishing.
  41. ostami, A. (2020). Economic policies in Iran: Review of structural adjustment effects and social consequences. Iranian Economic Policy Studies, 12(3), 45-68. (in Persian)
  42. Peters, B. G. (2019). Institutional Theory in Political Science: The New Institutionalism (5th ed.). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  43. Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94(2), 251–
  44. Population Policy in Iran (Findings from a scoping review). (2023). Iranian Social Issues Review, 14(1), 89-111. (in Persian)
  45. Rabiei, A. (2018). Welfare and subsidy policies in Iran. Tehran: Nashr Ney. (in Persian)
  46. Rafiipour, F. (2003). Development and conflict: Analyzing the impact of population policies on Iranian society. Tehran: Entesharat Sherkat Sahami. (in Persian)
  47. Raghfar, H. (2001). Investigating the consequences of structural adjustment policies on social justice in Iran. Tehran: Institute for Social Security Research. (in Persian)
  48. Raghfar, H. (2001). Structural adjustment policies and their consequences in Iran. Iranian Economic Research Journal, 3(2), 51-74. (in Persian)
  49. Raghfar, H. (2018). Economic policies and their social consequences in Iran. Iranian Economic Research Quarterly, 22(3), 55-84. (in Persian)
  50. Rahmani, F., & Mohammadi, H. (2021). A meta-synthesis of studies on public policy implementation in Iran. Public Policy Quarterly, 7(1), 99–122. (in Persian)
  51. (2025, August 14). Diplomacy or defiance: Iran's rulers face existential choice after US-Israeli strikes. Reuters.https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/diplomacy-or-defiance-irans-rulers-face-existential-choice-after-us-israeli-2025-08-14/.
  52. Rezaei, M., & Karimi, N. (2021). Institutional and cultural resistance in the development of renewable energy in Iran. Energy Policy Quarterly, 12(3), 25-45. (in Persian).
  53. Rezaei, M., & Karimi, S. (2021). Energy transition and obstacles to the development of renewable energies in Iran. Energy Policy Quarterly, 12(1), 31–54. (in Persian)
  54. Rezaei, P., & Karimi, A. (2021). Delay in the utilization of renewable energies and policy challenges in Iran. Renewable Energy Studies, 6(2), 44–63. (in Persian)
  55. (2022). Iran pays twice its oil revenues as energy subsidies. Islamic Republic News Agency. Retrieved from https://www.irna.ir/news/85156250
  56. Sabatier, P. A. (2007). Theories of the policy process. Westview Press.
  57. Sabatier, P. A., & Weible, C. (2014). Theories of the policy process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  58. Sadraei, M. (2021). Resistance to e-learning in Iranian universities: Causes and consequences. Education and Technology Quarterly, 12(2), 23–35. (in Persian)
  59. Samii-Nasab, M. (2023). Energy subsidies in Iran and their consequences. Iranian Economic Research Quarterly, 20(2), 51–73. (in Persian)
  60. Staw, B. M. (1981). The escalation of commitment to a course of action. Academy of Management Review, 6(4), 577–587.
  61. Sullivan, H. (2019). Evidence into policy: Storytelling as a mechanism for policy learning. Policy & Politics, 47(3), 441–459.
  62. Tabaar, M. A. (2024). Why Iran Is Entering a Dangerous Moment. Journal of Democracy. https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/online-exclusive/why-iran-is-entering-a-dangerous-moment/
  63. Tabar, M. (2024). Political culture and stubbornness in governance systems. Tehran: SAMT. Tasnim News Agency. (2025). Analysis of currency policies and proposed package for economic reforms. Retrieved from https://www.tasnimnews.com/fa/news/1404/06/14/3392379.
  64. Tabatabaei, Z. (2021). Analysis of hijab and chastity policies in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Cultural Studies Quarterly, 15(2), 89–115. (in Persian)
  65. Tayebi, S. K., & Zamani, Z. (2021). Currency policy and adjusting exchange rate distortions in Iran. Iranian Economic Research, 24(3), 121–145. (in Persian)
  66. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458.